Apparently, Cybercrime Isn't Actually A Trillion-Dollar Business
from the maybe-it-needs-a-bailout-too dept
While online scams and cybercrime are growing, the claim made recently that cybercrime is a trillion-dollar business simply isn't true, says The Register. As Gary Stiennon points out, if it were, it would be bigger than global IT business itself, as well as the GDP of several industrialized nations. AT&T's chief security officer threw out the figure in front of a Senate committee; he also said that cybercrime was a bigger business than the global drug trade, another claim Stiennon disputes. He dug into where the myth was started, and how it's evolved, and traced it back to a single comment made by a consultant to the US Treasury Department in 2005. It's then been so commonly cited -- often by security companies looking to advance their own agendas -- and repeated that it's become widely accepted. Certainly cybercrime is a problem, and a growing one, but overstating its true impact won't make fighting it any easier.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cybercrime, hype
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Of course the population could be smaller, but then amount each would earn would go way up. Where is this population of 100,000 people who made $10,000,000 each?!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
You mean like that NewYork Times writer that got an award for a completely made up story?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A trillion isn't that much money.
- Obama
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
- Obama"
Amateurs
- GWB
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ah yes, "The Big Lie".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fact checking?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Fact checking?
"That cheerful person answering the phone may identify himself as Sam, but his real name is more likely Satyajit -- and the overwhelming odds are that he lives somewhere like New Delhi," reveals an administration source.
"Many large companies have outsourced their customer service lines -- the White House is simply adopting a standard, modern- day business practice."
The Obama administration has tirelessly championed outsourcing, claiming that shipping jobs overseas strengthens the American economy.
"Outsourcing is just a new way of doing international trade," according to the President's annual report to Congress last year.
Now, as part of a commitment to trim government expenditures, the White House has begun to practice what it preaches.
"Look, when Joe Blow from Behind God's Back, Kan., calls to give President Obama his ideas on how to fix the economy or find Osama Bin Laden, it's not as if someone scrupulously jots down the message and passes it on," the administration insider explains.
"An operator basically blows the guy off in a polite way. Why should we pay an American Auto Worker top dollar to do that when we can hire some poor Indian in Calcutta who'll do it for pennies an hour?"
To avoid angering unemployed Americans who've lost their jobs to outsourcing, last month's switch from in-house operators went unannounced -- and administration officials refuse to confirm the story.
"The overseas phone workers have received special training to sound as American as possible -- their accents are almost undetectable," reveals the insider. "They've even been taught American slang phrases."
One way to tell that your call to the White House has been outsourced is to pay careful attention to that slang. "A lot of it is suspiciously outdated," reveals the insider. "For example, an operator may say, 'Oh, you're calling from Ohio -- that's peachy keen.'
"Most callers will simply assume the person they're talking to is some really unhip Young Republican type who's as American as apple pie -- but nothing could be further from the truth."
When Weekly World News called the White House and confronted an operator, he initially insisted he was in Washington. But after 20 minutes of grilling Haresh Ramanuja, 32, confessed that he was answering the call from a sweatshop-like phone bank in New Delhi.
That doesn't make him a total fraud, he insists.
"I really do love America," he said. "I love your Bruce Willis, baseball and rock 'n' roll music."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Fact checking?
if not, then I commend you for your good BS-storytelling skills...perhaps you should include this on your resume to The Onion on application?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Fact checking?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Human cognitive limitations at the bottom of the problem
[ link to this | view in chronology ]