Atari Apparently Learns Nothing From EA's Bad Experience With DRM
from the head-in-the-sand dept
Last September, (despite warnings to avoid overly cumbersome DRM), EA discovered just what sort of backlash annoying DRM could have when thousands of reviewers on Amazon slammed the game Spore for its overly limiting DRM from Securom. EA eventually backed down (somewhat), and on newer games seems a lot more sensitive to community concerns about DRM (though, many would argue not sensitive enough). Apparently, some of EA's competitors, however, haven't been paying much attention. Reader Tyler Hipwell sends in the news that Atari recently released the game Chronicles of Riddick with similarly awful DRM (requires online activation, limited to three total activations) and a ton of negative reviews are flowing to the Amazon listing. Either Atari didn't pay attention to EA's experience with Spore... or it somehow thought that the same thing wouldn't happen to its game as well. Neither one of those options says anything good about Atari.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: chronicles of riddick, drm, reviews, video games
Companies: atari, ea
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
http://thesims3.ea.com/view/pages/newsItem.jsp?item=-608201177
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
They've a good track-record on "The Sims" franchise thus far; I just hope the idiot executives did not decide to attempt to lock out modders...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I hold all games the exist in DRM hell to that standard.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
So if someone who's been raping you every weekend for 5 years says "I'll stop raping you tomorrow" will you buy them a valentines day present?
At least wait til its released...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Huh?
If you mean they claim to feel bad about treating thier customer as criminals, well yeah, they do "claim" that. Of course if you mean they on longer actually view thier customer as criminals, well we will see if they ever actually change anything.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DRM
And they full well deserve it too.
I am glad us anti-DRM peeps are nicely banded together now to retaliate (to an extent).
For those of you talking about The Sims, I would have to advise against a pre-order. Just because they say they will only use a CD-Key, doesn't mean they will follow through.
Wait til the game is being released before assuming they will follow through. They are EA after all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: DRM
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: DRM
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: DRM
seriously, Stardock reminds me of the gaming companies of old where making money was important, but first they they made fun games that they would like to play. Remember the old LucasArts or Sierra?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: DRM
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
a ton??
I don't think the 10 one star reviews on there now quite qualify as "a ton"...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: a ton??
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hmmm... I'm curious, though...
... Does this mean we have to keep the disc in the tray? That is still incredibly annoying.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hmmm... I'm curious, though...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hmmm... I'm curious, though...
I would be a bit more forgiving of this if they provided two discs in the box. I want a freakin' backup. Still, having the disc in the tray is so 1999.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hmmm... I'm curious, though...
I'm interested in Sims 3 but not at the cost of my privacy and security, I have enough games in my "to play" list that I can miss a few companies' line ups and not care.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hmmm... I'm curious, though...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Where in the World is Carmen Sandie... err, Will Wright going?
"No comment from EA."
Maybe he'll head over to Valve..?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Where in the World is Carmen Sandie... err, Will Wright going?
Looks like he's going back to his roots and starting a new business called "Stupid Fun Club".
Anyone with a business named that has to be somewhat deranged.
Hmm... I'm going to prep my resume.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Where in the World is Carmen Sandie... err, Will Wright going?
(honestly though I couldnt be happier - that pairing always conflicted me)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Where in the World is Carmen Sandie... err, Will Wright going?
The timing is interesting, though, coming on the heels of obnoxious DRM and players disappointed with the incompleteness of Spore. Perhaps he can exert more control over his creations this way?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Where in the World is Carmen Sandie... err, Will Wright going?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not quite a flash-mob yet.
First off, I think it should be required to get the publisher right if you want to Flamazon a product. Second, I stand by my choice of the word 'Onerous' to replace Draconian in the description of DRM, IP law, and a vast number of the popular topics here on techdirt.
Who's with me?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not quite a flash-mob yet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Not quite a flash-mob yet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Not quite a flash-mob yet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
1980s, meet 2009: DRM as it applied to Carmen Sandiego
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 1980s, meet 2009: DRM as it applied to Carmen Sandiego
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: 1980s, meet 2009: DRM as it applied to Carmen Sandiego
Well, that's not an issue really. Fodor's Travel Guides are often 500 to 1000-pages in length and Brøderbund also had a special version that corresponded directly to the gameplay. But yes, I suppose if you could get a hold of a Travel Guide, make a copy, you could probably copy it.
If I recall, gameplay was also time-based. Meaning, if you took too long to look up a fact, you'd loose a turn.
I think most people just bought a legit copy with the scarce resource-- the guide. I wonder what the piracy numbers (if available-- remember it was published in the 80s) for the Carmen Franchise were. If any numbers exist, I assume they were pretty low.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 1980s, meet 2009: DRM as it applied to Carmen Sandiego
A lot of games in the 80s and 90s came with manuals and other devices (such as the pirate wheel for Secret Of Monkey Island) with the intent that the game couldn't be played without the enclosed documents. The problems with this are many: it's very annoying to leaf through a book every time you want to play the game (and impossible to fire it up on the road unless you're prepared beforehand), lost or damaged manuals make the game unplayable, it's difficult to produce a budget-priced version of the game if you still have to print all the documentation.
Certainly, it's less intrusive than the DRM we're dealing with today, but it suffers from the same problems: it's annoying and only affects people who've actually bought the game while pirates find ways around it. To anyone who falls foul of this system, it makes the pirated version more attractive. Bad move.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Me thinks...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dunno.. I bought interplay's 20 year package a long time ago - all the games had a 'lookup' phrase to play them. It was a minor hassle - but now... heck, I got the CD and all, but not the book, so it's worthless to me, may as well toss it out. Was a bit pricey when I bought it too.
But yeah - it's at least a 'sensible' method - no garbage software that installs itself.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Remember Einstein's Definition of Insanity ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DRM = client (wake up people)
IF you can take a game purchased from Stardock, install it on a computer without their 'impulse' client and actually play it, THEN there is no DRM, if the client is required (and internet access is probably also required at least during install/verification)to play the game, then the game has DRM.
Lots of companies are trying the 'use our client and you can play our games', which is basically DRM that ties the games to that specific client. If you remove the client, then you can no longer play the games. And do you REALLY know everything their 'client' is doing? Do they have the right (via their click thru EULA) to change what their client does at any time, with their only 'notification' being that they update their EULA. Probably. Do the users have the right to play the games they have purchased without the client installed? Probably Not. Still think this isn't DRM?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: DRM = client (wake up people)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: DRM = client (wake up people)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: DRM = client (wake up people)
I ran Sins of a Solar empire for MONTHS without ever having Impulse installed on my system, in fact I was surprised when I finally got Impulse and found that since I registered my game (a month or two after I bought it and was the first and only time I've used the CD key), I already had an impulse account and could DL Sins whenever I want.
I also used a single CD (and later just downloaded it via Impulse) to set up multiple lan parties for Sins without any software or cracks or other such nonsense. They've publicly stated that Demigods will be the same way, they don't do anything at all to hamper LAN play, they have always held that you shouldn't have to start a client to play a game, and if you read their Gamer's Bill of Rights* you'd know that
so no, Sins doesn't have DRM. and yes, Stardock is a good company who know how to treat customers (while still out to make a tidy profit)
* here are the most relevant rights to your points that they say gamers should have:
# Gamers shall have the right to demand that download managers and updaters not force themselves to run or be forced to load in order to play a game.
# Gamers shall have the right to expect that games won’t install hidden drivers or other potentially harmful software without their consent.
# Gamers shall have the right to not be treated as potential criminals by developers or publishers.
# Gamers shall have the right to demand that a single-player game not force them to be connected to the Internet every time they wish to play.
# Gamers shall have the right that games which are installed to the hard drive shall not require a CD/DVD to remain in the drive to play.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]