This Sounds Familiar: The Death Of Newspapers... 91 Years Ago
from the heard-that-one-before dept
We've been reading all these "obituaries" for newspapers, with people whining and complaining about what a huge loss it is and how democracy will suffer. To many of us, we've been hearing these complaints for quite some time... but perhaps we didn't realize that they go way back to at least 91 years ago. Romenesko points us to a story in Slate discussing an article from 1918 lamenting how many newspapers were dying off, and how it would be that much more difficult to keep politicians in check with fewer newspapers watching their every move. And... that was back in the days of yellow journalism and corrupt politicians who had an even chummier relationship with certain publishers than they do today. All in all, the point should be clear: just because some newspapers go out of business, it doesn't mean the end of journalism. It never has.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: history, newspapers, trouble
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
you'll get a blank stare. when newspapers were around and doing their jobs, they were able to penetrate localities and let people know what was happening not just in their neighborhood, but state and nation. not just who the mayor of new york and the president are.
real journalism is already dead.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yup
Yeah, because that doesn't happen these days. That's why we get such stellar reporting out of the dinosaurs who are bitching about their importance.
Nighty-night y'all. Hope you got enough money to make your eternal slumber worth-while. (Failing that, you could always apply for a bailout. Assuming your political chits are still worth anything.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Yup
Didn't say it doesn't happen today, but it was absolutely much more extreme in those days.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Newspaper dead?
As for asking the average American about the political process, I think people are becoming more informed about political issues now more than ever. Everyone has an opinion and thanks to technology it has become much easier to express.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think newspapers will die off fairly soon. That doesn't mean I believe news won't be reported though. Of course it'll be reported.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Never underestimate the power of ego.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]