Spanish File Sharing Admin Sent To Jail... Despite Not Breaking The Law
from the not-so-good dept
I missed this story last week, but it's an important one to cover. The entertainment industry has been bragging about its various "wins," but when you look closely at them, many of them are questionable. For example, there were some news stories recently about how the operator of a file sharing site called InfoPSP in Spain was sentenced to 6 months in jail. However, TorrentFreak looked more closely at the case, and realized that the guy in question didn't actually commit a crime at all and was simply pressured into a plea bargain. That's because Spanish courts have made clear that it's not illegal to just link to infringing content. However, after recognizing the costs to fight this in court, he simply agreed to the plea bargain deal:So a deal was done. Kuve would admit to being a criminal and accept the court's decision with the assurance that he wouldn't be chased through the civil courts by the plaintiffs. Kuve and his lawyer decided that it would make sense, financially at least.It's quite troubling that the entertainment industry was able to send someone to jail, despite him not committing a crime, and can then use that "example" to try to show people how they, too, can go to jail. For an industry that keeps trying to take the moral high ground, you have to wonder how it can claim it's moral to send someone to jail despite not having broken the law?
"I am a student and therefore do not have the financial resources needed to hire a defense expert that could ensure results in the trial. Besides, continuing with the trial meant that the civil courts could convict me and I would be forced to pay financial compensation which I couldn't cope with," said Kuve.
"I would have loved to defend my interests to the end and it is for this that I wish all the people in my situation who can afford to stay and fight for something that affects us all, the best of luck."
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: file sharing, plea bargain, spain
Companies: infopsp
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I AM an American, a true Patriot, and as such, I have the power and guts to call out the power mad assholes, up to and including President Bush, and say in a clear and defiant voice: "You are all a bunch of thugs who dragged the flag and name of my country through the ground. You destroyed my rights, you tortured people in my name. I am not going to stand by and allow you to have a free pass! This ends here. I want my rights back for me and my fellow countrymen. It is time someone pays a price for what they have done."
If anyone else else wants to help speak out against the torture then please sign the petition that the ACLU is distributing so that justice is served: http://www.aclu.org/investigatetorture
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
As far as the torture issue of detainees... don't be so quick to judge... until they release the intel we gathered from the questionable techniques and show that there was nothing gained, I consider nothing lost.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
You heard it folks. Some people are worth more than others, and so torture can be used on the ones we consider to be less human than us.
Well , Im not surprised. The Chinese and the Russians do the same thing. I guess for USA to stay competitive , we have to do the same as well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
> more than others
Yes, some people *are* worth more than others. I know it probably shocks your enlightened leftist conscience to hear someone say it, but there it is.
The animals who fly planes into buildings, blow up buses full of children, and saw the heads off people with dull knives merely because they were born in a different part of the world aren't worth jack shit. They certainly aren't worth as much as decent civilized people of the world.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
No , for me they are just some demented idiots spawned by syphilitic whores , and who deserve to be killed.
BTW you reap what you sown
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
With that kind of thinking, I'd say you're no better than they are. I bet a little water boarding would do you a world of good.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Defending civil liberties (you know it's the American Civil Liberties Union, right?)... protecting the Constitution... standing up for people getting trampled by their government... that degrades our society? How?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Yah, civil liberties are FAR left and a joke, huh? The Constitution is not something from which you pick and choose the pieces you like to selectively apply when you want.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Note, that all subjects to this "torture" are alive AND still have all hands/legs/ears/etc.
Next time, before you embarrass yourself, come to Prague, and visit "Torture Museum". THAT is torture. What CIA did is ugly interrogation.
Make no mistake, they will do it AGAIN. Just because there's no other ways to convince Afghan guys to collaborate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
1) These people are "questionable", aka we suspect they may be guilty of something, or have some information we want.
2) We didn't actually kill or dismember them
3) Other people in history have done more despicable things
4) We couldn't figure out how else to get our way
I hope people like you are no longer in charge.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
You link to the ACLU, but no matter what you think, the ACLU wants to take rights away from certain Americans if they don't have the same leftist agenda that that ACLU has, so the ACLU can go screw itself, too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
I ARE SO COOL I USE TEH GRAMMORZ LOLOL
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
You cry about the erosion of civil liberties while men sit in caves in pickastan and plot your death.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
"Any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. It does not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful sanctions."
it explicitly states that there are NO exceptions whatsoever to using torture, even saying outright that
"This includes any threat of terrorist acts or violent crimes as well as armed conflict, international or non-international. The committee is deeply concerned at and rejects absolutely any efforts by states to justify torture and ill-treatment as a means to protect public safety or avert emergencies in these and all other situations."
That pretty clearly says there are no exceptions to the law we signed, we even have two members on the committee against torture.
what we are talking about is clearly against the law, no questions asked.
So why do you think we shouldn't investigate, and if necessary prosecute, everyone involved? What makes us any better than those we profess to fight at that point? What does it say about the american people if we don't step up and make sure justice is carried out? These people potentially broke the law, and we need to investigate it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Convention against Torture
I call into question "clearly" against the law; since Iraq and Iran have articles of their Constitutions that indicate torture as an appropriate response to gain information or gain a confession where appropriate. Cuba didn't ratify CAT until 1995. iraq's President was elected by Iraq's people, in which CAT defines we can not send people back to a country that will torture the returnees. The Terrorists are detained not by the US, but by the Articles of CAT, they can not leave Cuba for fear of them being tortured and hanged like Saddam.
CATCH 22.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
but as far as what this post is about, this will make more and more people bitter about the music industry and less likely to support it. i don't see how this type of tactics can benefit them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
The Bush administration was the one that didn't keep us safe on 9-12-01. Think about that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Ummm... this might be the revelation for you, but Bush hasn't been a President for, what, 6 months already :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
if it makes any different, I fully support them examining Obama's role in any torture that may have occurred.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
If you really were in the military, than you would know that your job was to defend him, me, your family, and all of the other people in the country from enemies BOTH foriegn and domestic.
If you claim to be a true patriot of a Democratic country, than you must know that to ensure your right to speak out about things *you* dont like, you have to support the rights of others to speak out, even if you dont the opinions they are expressing.
Anything else makes you a hypocrit of the highest order.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
The right of peopel to voice their opinions is enshrined in the Constitutional Framework of Free Speech. And you, who swore to uphold that very same constitution, would begrudge a fellow citizen that right just because they didnt have the same job as you?
You my friend, are the reason this country is falling apart. You are the cancer that is eating the living soul of this once great nation. You are to blame because despite your oaths to protect, you spit on your fellow citizens for the crime of thinking differently than you.
Only dictitorial regimes actually criminalize such speach, but thats exactly what you are preaching: my way or the highway.
You have betrayed your oaths, your constition, and your country. Don't you feel the shame?
FC3 Zepp, U.S.S. Wisconsin BB64 (retired 86-95)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Then allow me to comment. I served in the U.S. Navy from 1989-1991, spending most of my time aboard the U.S.S Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71). Participant of Operation Desert Storm.
Stick to the topic and stay away from things you know nothing about which is politics.
The AC has some merit. As an American, and one who has defended this nation, I find it sick and appalling our businesses are taking their draconian views and forcing embargoes or other blackmail options to impose "copyright" protection.
Usually at the expense of innocent people.
Don't you dare sit there and tell me I shouldn't feel this way, or to dismiss it.
Whether its putting 4 innocent people away for "copyright infringement" or causing tensions to allow people to fly planes into our buildings, there's no dispute the actions of this country are doing more harm than good.
Then, to see this news come out, really makes me wonder about the "freedom" of this country.
Or, rather, the "protection of profits".
It's quite clear this young man had no choice but to agree to his "punishment."
If this makes you proud to be an American, you make me sick.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
And btw, for all the people who say "A little torture is okay, just keep people from blowing us up" and "America is fighting for liberty" and "the intel is worth the torture"....FUCK YOU!
It's that dickhead mentality that had me fighting in the sand, and it's that callous attitude for human life that put ME and my fellow soldiers in harms way. Until you've seen some of the bullshit our country pulls across the world, you simply have no idea what you're talking about. You'd be fucking SHOCKED at how sanitized our news reports are.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Torture
> least bit surprised, but what do you expect
> from a country that allows torture? the
> actions that this country does in my name
> are making me sick.
Which country are you talking about, genius? Because this file-sharing case happened in Spain, not the USA. And Spain doesn't allow torture. They're one of those holier-than-thou enlightened European countries that condemn the USA for everything.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
justice
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He won't go to jail
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: He won't go to jail
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's A Fair Cop
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It's A Fair Cop
Hypothetical: You moved into a wealthy neighborhood, but drive a shitty dented up honda instead of a BMW or Audi. Now the Neighbors are taking you to court because they belive you are runining their proerty value. They win, and you go to jail.
How is this any different than what this article is about? Wealthy content owners prosecuting a man who by the very definition of the court has commited no crime, criminal or civil, and yet was able to force him into a conviction.... just because he is supposedly undermining the value of their content?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It's A Fair Cop
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: It's A Fair Cop
Um, even I took it as face value.
Maybe a "/sarcasm" next time would help.
:)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: It's A Fair Cop
How could you take that seriously? This guy is saying to punish everybody for doing things in accordance with the law. If you don't detect that as sarcasm, then do you take everything at face value?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: It's A Fair Cop
"/sarcasm" never hurts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: It's A Fair Cop
AC, if it was indeed sarcasm, then I offer my appologies for not detecting it, but for the record, it really did come off as something a far right-winger would preach about on here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
David v Goliath
The market, both Spanish and global, may see these actions against these poor little guys and think 'Hey, you big multinational corporation (Goliath), let that poor kid (David) live his life".
All this does is encite further anger toward the Music Industry. We feel sorry for the kid and wish him all the best. And you know, we ALL love the underdogs...
If you start to hate the Music Industry, why would you be motivated to give it money?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ?
I was wondering the same thing...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ?
And yes, I'm a citizen of the same-said country.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The pirate bay trial
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The pirate bay trial
Screw that! I would rather have an appeal win, with prejudice (if it exists in Sweden), so this never becomes an issue again.
:)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
P2P and crimes
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
File Sharing Sites in the US
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
On the "torture" debate that ensued thereafter...
1)It's not torture in the same way "torture" has been traditionally defined, I actually do prefer the term "harmful interrogation" or something of the sort.
That being said, that doesn't mean it's justified. Some stress positions, sleep deprivation, etc., is fine IF (and that's a big if) it produces results.
2) It is highly debatable as to whether water-boarding (the most controversial)is effective.Long time FBI, CIA, and military interrogators are all on the record as saying it doesn't work. Then you have political figures and Agency heads saying it's effective. If that doesn't muddy the waters enough, you have a partial release of documents, which clarifies nothing, and intentional or not, makes the move by President Obama seem politically motivated.
3) Just because I don't agree with waterboarding doesn't put me on the side of the ACLU. Even if it did, LIKE THEM OR NOT, that doesn't make you a traitor. It means you actually can hold your own views and opinions.
4)All Partisan bickering and hacks is sickening, pointless, and more damaging to our nation than most care to realize.
This whole either/or black/white crap is really childish, and frankly far afield of reality. I'm no moral relativist, but that doesn't mean that all issues are binary. Get a clue you ignorant fools.
RANT END.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You left out a few, like mock executions, electric shocks (especially to the genitals), ass-rape (NYPD style with a stick, of course), etc.
It is highly debatable as to whether water-boarding (the most controversial)is effective. Maybe not, but it sure is fun!
Just because I don't agree with waterboarding doesn't put me on the side of the ACLU.
You must be a terrorist then.
All Partisan bickering and hacks is sickening, pointless, and more damaging to our nation than most care to realize.
It's the liberals and the ACLU that are destroying our nation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
SPANISH File Sharing Admin Sent To Jail... Despite Not Breaking The Law
NOT AMERICAN. SPANISH. READ FIRST, RANT LATER.
GOT IT?
GOOD.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
/Sarcasm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Spain blows
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
/sarcasm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Feh this should never happen
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]