From Infinite To Scarce: xkcd Goes The Book Route
from the the-way-things-work-these-days dept
A bunch of folks have been sending in the NY Times story about how the online comic xkcd is going to be putting out a book, and that it's being done avoiding the traditional book publishing process. There are some key quotes in there, including:In fact, the xkcd story previews the much more likely future of books in which they are prized as artifacts, not as mechanisms for delivering written material to readers. This is print book as vinyl record -- admired for its look and feel, its cover art, and relative permanence -- but not so much for convenience.And then there's the more important point about Randall Munroe not worrying about copying of the content -- and instead focusing on the other direction:
Publishing a book is an extension of the selling of items like T-shirts and posters, which pays the bills, he said, to a "free culture" mind-set about the cartoons themselves. "We have been encouraging people to share things, saying that it is a good business decision," he said....It's been clear from pretty much the beginning that Munroe understands that getting more widely known is a lot more important than worrying about "piracy," and it's great to see him take that attitude even further.
One trick in transferring the material from online to print has been how to recreate the "title text" that comments on the strip when your cursor hovers over it.
"It's not supposed to be a punch line, but hopefully if you didn't laugh, you'll laugh at this," he said. The title text will appear where the tiny copyright notice would appear on a traditional strip.
Does that mean that the book won't carry a traditional copyright and instead take its lead from the online comic strip itself, which Mr. Munroe licenses under Creative Commons, allowing noncommercial re-use as long as credit is given?
"To anyone who wants to photocopy, bind, and give a copy of the book to their loved one -- more power to them," he said. "He/She will likely be disappointed that you're so cheap, though."
![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: book, infinite, randall munroe, scarcity, xkcd
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What about his blag?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: lack of history in mainstream media
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: lack of history in mainstream media
Plus, the books usually have bonus content in them!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
punch line?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
XKCD supporter
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I bought the user friendly books too.
Having the physical artifact is cool enough to be worth the money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Beauty!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It pays for the apartment, posting [webcomics], and enough so I can still have an electric skateboard," Munroe said with a laugh."
("It" being selling T-shirts and speaking engagements, at the time).
It's his prerogative to keep such information to himself, but the reason I'm curious is because if at least one room in his house doesn't resemble Uncle Scrooge's Money-Bin, I'd be fairly sad. He certainly brings a lot more to society than most people I know, including me, but my (much more mundane) job covers the apartment, an electric skateboard, truly inimitable health insurance, and a lot of disposable income aside. If he isn't substantially wealthier than I am (and I am not), then I'm kind of bummed.
Wikipedia lists about 30 self-supporting Webcomics: that is, about 30 people are known to make their living doing businesses primarily surrounding their Webcomics. According to that page, it counts not just income from the comics directly (e.g., advertising income from their sites) but also ancillary businesses like selling books and T-shirts, plus donations.
But only 30? Is that number just exceedingly low? Shouldn't the long tail show us many more - orders of magnitude more? 30 is about the same number of comics I'd see in the Sunday paper; so is there really only enough economic room for the top 30 comic-drawers? And are the "superstars" of the Webcomics world just superstars on the Web - but struggling to make ends meet in real life?
If the number is low, fine - what's the real number? Are these top 30 really real-life superstars, banking their millions? If not, why? Are they just unable to come up with business models that can turn hundreds of thousands of fans into hundreds of thousands of dollars? And what do we tell the artists that aren't in the top 30 or even 300?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: real world economics of webcomics
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I am not much of a comics reader, but I can't believe that there was ever more than a couple of dozen "dailies" (Peanuts, Family Circus, Mary Worth, Garfield, Far Side, Tank McNamara, ...)
Am I missing something? I personally can't see regularly following more than a dozen or so comics at any given time. What time I would have devoted to comics in the past, I now spend following other things (blogs, techdirt, etc.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]