From Infinite To Scarce: xkcd Goes The Book Route

from the the-way-things-work-these-days dept

Mon, Apr 20th 2009 4:59pm — Mike Masnick

A bunch of folks have been sending in the NY Times story about how the online comic xkcd is going to be putting out a book, and that it's being done avoiding the traditional book publishing process. There are some key quotes in there, including:

In fact, the xkcd story previews the much more likely future of books in which they are prized as artifacts, not as mechanisms for delivering written material to readers. This is print book as vinyl record -- admired for its look and feel, its cover art, and relative permanence -- but not so much for convenience.

And then there's the more important point about Randall Munroe not worrying about copying of the content -- and instead focusing on the other direction:

Publishing a book is an extension of the selling of items like T-shirts and posters, which pays the bills, he said, to a "free culture" mind-set about the cartoons themselves. "We have been encouraging people to share things, saying that it is a good business decision," he said....

One trick in transferring the material from online to print has been how to recreate the "title text" that comments on the strip when your cursor hovers over it.

"It's not supposed to be a punch line, but hopefully if you didn't laugh, you'll laugh at this," he said. The title text will appear where the tiny copyright notice would appear on a traditional strip.

Does that mean that the book won't carry a traditional copyright and instead take its lead from the online comic strip itself, which Mr. Munroe licenses under Creative Commons, allowing noncommercial re-use as long as credit is given?

"To anyone who wants to photocopy, bind, and give a copy of the book to their loved one -- more power to them," he said. "He/She will likely be disappointed that you're so cheap, though."

It's been clear from pretty much the beginning that Munroe understands that getting more widely known is a lot more important than worrying about "piracy," and it's great to see him take that attitude even further.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: book, infinite, randall munroe, scarcity, xkcd

17 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 20 Apr 2009 @ 5:53pm

I'm buying this book!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Matt T., 20 Apr 2009 @ 5:58pm

What about his blag?
On both the xkcd blag and the store, it doesn't say anything about this book. Given the relative infrequency with which he updates it, it'll probably show up in the next couple of days. Sigh... I'm definitely buying this book.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Trevlac, 20 Apr 2009 @ 6:06pm

Love xkcd. Glad to hear there will be a book and I'm buying it. THRICE.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Osno, 20 Apr 2009 @ 6:39pm

Randall will sell the first 10.000 in a few hours. I own several of his t-shirts, and I know I'd buy one (or more) if I were in the US, right away. Glad for him, and hope I can buy one on the second batch very soon!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous, 20 Apr 2009 @ 7:10pm

The book can't fail any harder than the comic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Alex Austin (profile), 20 Apr 2009 @ 7:21pm
  
  Re:
  You obviously don't know the extent to which geeks idolize Monroe. Of course, only real geeks truly understand most of his humor.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 20 Apr 2009 @ 7:26pm
  
  Re:
  Considering how massively popular the comic is, I'd say this is an anti-fail.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
InstinctSage, 20 Apr 2009 @ 8:40pm

While I doubt I'll buy the xkcd book, it's just the latest in an ongoing trend. Chris Onstad has been selling Achewood books for years, and I'm certainly interested in getting a copy of Rice Boy, despite the entire thing also being free on the internet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- harknell, 21 Apr 2009 @ 4:08am
  
  Re: lack of history in mainstream media
  My first thought in reading the article was "man, these print guys are clueless". As you point out, webcomics have been printing "dead tree" editions of their comics for up to 10 years now. Hell, Penny Arcade are now into how many volumes? PVP online has how many printed comic books? You can't throw a stick without hitting a webcomic who has a book out there. And for the most part they are self-printed (excepting the 2 guys above mentioned done by Darkhorse). Kind of late to the game guys.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Xanthir, FCD, 21 Apr 2009 @ 5:23am
    
    Re: Re: lack of history in mainstream media
    Nod, I was just thinking that. I bought books from my favorite webcomic artists years ago, and I continue to do so now. As Mike said, it's just one more scarcity they can make money off of.
    
    Plus, the books usually have bonus content in them!
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 20 Apr 2009 @ 11:35pm

punch line?
I didn't know before this article that xkcd had hover-punch lines. I'll need to go back and revisit every comic!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
lordmorgul, 20 Apr 2009 @ 11:52pm

XKCD supporter
I will be paying for this book, probably more than 1 copy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DaveL, 21 Apr 2009 @ 12:33am

I'll be buying a copy.

I bought the user friendly books too.
Having the physical artifact is cool enough to be worth the money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yeebok (profile), 21 Apr 2009 @ 2:31am

Beauty!
Mate, I am so in the queue for that one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Apr 2009 @ 3:07am

I would honestly love to know how well Randall Munroe is doing financially. He's certainly coy about it; from this article:

It pays for the apartment, posting [webcomics], and enough so I can still have an electric skateboard," Munroe said with a laugh."

("It" being selling T-shirts and speaking engagements, at the time).

It's his prerogative to keep such information to himself, but the reason I'm curious is because if at least one room in his house doesn't resemble Uncle Scrooge's Money-Bin, I'd be fairly sad. He certainly brings a lot more to society than most people I know, including me, but my (much more mundane) job covers the apartment, an electric skateboard, truly inimitable health insurance, and a lot of disposable income aside. If he isn't substantially wealthier than I am (and I am not), then I'm kind of bummed.

Wikipedia lists about 30 self-supporting Webcomics: that is, about 30 people are known to make their living doing businesses primarily surrounding their Webcomics. According to that page, it counts not just income from the comics directly (e.g., advertising income from their sites) but also ancillary businesses like selling books and T-shirts, plus donations.

But only 30? Is that number just exceedingly low? Shouldn't the long tail show us many more - orders of magnitude more? 30 is about the same number of comics I'd see in the Sunday paper; so is there really only enough economic room for the top 30 comic-drawers? And are the "superstars" of the Webcomics world just superstars on the Web - but struggling to make ends meet in real life?

If the number is low, fine - what's the real number? Are these top 30 really real-life superstars, banking their millions? If not, why? Are they just unable to come up with business models that can turn hundreds of thousands of fans into hundreds of thousands of dollars? And what do we tell the artists that aren't in the top 30 or even 300?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- harknell, 21 Apr 2009 @ 4:04am
  
  Re: real world economics of webcomics
  If you pull back a bit and remove the word webcomic from the question (so it's now, how many non-big business people make their full money around simply updating a website) it becomes a bit more obvious that the numbers can't be absolutely huge. The webcomic that I'm a part of makes money, but I have a regular job as does Onezumi in addition. The question also comes down to how much you need to make a year before you consider it enough to be the only thing you do. Many webcomic people live in the south, mid west, or other locations that cost way less than NJ where we live. You would have to make way more to live in NJ. In most cases people treat their online comic work as a secondary small business that rakes in a decent return.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- mobiGeek, 21 Apr 2009 @ 8:18am
  
  Re:
  How many dead-tree comic artists exist today, or at any given time in the past?
  
  I am not much of a comics reader, but I can't believe that there was ever more than a couple of dozen "dailies" (Peanuts, Family Circus, Mary Worth, Garfield, Far Side, Tank McNamara, ...)
  
  Am I missing something? I personally can't see regularly following more than a dozen or so comics at any given time. What time I would have devoted to comics in the past, I now spend following other things (blogs, techdirt, etc.)
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]