Political Candidate Drops Out Of Race Due To Racy Facebook Photos
from the that-was-quick dept
It really was just three years ago when we were saying we couldn't wait for the MySpace generation to run for office, knowing that the skeletons in their closets wouldn't actually be in their closets at all, but would have been posted online for all to see. While we actually expected that it would lead to a point where people pretty much brushed off and ignored such "youthful indiscretions," we certainly have't reached that point yet. A guy running for office in British Columbia, Canada, has dropped out of the election after images of him groping a woman's breast (that first appeared on his Facebook page) came to light. It's not clear when the photos in question were taken, but expect to see political candidates and their online presence scrutinized in more and more detail in future elections...Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: campaigns, canada, politics, social networks
Companies: facebook
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Time will tell
Of course, I could be wrong. Maybe this will go away as soon as newspapers and tv are gone; sensationalizing trivial political things gets a whole lot harder without mainstream media.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nothing new, just evolved for the digital age
Press: (giggle)OK.
Bill Clinton if he was of the Internet Generation: I didn't inhale.
Press (or maybe just Fox News and some bloggers): But, Mr. Clinton, you posted photos of yourself at a party with what looks like you breathing in air from an apparatus that contains water and a gree substance that is alleged to be marijuana.
Bill Clinton: Check out my saxophone playing ... (sidles off).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Youthful Indescretions
It would not make a difference to many voters, but the NDP are a strange, flaky, lefty, politically correct bunch and even though the woman in the picture seemed a willing participant the NDP do not wish to alienate the core "anything with a penis is evil" membership. If he were gay and the picture was of him kissing a man the NDP would have fought to the death for candidate Ray Lam.
Everything you do on the Internet is for all to see. If it would get you arrested, upset your mother now, upset you in twenty years, or get you to drop out of an election - don't do it.
As a final note: Ray, gettin' some fine trim player!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Youthful discression?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
With employers now routinely checking MySpace and Facebook pages before deciding to hire someone, I'm glad we never got around to taking that photograph and posting it online.
It wouldn't have been obscene - but it sure would have been complicated as hell to explain to a boss, future in-laws or God knows who else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This ain't a real story; Is it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
don't call private people "weird"
What?!?!? Wanting dignity, and wanting to keep your private life private, should be regarded as "weird"? I'm a little worried about comments like that. The suggestion that young people who don't want to make exhibits of themselves are weird and should "get with the program" is actually a new and pernicious form of conformity, where you have to be an extravert and exhibitionist to play a part in society. As a natural introvert and non-showoff I find this disturbing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: don't call private people "weird"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
not the first or last example of this idiocy
The main lesson from this is that posting info/iamges about yourself online is no different in principle from any other publication, and the same rules of sensible communciation apply. And that freedom doesn't mean absolution from the consequences of your actions. This isn't the first example of such idiocy, and it won't be the last.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
re: My "Weird" comment
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]