My Keynote At The (RIAA Sponsored) Leadership Music Digital Summit
from the fun-stuff dept
In mid-March, I had the pleasure of giving the second day keynote talk at the Leadership Music Digital Summit. It was a lot of fun, and generated some really fascinating discussions (as always). There was a lot of demand to get the video online, and I wanted to thank the team at Leadership Music (Kira and Abby) and Matt Houser who volunteered to put together the video with my slides, which you can see on the media page or embedded below:Leadership Music Digital Summit 2009 - Mike Masnick keynote address, 3/25/09 from Leadership Music Digital Summit on Vimeo.
If you've seen my earlier Midemnet presentation, this is actually an extended and improved version of that, so part of it will already be quite familiar to you. However, the final 10 minutes of the presentation gives me an opportunity to respond to the biggest question that came after the original presentation: how does this work for less well known musicians. So, I went through five different musicians, who all come from different backgrounds and experiences, representing different "success levels" in the industry, to show that this basic concept of connecting with fans, giving them a reason to buy (and not freaking out about piracy) works quite well.
You'll note at the beginning of the presentation, I note that the RIAA was a major sponsor of the event, and there was a huge RIAA logo hanging over my head (not seen in the video). The RIAA also sponsored the lunch following my keynote. While I actually did end up talking to representatives from all four of the major record labels while in Nashville (with... um... very, very, very different reactions from reps from each label, from outright frosty, to curious, to very interested and engaging), no one from the RIAA itself actually said hello. Too bad.
In the meantime, there are a bunch of new events I'll be speaking at in the coming months (all doing very different presentations), and I'll be putting up a post detailing some of those in the near future as well -- and I hope to meet more readers and Techdirt/Insight Community participants at these events.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: business models, jill sobule, jonathon coulton, josh freese, keynote, moto boy, trent reznor
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Another example of "do it alone" success
I recently came across another success story about a 5-year old band called "Metric". They recently self-financed their 5th CD. This time, they did so without a label, and their music is doing pretty well, in fact it's placing in the upper #30s of pop/rock sales, according to Nielsen.
The band manager had this to say:
"Talking gross numbers that come directly to the band, we have made more money already than we have on the last record in four years," said Mathieu Drouin, the band's co-manager. "Without any intermediary, we're making 77 cents on the dollar for every record we sell" on iTunes. Under a label deal... Metric would have earned closer to 22 cents on the dollar
Read the store at The LA Times
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Another example of "do it alone" success
Yup, we wrote about them too:
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090420/1108054566.shtml
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Another example of "do it alone" success
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Punks everywhere
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Punks everywhere
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Punks everywhere
Because your attack on his looks really sounds like that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Many Slide Technique
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
On the fence on the presentation technique
I've spent a lot of time trying to understand this newer "Lessig-esque" technique, which may work well within academia where this audience is often "trained" for information overload. Thusly, the goal of a student is to better prioritize facts based on the contextual subject matter is easy and works especially well in an academic setting where students know the context going in (ala Course Syllabus).
When speaking to left-brained people such as artists, a Steve Jobs-type technique where your engaging with the audience and sharing genuine holistic thought may be helpful. Expect to spend 2-3 minutes per slide, have narrative for each slide, and use flashy transitions, but keep colors to a minimum. Let your presentation complement, but not overtake the speech. This audience often wants to leave a talk seeking something different than the academic, more holistic in a way.
When speaking with right-brained business types, a technique with many charts and very data driven with facts, bullet points and citations is extremely helpful. In this case, consider allowing 5-7 minutes per slide, and allow your narrative describe the data. Also, try to leave 10% of the presentation time for a question-and-answer session for any clarification.
In any situation, slide titles that begin with questions, and can engage something of a Socratic method, can also be helpful.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: On the fence on the presentation technique
But the surprise addition of a third thing: the Takahashi Presentation Method, throws a monkey wrench in being able to understand the presenter and subject matter.
I understand the creativity, but it may be too complex and foreign for those in the industry, who come to learn about you and the findings of your studies. Unless, of course, your a brilliant person (which I believe you are) and desire to not speak to the business-as-usual crowd. :-)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: On the fence on the presentation technique
Moreover, you are advocating Mike do the classic kind of ppt presentation that is associated with "Death by Powerpoint". You are wrong if you think that is better than what he does.
Mike is moving slides quickly, to keep people engaged, awake, and seeing visual reinforcement for the same things he is saying orally. He uses repetition strategically to drive home the key points. People learn from seeing, hearing, and above all, repetition.
It slays me to hear you suggest this is an "Academic" style just because Lessig uses it and he's a prof. I don't know what awesome school you went to, but when I went to the best school in Canada, and the Ivy league, very few profs delivered as dynamic and interesting presentation as this. The "Academic style" that actually is the standard is more reminiscent of Ben Stein's character in Ferris Bueller's Day Off.
I suppose we're free to disagree on this, but I think this style is refreshing and engaging. You like flashy transitions and 2-7 minutes per slide. To each their own.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: On the fence on the presentation technique
Oops. Sorry. You’re correct! I think I have dyslexia!
Moreover, you are advocating Mike do the classic kind of ppt presentation that is associated with "Death by PowerPoint".
I am merely sharing an observation that Mike has a lot of subject matter to cover in any 30-minute span of time. Instead of trying to sell the whole pie using a technique that facilitates it, the technique may be viewed as foreign and with a foreign idea may have an exponential effect on the entire presentation.
You are wrong if you think that is better than what he does.
Derek, I'm real apathetic to what happens. It's nice that he has you on his team! But, I think your reading too much into it. It's intent but to be more constructive in nature. That said, the intent was never meant that way. If I didn't want to see Mike succeed, I wouldn't have offered anything at all.
Foreign Presentation Technique multiplied by Foreign Subject Matter may have an exponential effect on hurdles to adoption. Knowing this, I've had to rebuild presentations from 20 or 30 slides to 3 or 4 many, many, many times during the 11th hour based on new information about who I'm presenting to and own in-house style. My goal is often adoption of a concept, not how creative I can get. Because of this, I've learned to be quite cognizant of who the audience is well ahead of presenting, and any presentation formats they are already used to.
You mention death by PowerPoint, I mention paralysis by analysis.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: On the fence on the presentation technique
I have to say, my experience has been the exact opposite. The presentation itself garners attention in part because of the style, and it's designed quite carefully to drive home certain points.
And it's worked. The response to these presentations has been phenomenal, in finding people who actually got the concept. If I had done a boring typical presentation, that never would have happened. This method of presenting does two things that what you're advocating does not do, in my experience. (1) Get people to pay attention and (2) make the point quite clear and easy to understand.
I can say, quite certainly, that this method has been exponentially more effective than traditional styles of presentations.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Do You Like NIN
But that brings me to a question that I'm not sure if you have addressed: Do you like Reznor's music? I know it's not relevant to the discussion, and I appreciated the fact that you deal with the business, not the subjective art. But aside from the model debate, do you like the tunes?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Do You Like NIN
At this point, with several of their albums and EPs being legally available for exactly $0, that's more your choice than anything else.
I'd also say that whether you personally like NIN's music is neither here nor there when discussing business models. Perhaps if the models had failed and the music was significantly and objectively worse than their major label releases, we could inject a little "well the music was pretty bad so of course it failed". But given largely favourable reviews of the "free" releases compared to the previous label releases, the discussion can be made surrounding the models themselves without thinking about the quality of the music.
I hate modern American Idol-style pop music, but that wouldn't prevent me from appreciating the business tactics if such an "artist" were to try something different.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Do You Like NIN
Congratulations, and welcome to the "didn't get the obvious point club".
I make no subjective assesment of the art, since it is irrelevant. I am fully aware that not having heard NIN music is entirely my choice, and am neither happy or sad about that. I'm just surprised that I haven't come across it. Especially given that NIN is a fairly big act, judging by the numbers, and the bumper stickers I often see.
That fact, as you say, that it's "neither here nor there when you discuss business models" is....um...kinda covered by my mention of "I know it's not relevant to the discussion, and I appreciate the fact that you [Masnick] deal with the business, not the sujective art."
By correcting me using exactly the point that I clearly stated, you have brought exactly $0.00 value with your comment.
My question, thus, was merely an idle curiousity that I put to Mike. I think I made it abundantly clear that it is irrelevant to his frequent studies of Reznor. But I am curious, does Mike enjoy the music?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Inspiring.
I've always believed in giving away music free for a variety of reasons.
Thanks for giving some great examples about the value of CwF and RtB for unknown musicians like myself.
This is very inspiring and confirming.
Thank you!
Now it's back to work.
Roem
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nice presentation
Keep it up. Hope you make a difference! :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh Mike
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well Done
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wonderful
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gives me hope
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
thanks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Presentation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]