UK Says Street View Is Fine... As Canadian Politicians Get Worried About It

from the is-it-so-hard-to-understand dept

Mon, Apr 27th 2009 3:45pm — Mike Masnick

I'm not sure what it is about Google's Street View offering that so freaks people out. It's simply taking photos of public areas, not private properties. Yet, we already saw how folks in the UK freaked out about it, insisting that it must be illegal. Well, the UK's "privacy watchdog" has now announced that Google Street View is perfectly legal, so there's nothing to worry about. The group pointed out that there were significant safeguards in place, and any violation of privacy was minimal. Of course, there are still others who haven't quite realized this yet. Colin writes to alert us that politicians in Alberta, Canada are now the latest to worry about how Street View might violate privacy, with the Privacy Commissioner getting upset that Google had started taking photos in Alberta without first concluding talks with his office to make sure that everything was on the right side of the law.

Filed Under: canada, privacy, street view, uk
Companies: google

13 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Stephen Downes (profile), 27 Apr 2009 @ 4:27pm

Yeah, well, if I stood on the street outside your house and started taking photos into your livingroom window, you'd freak out too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Esahc (profile), 27 Apr 2009 @ 4:57pm
  
  Re:
  Can you post a link to said photos? I'd love to see them, because every street view photo I've seen are slightly out of focus and I can't even make out the gender of someone in another car let alone a residential window.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 27 Apr 2009 @ 5:03pm
  
  Re:
  "stood on the street outside your house and started taking photos"
  
  The state takes photos of your house for tax purposes, does that freak you out as well ? It's not like they wear special uniforms or anything, could be a freakin perv or somthin
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Apr 2009 @ 4:27pm

Scared about the wrong thing
It's funny how the UK citizens are worried about a public photo of their house being posted, but not as worried that their personally owned item rights of music, books, etc are slowly being taken away from them by the copy write police.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- TheStupidOne, 27 Apr 2009 @ 6:28pm
  
  Re: Scared about the wrong thing
  or that they are constantly being video recorded ... but you know, that's the government ... we know we can trust them
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 28 Apr 2009 @ 12:26am
    
    Re: Re: Scared about the wrong thing
    "but you know, that's the government ... we know we can trust them"
    That's a joke, right?
    
    The UK is so screwed when it comes to privacy that this doesn't surprise me at all. Granted I wasn't that concerned about StreetView before I heard about the complaints, but I'm almost surprised it isn't UK government policy to put security cameras in household bathrooms "For the children."
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Overcast, 27 Apr 2009 @ 7:03pm

or that they are constantly being video recorded ... but you know, that's the government ... we know we can trust them

Yep
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Enrico Suarve, 28 Apr 2009 @ 1:11am
  
  Re:
  Oi!! - you two
  
  Sarcasm was detected in you posts regarding our glorious government ("All hail Gordo - Hail")
  
  Report now for reconditioning
  
  The state is good
  The cameras are for your safety
  Protester = rioter
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Vincent Clement, 27 Apr 2009 @ 8:55pm

So, it's okay to have a product, like Google Earth or Google Maps, that shows my backyard in clear view. But taking pictures in a public place may not be okay, even if the technology blurs people faces and licence plates?

Someone should show the Privacy Commissioner the Flickr website.

Really, thousands of people are losing their jobs and this is what the governments in Canada are worried about?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Apr 2009 @ 9:04pm

The Albertan government are probably just worried that they're not getting any money for this activity... the Canadian mini-States are a bit short on cash at the moment and it wouldn't surprise me to see them try to swing a financial angle onto this issue.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cait, 27 Apr 2009 @ 9:48pm

This is just one of those things people get worked up about that I'll never understand, it seems. Taking pictures in public spaces is a logical, sensible right in most places. And, it's just a photo! Where are people seeing the harm? If you're doing something in your home in plain sight of people on the road that you don't want publicized, why are you doing so in plain sight? Do these also see harm in ending up in the background of a tourist photo that ends up on Flikr or Facebook? I just don't get it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Michael, 28 Apr 2009 @ 7:23am

Its the law.
In Canada, it is illegal to take my picture and use it for any commercial purpose without consent. That makes street view quasi illegal here. Its pretty simple really.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 10 May 2009 @ 10:33pm

@12.Micheal,

Keep in mind that Street View blurs people's faces. Google isn't using a person's image commercially.

There's no mentionable loss of privacy to the subject.
There's no loss of commercial value to the subject.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]