Movie Critic To Movie Industry: Wake Up, Start Giving Consumers What They Want
from the exactly dept
We're seeing a ton of bogus claims coming out of the UK lately about how movie piracy is somehow destroying the industry. So it's good to see not everyone is buying into these false statements. Gavin King points us to a great rant by Mark Kermode, a well known film critic in the UK who points out that piracy isn't a consumer problem, but an industry problem, because the industry still treats everyone like criminals (such as taking away mobile phones from viewers, not that anyone can film a whole movie on their phone) and refuses to give them what they want.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: critic, mark kermode, movie industry, uk
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Arclight In Los Angeles
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If you steal my identity, it's still mine, you're just using it without authorization. So, to a degree, I understand their point. If it's against the law (aka illegal), there's no gray area; it's illegal, end of story.
The problem is the fact that it IS illegal. Like King said, it's an industry problem. If the industry changes what they allow, then the law can stay the same and everyone moves on.
Back in the day, when a kid jumped over your white picket fence because it was a shortcut to the ball field, the worst you did was yell at him. If he kept it up YOU made a change to make both of you happy.
In the 80's/90's, the fist time that kid jumped the fence, you sued him for assault on helpless lifeforms (grass), and then you sued the parents for negligence.
Nowadays you sue the fence manufacturer for not making the fence high enough, and the painter for not using scuff-proof paint, and the contractor for not recommending chain-link.........
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Freestyle Rapping for charities
Something-something burning the cash!
Something-something shoved up their ass!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tw*ttards
Oh good, then those guys that attacked that ship will be relieved to know they arent Pirates, since no copying of copyrighted material was involved, only rape and murder and the stealing of actual, physical items under threat of death.
Is it any wonder so many people, not even us geeks, think the *IAA are out of touch with reality?
Morons.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
An Industry problem is an understatement
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anyway, it's interesting that Mum & Dad was brought up in this discussion, especially as the producers made money from me with that tactic. I missed the movie at Frightfest in London last year, but a lot of people talked about it very favourably. As I don't live in the UK at the moment, so I could not see the movie at the cinema when it was released. If there had been the traditional 3-6 month wait following the theatrical release, I may not have bothered seeing it until it was on TV (I get UK satellite TV). However, the simultaneous DVD release meant that I could order a copy fairly cheaply online and watch the movie while it was fresh in my mind. So, they made £10-ish from me whereas a traditional release schedule may have earned £0.
That should be the lesson for Hollywood. There's so many different ways to obtain media nowadays that it makes no sense to try to force people to view it in the way you happen to prefer. Give people the choice, make the options that are more profitable to you more attractive, and you will make money. Use a combination of draconian "protections" to try and force people to go to the cinema then DVD then TV, all in different countires at different times, and you only make the pirated options more attractive than the "real" thing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Theaters have little room to improve
That's a good idea, but I'm not sure what more they can do. As it is, the theater-going experience has become miserable, time-consuming, restrictive, and expensive. There isn't space here to go into all the reasons I say that, but it should be considered that it's not that difficult to have a good theater experience in the home these days.
For what a "night at the movies" can cost these days, it doesn't take long to justify some pretty nice home theater audio/video equipment. Then you don't have to deal with driving, parking, crowds, noise, social and behavioral restrictions, and exorbitant costs.
What can theaters do to improve that whole situation? They can't remove travel time/cost. They can't (effectively) control the crowds or noise, except through social and behavioral restrictions that make you uncomfortable yourself. Their costs are sky-high because Hollywood wants so much for licensing and the theater still has to light, heat, and equip the place, so they have to charge $5 for $.05 worth of popcorn.
I think the theater may be a dying breed. Outside the truly unique experience like IMAX, how can anyone justify seeing a standard movie at a theater? I know I can't. It'll be a cold day in hell before I ever go to a theater to see something again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
movie quality
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Movie Industry Bias
The open vagina opened shows shape like the male penis, yet society only allows the male penis to be visualized by teens and children on our television. They have made a mockery of the male body parts. Either show both or none at all! I'm sick of being surprised with male genitals and them flashing a boob. This is nowhere close to equality.
The whole rule about being erect is stupid. The movie Hall pass... the guy was fresh from being erect. ??? More and more men, yet not one of these regular new movies showing the female vagina open, and close up in daylight.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Böcek İlaçlama
[ link to this | view in chronology ]