How To Fool Apple's Arbitrary App Censors: Make Your App Look Cute
from the it's-all-about-appearances dept
Chris Wilcox, from Alkali Media, sends in (without a link, forcing us to go searching...) his story about his company created a somewhat crude iPhone app called (appropriately) "Crudebox." The app is nothing special -- just a sound box of semi-crude noises, not unlike some other apps out there. They were a bit surprised when the app was rejected for "objectionable" material. So, they reskinned the interface, to make it look a lot nicer, called it Prudebox and resubmitted it. The actual app (and all the sounds) were identical. And... of course, in Apple's arbitrary wisdom, they approved the new app and added it to the iPhone App Store.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: app store, censors, crudebox, iphone, prudebox
Companies: alkali media
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I didn't know they had arbitary censors
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I didn't know they had arbitary censors
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I didn't know they had arbitary censors
I read every day
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
mike pwned
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Crapple strikes again
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Crapple strikes again
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Crapple strikes again
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Reskinning" can make a difference
Changing "Vomit" to "Sicky", "Wet Fart" to "Big Toot", "Peeing" to "Piddle", etc. are the standard sort of shifts you would expect to get around being too crude/offensive.
Sure, changing the labels without changing the sound effects is a pretty shallow shift, but it does make the app less "objectionable".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "Reskinning" can make a difference
It's exactly what you would do to make something "cuter", which is what the article said.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The next test...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Time to port "Custer's Revenge" from my Atari!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Shows who the 'prude' is, doesn't it? Glad I didn't waste cash on this over controlled phone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I've never been much on Apple because of pricing, I looked at MacBooks and laughed at the price. However, after they dropped the price on the iPhone I was happy to pick one up. AT&T hasn't been too bad either which was my main drawback when I did buy it. It does pretty much everything I was looking for and I looked at and read about a lot of phones for several months. Personally, I can live without CrudeBox... PrudeBox, for that matter.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yeah, but the point is - why is Apple trying to dictate what apps you can load on your phone? It's a joke app - crude is what it's supposed to be.
It's past the point of 'protecting the stability' of the phone or whatever. It's more or less "corporate socialism".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
A more suitable argument would be to ask Apple to provide something like the ESRB if there were a demand for it. Then again I don't really look for stuff like this. I picked up a few soundboards like "That's What She Said" that just fell flat because it's not Michael Scott and really isn't funny without The Office context...obviously copyright issues there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Slow Day?
Mike, you usually have a decent argument whether I agree or not and if the labels were named the same I could probably see that point but they were changed. Put the same labels on PrudeBox or keep the Crudebox interface with the new labels and see what happens. It's a bit misleading since it just says "they reskinned the interface, to make it look a lot nicer" without any mention of the labels. You have to look at the, slightly hard to read, images to realize they were changed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Slow Day?
The labels are part of the interface. If you put the CrudeBox labels on the PrudeBox it wouldn't be the PrudeBox.
It's a bit misleading since it just says "they reskinned the interface, to make it look a lot nicer" without any mention of the labels.
Considering that the labels are part of the interface, then how's that? Heck, he even included pictures of both interfaces with their labels, and you're saying that it was misleading? Give me a break, fan boi.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Slow Day?
I'm anti-Apple all the way (I only say this to keep off any "fan-boi" attack), but I have to agree with the person you are responding to. We have no clue what the reasons for not accepting the app were. It could have been the green drippy buttons, or the name of the app, but it could also have been the terms on those buttoms ("Wet Fart" etc).
If the developer had JUST changed those strings, would the app have been accepted drippy buttons and all? It's not "arbitrary" to decline an app because it contains a string that is deemed inapropriate as much as it would be to decline it because it has green drippy buttons.
Regardless of what we think is right, Apple does own and run the store. Anything that is sold there, regardless of who it is developed for reflects upon Apple first. They even push this as a selling point. The commercials for the iPhone with their "... there's an app for that" forward the idea that it is these 3rd party apps that make the iPhone such a great device. Perhaps they've decided that "toot" is okay, but "wet fart" is not. You might say that it is "arbitrary" but we all draw a line somewhere, they just choose to be more conservative.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Slow Day?
Who said otherwise? Strawman down.
Anything that is sold there, regardless of who it is developed for reflects upon Apple first.
Then Apple sure must be a bad company because there are a lot of things there that aren't very nice, including PrudeBox. Eh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Slow Day?
I do like the phone though and the drops in pricing worked for me. Still love my Zune too. But apparently if you own a device from a particular company you're a "fan boi" but I get a cool spelling.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Slow Day?
Nah, "fan boi" is a title you have to earn, like by being defensive of criticism of your adopted consumer product or company, often times to the point of even mischaracterizing such criticism. Congratulations.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Slow Day?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The original also buttons dripping with green goo. The the approved one had little yellow flowers and a bunny rabbit. Awwww, look, isn't that just so cute?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
nothing that....
Developer: We polished our turd.
Apple: Thats better. You may now sell your turd on our site.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A quick question about apple iphone downloader/purchaser user app data?
Do apple developers/app writers get access to any consumer information (like e-mail address) for people who download their apps?
Thank you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]