Fact Checking? Newspapers Duped By Wikipedia Edit Again
from the nobody-fact-checks-any-more dept
Earlier this year, we noted how the press got caught relying on Wikipedia when they reprinted an error (amusingly, those press clippings were then used to "verify" the info in Wikipedia). It appears to have happened again. Clay Shirky points us to the news that a student in Ireland added a fake quote to the Wikipedia page of Maurice Jarre, a French musician who died in March. The student added the fake (but potentially real-sounding) quote soon after Jarre died, and many reporters apparently included the quote in their obituaries/writeups about Jarre. Of course, Wikipedia-haters may use this to point out the horrible questionable nature of Wikipedia content, but that's missing the point. Everyone knows that Wikipedia content should be considered suspect since anyone can edit it. It's a known quantity. For the most part, then, if you're a reporter, it should never be used as a sole source on something, but for background info that can also be checked elsewhere. The real issue was that the press didn't do this -- and didn't do their jobs in actually confirming the info.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: duped, journalists, maurice jarre, wikipedia
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Journalism
But that's why we need *real* journalists, and we need to prop up the debt-saddled institutions that support them. So that this kind of thing doesn't happen on *blogs,* but in self-authoritative periodicals where it belongs.
Right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Journalism
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Journalism
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Journalism
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Journalism
...but that's besides the point. As a college student, Wikipedia is great. I use it as starting point for the rest of my research, or I'll look up the references mentioned in the article. But yeah, most universities now won't let you use Wikipedia as a cited source.
I mean, if it's not good enough for universities, then why would a journalist think it's good for news?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Journalism
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Haha
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Critical thinking
[ link to this | view in chronology ]