What is Cyberbullying Anyway?
from the good-to-know-*before*-the-witch-hunt dept
We've been hearing a lot about "cyberbullying" lately. Cases like the Lori Drew incident have got politicians and teachers all over looking to pass vague new rules and laws (or twist existing ones) to punish behavior they feel is wrong. The problem is, no one really seems to be able to define the term, at least not in a way that really distinguishes it from simply being a jerk online, so it's encouraging to see a paper from a vice president of Stetson University, Darby Dickerson, calling on educators to slow down and define cyberbullying before creating policies about it, though I'm not sure she gets to the heart of the issue. Dickerson observes that people have been using the term often and easily, without any real consensus on what it includes and what it doesn't. In the absence of a generally accepted scholarly or legal definition, she calls on universities to take four steps before creating a cyberbullying policy:- consider the types of activity that might be included within the term,
- consider the type of harm,
- consider the level of intent required by the offender,
- determine the extent that it will address off-campus conduct.
Yet... Dickerson ignores one major consideration: why have a separate policy for cyberbullying anyway? It seems to me that in order to consider these issues sanely, we need to stop pretending they're separate things simply because we apply a "cyber" prefix to them. What's a "cyberthreat?" How is that different from a threat in general? Is a "cyberthreat" just a threat made online? What if it's made with a cell phone instead? What about a plain old telephone? Yes, the medium must be considered ("you're going to die" is different when shouted in a playground than written in letters cut out of a magazine...), but do we create separate terms or policies for each medium? We do often need to re-examine our laws and policies in the face of new technologies, but it rarely makes sense to have separate "cyberpolicies" instead of ensuring that existing policies are adapted to handle the new technologies. Why not ensure that existing harassment policies cover real harassment that occurs online instead of creating a new "cyberharassment" policy? Without a consideration of the difference between cyberbullying and bullying in general at the heart of this discussion, people run the risk of spending their energy blaming the technology and grandstanding, creating new policies with troubling unintended consequences rather than addressing the real issue, which often may well just be plain old bullying in a new context. The new context can certainly present new challenges that might warrant policy changes, but people should be careful not to get distracted from the issue of bullying just because it has "cyber" tacked onto the front.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: bullying, cyberbullying, regulations
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I'm in.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
grow up
lawmakers and teachers and ignorant lazy parents....
you guys all need your asses whooped.
if someone calls you a name or makes fun of you you have 2 choices in my book, you either A. shut the fuck up and ignore it or B. take them out back and handle it, and if you choose option B. you either kick their ass or get your ass handed to you either way the shit is settled.
plain and simple no need to make new laws and ruin our already shitty lives in this shitty country. damnit sometimes i wish i could be deported...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: grow up
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: grow up
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The "Cyber" Just Means Evidence
I suppose I'd rather be Cyber Bullied than bullied on the street on my way home from school.
I've seen the Chicken Littles saying that the Cyber variety is anonymous and more dangerous, but I find the old-fashioned kind of bullying to be more insidious because there is normally no evidence that it happened.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The "Cyber" Just Means Evidence
Sure, there's more evidence, but is that evidence accessible? (Identifying an anonymous user of a site usually has to have some legal basis.)
But, yeah, with "cyberbullying" you have lots of examples of dumb bullies who flaunt their acts online, like those four Italian kids who uploaded a video to YouTube of themselves taunting a disabled kid. Definitely some parallels, with bullies who might leave on online trail of their own stupid behaviour.
Some offline bullying can be more anonymous though. Leaving a letter in someone's locker (or graffiti on the outside) is going for public humiliation rather than private intimidation.
*shrugs*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The "Cyber" Just Means Evidence
I kindly request a CTIA Writeup.
NOW.
Thank you,
Anonymous Coward
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The "Cyber" Just Means Evidence
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pish!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cyberbullying
The schools rarely acknowledge that bullying goes on regularly in the schools. It does! They come up with hugely stupid responses like expelling both kids! The admins are often just dumber than a bag of hammers! Let a kid stand up to a bully and see what happens. The kid standing up for himself will get expelled.
The parents of the bullies are either completely blind to the problem or in Egypt i.e. DeNile. The first thing out of every rotten kids parents mouth is "He's a good boy or girl." Yeah, keep telling yourself that. The fact is the kid is a manipulator of the first order and needs a serious ass kicking. I'd like you to notice this problem has gotten much worse since parents stopped spanking their kids.
Life for the average kid is nothing but one big second chance. Never, never, never do these kids have actual consequences. My response to all this is bring back the draft, for boys AND girls. Put these kids in a situation where they are truly responsible and an ass kicking is the least of their worries! That will produce parents that understand how to handle bullies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cyberbullying
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Please...
It's what you point to when your kid, whom you haven't spent a whole lot of time with because, let's face it, he/she really isn't that pleasant, hangs/shoots/ODs/chokes/cuts/drowns him/her-self or goes on a shooting spree/joins a terrorist org/becomes a racist/doesn't get good grades/hiels Hitler/listens to metal/plays too much xBox rather than engage in what you deem to be constructive behavior.
It wasn't you and your parenting idiocy, nor was it your love of blaming everything on autism/ADD/ADHD/OCD/Marilyn Manson/Yoohoo Chocolate. It wasn't even all of the Ridilin/Xanex/etc. that you have stuffed down your little shit-stain's throat all of these years.
No, it was that other boy or girl that was reewy, reewy mean to your perfect little angel that actually STARTED the bullying.
Sigh, let's face it: there are people walking around on this earth that stemmed from loads that should have been swallowed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bullying
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I would suggest that an adult harassing a minor is a problem, cyber or not. Same with an adult impersonating a minor. I'm sure we already have laws for both. Let's just review the laws in place and make sure they're being used properly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Tgeigs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I would change...
Should read:
"you're going to die" is different when shouted in a playground than written in lamb's blood on your bedroom wall...
;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I would change...
I haven't seen elixirs of immortality yet...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
voice of reason
The voice of reason is seldom heard by those bellowing about all the good they are doing in your name.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Darby Dickerson...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Darby Dickerson...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Radical Parenting
http://www.radicalparenting.com/2009/04/30/guilt-bullies-8-ways-to-recognize-passive-agg ressiveness/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Radical Parenting
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lehDOuhpYRE
and would love for you to check it out and tell us what you think or repost if you like it,
Cheers, thanks for checking it out!
Gokce and the Teen Team
http://radicalparenting.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Radical Parenting
Read more: http://www.momlogic.com/2010/03/cyber_bullying_schools_should_be_held_accountable_ross_ellis_love_ou r_children_usa.php#ixzz0jmIdK75i
[ link to this | view in chronology ]