New FTC Chair's Views On Google, Broadband Competition And Behavioral Advertising
from the sounds-decent-so-far... dept
We've been receiving a series of different reports from different folks about a recent interview that new FTC boss, Jon Leibowitz, gave on CSPAN. Leibowitz has been in the FTC for a while, though, he's yet another former entertainment industry lobbyist in the administration (he was VP of Congressional Affairs for the MPAA from 2000 to 2004). So far, however, he seems to be taking quite reasonable positions on a variety of topics (though, some questionable views on other areas). Questioned about Google's dominance in the market (something that the FTC has been investigating for a while now), he pointed out that dominance is "the American way" and not necessarily an antitrust violation:Google has certainly has a dominant position in search advertising. There's no doubt about that. From our perspective, just having a dominant position doesn't in any way violate the law. It's if you do something -- as the Justice Department in the 1990s alleged that Microsoft did -- to exclude competitors illegally, that's when it becomes a problem.Then there's broadband competition, where he definitely does appear to be concerned about the lack of competition and the lack of transparency from current broadband providers:
If you get to a dominant position or a monopoly position by virtue of your own acumen, that's really the American way.
We believe consumers need to have notice and consent about what they're getting. It's very, very important that these providers tell consumers about the speed they're getting, and whether (ISPs) are making any types of management decisions in terms of the network that affect consumers....And, then, there's the question of behavioral advertising, where he believes that opt-in, rather than opt-out, makes a lot of sense:
In a perfect marketplace where you had more competitors, you wouldn't need the government necessarily to be terribly involved. Particularly in the consumer protection area, we have a big roll to play. Broadband is a deregulated product. That's good, we like deregulation generally. But when you have deregulation, you also have law enforcement to make sure people do the right thing.
I think some of the more enlightened companies do do opt-in. I think a lot of them don't. I think the better practice is always opt in.On the whole, then, he seems to not be too quick to bash companies for being successful, and seems to recognize that competition and transparency are important issues. Those are all good things. There are some fears however, that he's a bit quick on the trigger when it comes to regulating over that behavioral advertising issue, and doesn't seem to mind metered broadband, so long as customers know what they're getting.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: anti-trust, behavioral advertising, broadband, competition, ftc, jon leibowitz, transparency
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Ok, all this means is that you agree on some points, and disagree on others. Wow. Welcome to Earth.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The FTC has massive regulatory control over a number of issues impacting tech. I figured a lot of people might be interested in what the guy had to say...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
An internet connection isn't a god given right, and so long as ISP's advertise their products truthfully then you get what you sign up for.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Is it the government's job to force a company to deliver a certain product?
Why doesn't the consumer move somewhere else? Somewhere that *has* the services they want?
You can't go into Burger King, order a Big Mac, and expect to get one. Then, demand the government force Burger King to sell you one.
In the case you're describing, the government needs to tune the regulations and incentives, to make sure that profitable competition is possible in the market.
If there's money to be made, someone will step in to make it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I'd agree... except for the fact that thanks to regulations and gov't subsidies, it's not a private issue. The companies have relied on gov't money and support and rights of way to build their network with little competition. That gives them an unfair advantage to then do bad things with the network.
If there were actual competition, it wouldn't be an issue.
But there isn't... in part due to gov't activity. Thus, this is a space where unfettered abuse of their position should in fact be monitored by the gov't.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm happy for the new AG
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
eh, step in the right direction
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
roll = wrapping around, like a "cinnamon roll"
role = a part in something, i.e. a "role to play"
tisk tisk
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Broadband is a deregulated product. "
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In the past, offline media was one of the major mediums to promote one’s business and brand awareness. However, with the increasing popularity of the online media and its positive results, more people are turning to online marketing techniques to build a strong business presence across the globe. There are several online marketing strategies we can use for our Internet marketing solutions, but SEO (search engine optimization) today has taken a stance much ahead of any other technique.
SEO brings with it tremendous scope for business improvement with improved keyword positioning, improved ranking and overall increase in the ROI and cuts down on the PPC cost extensively in the long run. This is a proven marketing solution if done the right way using the right techniques based on your website requirements.
I thought this information would be helpful for those who wish to promote their website and get great results.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]