Lawyers Fined $72.6 Million For Screwing Up Patent Application, Not Letting Company Sue For Enough Cash
from the so-that's-what-it's-come-to dept
Rob Hyndman points us to the news that a law firm has been hit with a $72.6 million judgment for legal malpractice, after a company who had hired the law firm to handle its patent applications claimed that the law firm screwed up the applications, making it that much harder for the company to shake down other companies for cash. The inventors, in this case, claim to have come up with a "man down" alert system (for firefighters and the like), and had this law firm patent it for them. Of course, similar technology appeared on the market soon after, and so these guys sued and were "only" able to collect $9 million -- which they deemed to be way too little. So they sued the law firm... and won. So, apparently, these days you don't even need to have a good patent to make money. You can just blame your law firm for screwing up your patent if you weren't able to shake down enough other companies.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: malpractice, patents
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
What did the law firm do wrong?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What did the law firm do wrong?
The attorneys failed to disclose two prior patents in the initial and subsequent filings. That means that the companies being sued by Air Measurement Technologies, Inc. (the company that wanted the patent and sued the attorneys for malpractice) assert an "inequitable conduct" affirmative defense against AMT. Which means, that AMT were basically already guilty of inequitable conduct due to the conduct of the attorneys.
The main patent could have been filed back in 1990, but was not actually filed until 1997. That shortened the 17 years of protection AMT had over the patent.
And one hilarious act of malpractice was settling the one case for "only" 9 million dollars. AMT argued that by settling for such a low figure, it made it next to impossible to get higher settlements out of the other companies that were infringing the patent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So there is justice in this world!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So there is justice in this world!
You'd think, but in reality it means the rest of us get sued more, if only so they can cover their asses.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: So there is justice in this world!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: So there is justice in this world!
Mike, can we get a comment rating system next?
+5 Funny
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So there is justice in this world!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Can we get more of this?
Probably not, but I can always dream.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sharks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sharks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Inequitable conduct
2 things happen whenever IC is found. First, the alleged infringer amends their claims/counterclaims to add what's called a walker process antitrust claim -- basically that the patentee tried to commit fraud to monopolize the industry (these have basically always failed, even in the walker process case that created the doctrine). The second thing that happens is the patentee starts looking for other attorneys to handle the malpractice claim against whoever filed the patent.
I know a lot of the guys at Akin Gump, and they're great attorneys, but I don't personally know the guy who filed the patent -- it was back in the 80s (most of us here on TD were still in diapers or at most, riding the big yellow school bus).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I love that lawyers got their ass kicked and had to pay out the ass.. but.. the reason behind the lawsuit bothers me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Scent of stupidity in the morning
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Stacy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]