Less Than A Third Of Australia's Censor List Actually About Underage Images
from the moral-panic-for-censorship dept
For years and years and years, the Australian government has been looking to come up with a rationale for censoring the internet. The most recent plan has gone through some hiccups with mass protests. But, of course, the gov't has continued to push on, claiming that such a censored blacklist is important to stop child porn. Except... a few months back, the censored list was leaked, and a review of the list now shows that less than 32% of the sites were actually about child porn (via Michael Scott).This is one of the (many) reasons why such secret blacklists are always a bad idea. Given the opportunity to censor content, it's too tempting not to expand the list with general stuff the censors "don't like" rather than the actual intended purpose of the list. And that, of course, is why gov'ts always insist that such lists should be secret rather than publicly reviewable. Of course, it's worth noting that as part of the admission that the list has such a small percentage of what was supposed to make up the entire list, the Australian government says that it's having the police look into the leak of the list. Why? The only thing the leak exposed was how the gov't was lying to the public. That shouldn't be illegal. That should be welcomed whistle-blowing of gov't abuse.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: abuse, australia, censorship, filters
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
WIKILEAKS EDITORIAL"
Shorter and more direct link:
http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2009/05/28/australian-government-admits-less-than-32-of-secret-censo rship-list-is-related-to-underage-images/
"This week saw Australia joining China and the United Arab Emirates as the only countries censoring WikiLeaks. We were not notified by ACMA."
Sounds mostly like Wikileaks has a personal ax to grind.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Sounds like you don't like people exposing government corruption.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
You wish.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mostly it's just selfishness on their part in trying to push their views onto the rest of our society.
It seems that the folks that get into the political arena all have the drive to be there and force their own personal agenda on the rest of us, while most open minded Australians couldn't give two shits about most anything and never bother to run for political positions.
There's just too many fanatics or money grubbing greedy bastards running all levels of our politics from local councils through state and federal government.
Sometimes I think it'd be great to stand up and do something about it, but then the urge passes and I fall back to a "She'll be right mate" state of mind.
At the end of the day we bitch and moan about it, but get over it either way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That said the sooner they get over the stupid idea the better - everyone knows it's gonna happen anyway, the trials are a joke so they won't show any ill effects on speeds. Finally, you'll find that there's also a "test" ban relating to abortion - which isn't illegal, nor child porn - yet it made it to the list too.
Of course if it gets up here, do people from 'similar countries' like Canada / UK / US think your pollies won't try it on since it already works somewhere else.. ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Did your mama really name you Yeebok?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Brisbane
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good Job
Ronald J. Riley,
Speaking only on my own behalf.
Affiliations:
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (810) 597-0194 / (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 8 pm EST.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Slip N Slide - Weeeeeeeeeee
Then there will be companies that will claim the ability to get sites of your selection added to the list.
And PACs that petition the gvmt to add their pet peeves to the list.
The fun will never end
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hooah!!!
There should be another level to republican/democratic governments. People should vote on every law being proposed.
Especially financial.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]