Less Than A Third Of Australia's Censor List Actually About Underage Images

from the moral-panic-for-censorship dept

For years and years and years, the Australian government has been looking to come up with a rationale for censoring the internet. The most recent plan has gone through some hiccups with mass protests. But, of course, the gov't has continued to push on, claiming that such a censored blacklist is important to stop child porn. Except... a few months back, the censored list was leaked, and a review of the list now shows that less than 32% of the sites were actually about child porn (via Michael Scott).

This is one of the (many) reasons why such secret blacklists are always a bad idea. Given the opportunity to censor content, it's too tempting not to expand the list with general stuff the censors "don't like" rather than the actual intended purpose of the list. And that, of course, is why gov'ts always insist that such lists should be secret rather than publicly reviewable. Of course, it's worth noting that as part of the admission that the list has such a small percentage of what was supposed to make up the entire list, the Australian government says that it's having the police look into the leak of the list. Why? The only thing the leak exposed was how the gov't was lying to the public. That shouldn't be illegal. That should be welcomed whistle-blowing of gov't abuse.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: abuse, australia, censorship, filters


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 29 May 2009 @ 4:34pm

    "From Wikileaks, May 26, 2009

    WIKILEAKS EDITORIAL"

    Shorter and more direct link:

    http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2009/05/28/australian-government-admits-less-than-32-of-secret-censo rship-list-is-related-to-underage-images/

    "This week saw Australia joining China and the United Arab Emirates as the only countries censoring WikiLeaks. We were not notified by ACMA."

    Sounds mostly like Wikileaks has a personal ax to grind.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 29 May 2009 @ 5:00pm

    Re:

    Sounds mostly like Wikileaks has a personal ax to grind.

    Sounds like you don't like people exposing government corruption.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    CleverName, 29 May 2009 @ 6:08pm

    It's amazing what happens when you turn on the lights.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Grokk, 29 May 2009 @ 6:36pm

    The problem with the Australian government is that most of the people who hold the power have very small minded views on what's best for everyone.
    Mostly it's just selfishness on their part in trying to push their views onto the rest of our society.

    It seems that the folks that get into the political arena all have the drive to be there and force their own personal agenda on the rest of us, while most open minded Australians couldn't give two shits about most anything and never bother to run for political positions.

    There's just too many fanatics or money grubbing greedy bastards running all levels of our politics from local councils through state and federal government.

    Sometimes I think it'd be great to stand up and do something about it, but then the urge passes and I fall back to a "She'll be right mate" state of mind.

    At the end of the day we bitch and moan about it, but get over it either way.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 29 May 2009 @ 8:34pm

    Re:

    Yeah, you find a bunch of bloggers in a sort of opinion circle making each other feel good. Not very much news, just a lot of opinion and grinding of axes.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. icon
    Yeebok (profile), 29 May 2009 @ 9:40pm

    If you're gonna have a dig, anon, at least enter a name. It's pretty ordinary without one.
    That said the sooner they get over the stupid idea the better - everyone knows it's gonna happen anyway, the trials are a joke so they won't show any ill effects on speeds. Finally, you'll find that there's also a "test" ban relating to abortion - which isn't illegal, nor child porn - yet it made it to the list too.
    Of course if it gets up here, do people from 'similar countries' like Canada / UK / US think your pollies won't try it on since it already works somewhere else.. ?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. icon
    Anthony (profile), 30 May 2009 @ 12:01am

    Brisbane

    The biggest reason the current Government is attempting to bring this in is because they have a minority senate. The ALP need the support of the 6 Greens, 1 independent, and 1 Family First (read Christian nutcase) to get anything passed. The conservatives have more members in the senate than the ALP, and if just 1 of the non-major parties vote with them then the legislation is defeated. The ALP want to suck up to Mr Family First Christian nutjob to encourage him to vote with the ALP on other matters. In the late 90s the Conservatives needed another Christian nutcase(independent this time) to get things through the senate and they were sucking up to him. But the conservatives and Greens both oppose the filter, so there's no chance of it going ahead.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 30 May 2009 @ 12:55am

    Re: Re:

    Not very much news, just a lot of opinion and grinding of axes.

    You wish.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 30 May 2009 @ 1:00am

    Re:

    If you're gonna have a dig, anon, at least enter a name.

    Did your mama really name you Yeebok?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. icon
    Ronald J Riley (profile), 30 May 2009 @ 5:16am

    Good Job

    I could not agree more. The disinfecting light of public exposure is the best way to reign in knuckle-heads.

    Ronald J. Riley,


    Speaking only on my own behalf.
    Affiliations:
    President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
    Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
    Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org
    President - Alliance for American Innovation
    Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
    Washington, DC
    Direct (810) 597-0194 / (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 8 pm EST.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  11. identicon
    CleverName, 30 May 2009 @ 7:23am

    Slip N Slide - Weeeeeeeeeee

    It wont be long till anti-scientology sites are added to the list.

    Then there will be companies that will claim the ability to get sites of your selection added to the list.

    And PACs that petition the gvmt to add their pet peeves to the list.

    The fun will never end

    link to this | view in thread ]

  12. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 30 May 2009 @ 2:51pm

    Speaking only on my own behalf.
    Enlighten us Ronald J Riley, is there a time, when you do not speak on your own behalf? And this long self pushing signature is kinda annoying. If anyone is interested actualy, can see it in your profile...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  13. icon
    Hephaestus (profile), 31 May 2009 @ 1:12pm

    Hooah!!!

    The problem with government is there are to many secrets.

    There should be another level to republican/democratic governments. People should vote on every law being proposed.

    Especially financial.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  14. identicon
    Talmyr, 1 Jun 2009 @ 6:13am

    Re:

    Whilst I do find RJR's long sigs rather annoying, maybe this once we should cut him some slack as he actually AGREED with Mike? And without any bitchy comments! I'm still in shock...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  15. icon
    Yeebok (profile), 6 Jun 2009 @ 10:02pm

    Re: Re:

    It's as likely as your mum naming you 'anonymous'. get over it.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.