Will Journalists Bail On Newspapers That Put Up A Paywall?
from the they-might... dept
It's no secret that we think newspaper paywalls are an incredibly bad strategic move for most newspapers for a variety of reasons -- but now perhaps we can add one more to the list. Romenesko quotes Nick Denton pointing out that many star journalists hate the idea of their content appearing behind a paywall, because it takes away much of their audience -- and they want that audience. It's an interesting point -- though, we've certainly seen plenty of journalists clamoring for a paywall, assuming (incorrectly) that it would somehow help the newspapers make more money. Perhaps the point is that the good journalists know a paywall is a bad idea -- meaning that putting one up is likely to drive those journalists to other newspapers, giving people even less of a reason to pay for the locked up content online.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: journalism, paywall
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Good!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They can go off and run a blog and see how few people care.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Is that so crazy? Maybe you haven't noticed, but plenty of journalists HAVE built massive careers based on their personal "brand".
Unfortunately they also tend to lose their integrity and forget the skills that made them popular as they gain fame/notoriety, but that's another story...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Compare your local news site
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm willing to pay for good writing and research.
Unfortunately, "free" also means "cheap." If one actually likes advertising supported puff-pieces on celebrities, endless "gee whiz" stories on funny cats, or constant, pointless re-hashing of the latest story of the hour—great. I don't.
I, for one, am getting sick of hunting around for decent , well researched writing. Google newsfeeds links to crap more often than not. I don't know who to trust anymore and would be more than willing to subscribe to a paper that I would get every day online.
Only a few papers are marketing this and they are considered odd. Why?
I wish more papers would start offering it. They are all just drying up—trying to stay advertising supported. It's not going to work.
- AK[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I'm willing to pay for good writing and research.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yes understanding the import of the audience
Do get me wrong, I firmly believe in the hamster mentality: get everything, give nothing.
And for those who still don't get it, here's the dramatized theatrical version: Mine? Mine, mine, mine! Mineminemine ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Howard Stern
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
pay for news? only if it's marked fiction.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]