DJs Buy Their Own Music Online With Stolen Credit Cards To Grab Royalties
from the scheming dept
A group of people in the UK have been arrested after they allegedly put their own music on the iTunes Music Store and Amazon, then purchased it with stolen credit-card numbers. Police say they made 19 tracks and put them up in the shops, then spent about $750,000 on the music, grabbing about $330,000 in royalties from the purchases. It's quite the scam, since one difficulty in stealing credit-card numbers is converting them into cash. One way to do this is to sell the numbers themselves; another common way for people to do this is to take a stolen card, then go buy gift cards from a store with it, then sell the cards on the street at a discount. But selling Wal-Mart gift cards and hawking them on the street seems like an awful lot of work, compared to what a criminal with a computer and some music software can do. Of course, it's not too smart to continually buy the same tracks over and over with 1,500 stolen cards...Filed Under: music, royalties, scams, stolen credit cards
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Buy a few gift cards from different stores, buy some of your own music a few times + random music to cover your tracks, then sell the credit card number to someone else.
The problem with criminals is they're too greedy. If they had only spent say $200,000 on their own music and an equal or greater amount on 'noise music' for ~$100k profit they might have gotten away with it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gold Record?
They would stand out on those lists like a sore thumb.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Gold Record?
That just leads to more sales for the DJ Cabal. You're assuming too much after the fact because this scam has been uncovered.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]