Apple Warns Palm Pre Users: We're Going To Break Your iTunes Syncing
from the shot-across-the-bow dept
I have to admit that I've never really understood Apple's ongoing efforts to block any sort of compatibility with both iPod devices and iTunes. You may recall a few years back the big fight between Apple and RealNetworks when Real tried to let its software connect to iPods, which Apple treated as a gross injustice. Now Palm is doing the opposite, by letting the Pre connect and sync with iTunes software by making the device pretend it's an iPod when connected to a computer. Apple, however, has responded with a neat little message that never actually mentions Palm, even if it's entirely transparent who it's about, warning people that Apple can easily break syncing when it updates its software. Of course, Apple did it in a way that it can claim wasn't meant nefariously at all. All the company really meant was to make people understand that it has no control over how the Pre syncs with iTunes, and it's possible that an update could break that syncing. Sure. Right. Except most people assume this means Apple intends to break it.But I don't understand why. For people who bought the Palm Pre, that's only going to piss them off and drive them to use other software, taking them away from Apple's products. Why does that help Apple? Having Palm Pre syncing with iTunes increases the value of iTunes. What's wrong with that, other than being the latest example of Apple's dislike of anyone doing anything not invented in Cupertino?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Music sells ithings. Ithings push users to itoonz. I toonz sells players, loop. Why do you think that apple have become the masters of one upping themselves just in time to sell another wave of phones / players / whatever? The Iphone3gs is an amazing step for Apple, adds little that shouldn't have already been there, and creates a new snob level (oh, you have an OLD iphone).
Getting involved in millions of music sales a year is nice. Selling each of those users a new ithing every couple of years is golden - in part because it creates millions more music sales, which helps to sell the NEXT ithing, wash, rinse, repeat.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Er, actually Apple is doing the opposite. They're giving away the blades and selling the razors. That's why they care about the Pre et al.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
There's that, and then there's the "luddites" like me who have never wanted, needed, or found amy thing lacking with our lives becuase iTunes or the iPod or the iPhone weren't a part of it. I have tons of music that I can play on my mp3 player and can play it on any device I want, including my cell phone, and I just refuse to participate in Apple's crap. There's always another option.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Apple lawsuit
Isn't apple involved in an anti-trust lawsuit in Europe about its failure to allow other devices to connect to iTunes?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why piss everyone off?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Because...
Now, if I was Palm, I'd play catch-up with the iTunes sync thing, as needed, but I'd also get get someone else (with links to the Amazon mp3 store) that I could call on as well.
The thing about iTunes is that it's nicely integrated. There's nothing there that's hard to do, you just have to want to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Because...
Yes, I agree at a *first pass* and in fact have discussed how iTunes is effectively a "loss leader" for iPods and iPhones.
But... that still doesn't account for why this makes sense. Because they should be focused on selling by adding positive value, not negative value. Are people really not going to buy a Palm Pre because Apple breaks iTunes for it? Or, the more likely scenario, are they going to get pissed off at Apple and be less likely to buy ANYTHING from them in the future?
I'd argue the second scenario is a lot more likely.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Because...
Besides, they don't need to break Pre. They just need enough uncertainty about whether they will to prevent people from switching *from* Apple hardware to Pre. New users are a wash, they just don't want Palm to be seen as a legitimate upgrade option by people who have invested in Apple hardware and software. The threat is enough to meet that goal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Because...
I also believe "bundling" an unprofitable service with a profitable one and preventing anyone else from connecting a product they can offer that uses the unprofitable service is monopolistic and probably illegal -for example, BM was not able to prevent Amdahl from using the IBM OS on Amdahl hardware. Apple wants it both ways - they want to have products where they fix the price; and they don't want anyone taking any of their business (how else do you figure they'd have the nerve to parent a magnetic power plug so third party power adapter companies cannot offer a Mac power supply? Apple, of course, is "popular" so no one at DOJ will be looking.. yet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And that's why...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Typical of Apple fans to assume that hating Apple == love for Microsoft. The point is that to use Apple, you have to use everything Apple. If you don't use Apple, you can use EVERYTHING else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Actually,
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Actually,
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ugg
That's why I went from Amiga to PC compatible and Linux.
Never Bought Apple since Steve W. left the company.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Actually,
No, quite contrarily, since the Pre is so close in competition with the iPhone, that little ability of Palm's might drive otherwise iPhone owners to go get their hands on the well-hyped little guy.
So, to recap, iTunes compatibility for the Pre:
enormous value-adding feature for the Pre, which probably will convince at least a few people that they don't need an iPhone per se; and that exact same effect for Apple.
The extra one millionth of a percent of market share they probably won't even receive from iTunes interacting with the Pre would be offset a thousand times by any amount of once on-the-fence iPhone/Pre potential buyers going with the latter because, "Hey, I don't need an iPhone to have an iPod in my phone" is a pretty damn solid game-changer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Actually,
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Actually,
Almost everyone uses iTunes in some form, or at least has it on their computer.
LOL, uh no, you killed any argument you may have had with that right there. Everyone on the PC side that can't stand crapple will NOT have iTunes on their PC. I'm sorry to break it to you, but that's the VAST majority of the market.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
iPhone 3g unsubsized cost $499 - bill of materials ~
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
iPhone 3g unsubsized cost $499 - bill of materials ~
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
iPhone 3g unsubsized cost $499 - bill of materials ~$200-$250
8Gb flash ram upgrade for 3G - $99 - cost of 8Gb flash ram $10-12.
ipod nano 16gb - $199, $24 of flash ram + screen + player
itunes $.99-$1.29 - 66% to publishers, apple's take - $.33 - $.40 per song minus costs to run the store.
let's say they keep 25 cents a track profit and be overly generous. They'd have to sell an awful lot of music to make up the few hundred bucks they make for every iPhone. And since people can't buy music on the Pre itself, they'll lose revenue there too.
What most people don't understand is that the product is the iTunes/iPodPhone/dockEcosystem system.
The key to iPhone/iPod dominance is iTunes as protected gateway to media on the computer (purchased and ripped) in and the proprietary dock connector as the gateway to locked up devices on the way out.
The day that a company cracks either of those for good is the day apple becomes vulnerable and they're never going to let that happen.
Until retailers alone or banded together create a free music management / store software as good as iTunes, they are going to pound sand in the digital music market. And it's a double lock. Even if they do, that software won't work with iPhones and iPods so they'll never get traction. This has been true for the last 4-5 years and will remain true and will only get harder for retailers every year, but they won't or can't do it.
Sure, amazon will get a few sales, but best buy,target, and walmart will be losers. And 3 years from now when and if any other phones get traction and iPhone is comfortably ensconced, they can always open the store. Meanwhile, they will still garner the sales from the other phones when folks use software like doubleTwist 'sync' their phones.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
iPhone 3g unsubsized cost $499 - bill of materials $200-$250
8Gb flash ram upgrade for 3G - $99 - cost of 8Gb flash ram $10-12.
ipod nano 16gb - $199, $24 of flash ram + screen + player
itunes $.99-$1.29 - 66% to publishers, apple's take - $.33 - $.40 per song
minus costs to run the store.
let's say they keep 25 cents a track profit and be overly generous. They'd have to sell an awful lot of music to make up the few hundred bucks they make for every iPhone. And since people can't buy music on the Pre itself, they'll lose revenue there too.
What most people don't understand is that the product is the iTunes/iPodPhone/dockEcosystem system.
The key to iPhone/iPod dominance is iTunes as protected gateway to media on the computer (purchased and ripped) in and the proprietary dock connector as the gateway to locked up devices on the way out.
The day that a company cracks either of those for good is the day apple becomes vulnerable and they're never going to let that happen.
Until retailers alone or banded together create a free music management / store software as good as iTunes, they are going to pound sand in the digital music market. And it's a double lock. Even if they do, that software won't work with iPhones and iPods so they'll never get traction. This has been true for the last 4-5 years and will remain true and will only get harder for retailers every year, but they won't or can't do it.
Sure, amazon will get a few sales, but best buy,target, and walmart will be losers. And 3 years from now when and if any other phones get traction and iPhone is comfortably ensconced, they can always open the store. Meanwhile, they will still garner the sales from the other phones when folks use software like doubleTwist 'sync' their phones.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Now I just use Foobar2000 and the foo_dop ipod client plugin. The whole things is a breeze to use. Easy and obvious click and drag functionality that doesn't automatically do anything unless you explicitly tell it to. It has right click menus with obvious commands like 'send to ipod', 'remove from ipod' and so on, in addition to the normal toolbar commands. If you get the vst_wrapper plugin, it even lets you use vst plugins, so your equalizer can be a world class parametric if you want it be.
Yet another example of the glory of free at work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
iPhone 3g unsubsized cost $499 - bill of materials $200-$250 sale price to at&t maybe $260, real profit maker there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They understand $$ but
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm a Palm...
Hell, you can tell how much better I am by how much LIKE an iPhone I am. And now, I will PROVE how much better I am by syncing to iTunes!
Yeah, Apple are a bunch of losers, and us over here at Palm?
We rock, man. We innovate. We give the customer what the customer REALLY wants...
...Something like an Apple, but not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I'm a Palm...
oh yeah and i have no apps either. You can call me brick for short.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hardware Company is right
Apple is a hardware company.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anti Trust and the Dems are back
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
oh, and i have no idea why palm would want their device to work with itunes, itunes sucks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
unsubsidized pricing (no contract) is the price+$300-$400 FROM AT&T.
Estimated margin on the 3G was 55%+
http://www.crm-daily.com/story.xhtml?story_id=60462
We'll see about the 3gs in the next few days after someone does a teardown, but you'd expect them to have further cost-reduced the device. That is one profitable product.
$99 for a memory bump is at even higher margins
and don't forget $99 for MobileMe, recurs yearly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Apple can do what it wants...
If a Pre owner was sold a Pre after having been told by some sales person that the Pre supports syncing with iTunes, then that owner should be complaining to the store, or to Palm, or to management of who ever told him that he could do that.
My point, again, is that Apple has no obligation to support iTunes for anything but its own devices, and if that happens to break some other hardware syncing, it isn't Apple's fault, nor their problem.
If that sounds harsh, so be it, but I refuse to feel sorry for anyone that bought something like the Pre based upon a "feature" that is either a lie to the customer or an undocumented feature that shouldn't be counted upon to work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Apple can do what it wants...
When you are the market leader and a monopoly it is a problem or more importantly THEIR (Apple's) PROBLEM.
Think of it this way, what if Microsoft released a new version of Internet Explorer that broke Firefox. Would that be okay? Firefox worked great until you loaded IE8, after that it no longer would work as Microsoft found a way to disable it. How long do you think it would take for the anti-competitive lawsuits to follow.
I'm not saying I agree that Apple or Microsoft shouldn't be able to break stuff, just that once you become the market leader, you'll get sued for doing so.
By the way, for them to break the Pre would mean that they would have to reverse engineer the Pre, find a hole that wouldn't break their iThings and yet would break the Pre. In that scenario, they will get sued and probably lose as their actions would be far from innocent.
I love the fact that Apple has to react. I love that there is a new competitor in town. Can't wait for the Android phones to spread to Sprint and Verizon later this year/next and for Windows Mobile 7 phones to come out in Q1 of next year.
As Apple has demonstrated in the past, they will continue to try and over-price and over-control the market, which despite having cooler and fancier products on the market first ultimately will lead to their failure.
Apple maybe a hardware company, but as Microsoft has learned the real money is in being an "open" foundation company. If Apple wants to truly succeed in the long run, they have to make the iUniverse and an open one. I'm not holding my breathe.
Freedom
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Apple can do what it wants...
IE and FF are both software, obstensively built to do exactly the same thing: display web pages. Now, if Microsoft insisted that you use IE to visit their own web pages, and did something to break or slow down FF when someone used it to access their home pages, that would be similar.
Oh yeah, but wait, they do. (Or did. Maybe that got changed.)
iTunes is proprietary and was built specifically to support Apple made devices. They built the hardware, they wrote the software, they get to decide what hardware the software interacts with.
Maybe in two years, Apple will have something to worry about, but with over 40 million iPhones sold worldwide I don't think they have to worry right now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
For the Zillionth time....
When the iPod first came out, Apple created the ITMS to offer a value-add to the iPod. They also were roundly dismissed as being crazy to do so. Fast-forward to present day: The ITMS is a *major* player in online music sales and now all the naysayers want a piece of the action.
If you want to use iTunes to automagically manage music on your portable device, buy it from Apple. If not, please feel free to check out the scores of other solutions out there (check with your nearest Lunix user for suggestions).
Sheesh.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Play nice now Stevey...
To me it represents everything that is wrong with Apple, whenever I start up my PC it just HAS to run in the background along with all the other Apple 'services'. Getting music from other sources to work on my wifes iPlayer (free from a supplier) is a pain in the ass and taking that music to play on other devices is worse.
I actually quite like Apples design work and the look, feel and simplicity of a lot of their products (as long as you are doing ONLY what Apple want), but the extra layers of complications they add in if you want to deviate even slightly from an iEverything universe keeps me away.
It's like the spoilt rich kid in the playground, sure he's got a better ball and his toys are fantastic, but the extra overhead of always having to play his games his way and only ever speaking to an approved list of friends, (never ever talk to Mr smellyhead hairypalm kid) just makes it not worth the hassle. I'd much rather play with the other kid whoose ball perhaps isn't quite as new, but who treats me like a human, doesn't get in a strop if I want to play a different game somewhere else, and who plays nice with most of the other boys and girls...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
MACS = Company controlled vrs PC/MS User controlled
PC are open. Microsoft is the dominate OS and must be very robust and dynamic to correctly hand all possible combination of stupidity. I am amazed it works so well. User controlled!
BTW: I like PC and MS in general because the vast array of things that I can do with it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lack of iTunes support means less people buying Pre's, not more people using the Pre's software. Pre isnt driving the smartphone/music store bus, Apple is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Apple breaking Pre syncs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
MSC (UMC) = You have a brain
Why anyone would use MTP(media transfer protocol) other then being obtuse or lazy, eludes me and I don't think it qualifies as a protocol. Then again I'm weird like that, for example rather then "desktop search" I use subdirectories :P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
cool phone.
I'm pretty sure if people are vocal enough about such an easy change then Palm will respond fairly quickly.
http://www.palmpreforum.org is all about the Palm Pre
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Very Reason I don't by Apple
Windows 7
Blackberry
Palm
PC's
[ link to this | view in chronology ]