What Happens To All That Personal Data Clear Holds? It's Unclear
from the that's-a-problem dept
I have to admit, there was one part of the "Clear" airport "fast pass" program created by Stephen Brill that I never fully understood. In order to join Clear, you had to submit all sorts of personal info -- which raised a lot of questions when the company behind Clear, Verified Identity Pass, lost a laptop with all that data last year. But what's never been clear to me is why this data was needed. If you had a Clear card, it wasn't like you went through any less of a security check. You just got to cut the line. That's it. You still ended up needing to go through the same security check. So why did Verified Identity Pass -- or the Department of Homeland Security who VIP passed the data on to -- need your personal info in the first place?Either way, that's now raising a lot more questions because no one seems entirely sure what happens to all that data now that the company has gone out of business. While the company insists that airport kiosks and employee computers are being wiped clean, there are still plenty of questions about just who still has access to the data, and what happens to it if someone else buy's up VIP's assets or if the company declares bankruptcy and creditors get access to their assets.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: clear, personal info, stephen brill
Companies: verified identify pass
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Why the data...because they were still trying?
Obviously (to anyone who's read Bruce Schneier for any length of time) that would be a stupid idea, and the TSA never went along with it.
I'll be fascinated to see what happens to those information assets.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Everything else will be sold off in bulk lots. From buying computers at bulk lots before, any data-stripping is haphazard at best (like pulling out all the hard drives.. only to sell them, otherwise untouched, as a separate auction lot)
We may indeed here more (bad) news from this shell of a company before things are over, if any connected party actually cares enough to step up for responsibility after their big shutdown firesale.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://blogs.wsj.com/middleseat/2009/06/23/clear-update-what-happens-to-your-personal-dat a/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Err, Lockheed Martin may have a copy of the data, but obviously not the only copy as evidenced by VIP loosing a laptop with it. It's all those other copies that are the immediate concern (despite Brill's attempt at misdirection).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Delete
It amazes me that many companies are constantly scream infringement when it comes to their "private" data being used by someone else. However, they don't seem to have a problem with claiming that a customers private data is in fact theirs!
In an era where identify theft is hyped as a major issue, the logical conclusion is that all customer data must be deleted. First, it should not be considered a company asset. Second, if the data is not deleted; the possibility exists that an unethical company can buy the private data and then re-sell it, and then re-sell it again. So if we want to preclude the misuse of private data, when a company goes out of business they should not be considered as having an interest in that data any longer and it should be deleted.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ulterior Motive?
+ + +
Lendon Forrester, clattering bags of jumbled canned goods, ran up the steps and opened the door. “Did I miss it?”
“No,” Frannie Jurdens called from the kitchen. “They’re still in a holding pattern.” She capped the jug she’d been filling, and placed it beside the others on the counter.
Len glanced at the reporter on the living room TV in passing. “…the ticket counter behind me, air travel in our city has ground to a halt. This same ‘ghost-town’ scenario is being played out at airports across the country, in the wake of this morning’s thwarted terrorist attack in Cincinnati.”
Frannie looked up as he entered. “I don’t know, Len. The media’s crawling with rumors.”
+ + +
You can read the whole thing (and lots of other stories) here:
http://klurgsheld.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/short-story-incident-on-concourse-b/
P. Orin Zack
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]