By Limiting What Athletes And Journalists Can Do, Sports Leagues Are Stifling Their Own Growth
from the shot-in-the-foot dept
In a world where the traditional lines of "journalism" are becoming increasingly blurred, Justin Rice, over at the Nieman Journalism Lab, discusses how the "media tables are turning in the world of sports, where the subjects of coverage are becoming the creators of coverage." With tools like blogs and twitter, professional athletes are now, more than ever before, able to communicate directly with their legions of fans. The ability to self-publish has strangely drawn the ire of sporting organizations. For example, during the Olympics, the IOC placed burdensome restrictions on the blogging activities of the athletes, rendering many of the athletes mute out of frustration. We've seen in the past that both the MLB and the NFL have tried to copyright facts, something that thankfully, the courts have struck down. Furthermore, the MLB and NFL have limited the length of clips that news outlets can use in their reports.While Rice correctly points out that these issues are not simply First Amendment issues, since they also involve "contract law, intellectual property law and copyright law." The bigger issue here is that while there certainly is plenty of legal work here to line plenty of lawyers' pockets, what these sporting organizations need to realize is that they are shooting themselves in the foot. Promoting the free distribution of the facts, videos, and stories surrounding their sporting events will only serve to promote those sporting events more. These restrictions merely serve to hamstring any sort of development that may actually deepen fans' relationship with the sporting franchise. It seems completely counterintuitive that if an athlete were willing and able to spend hours of time creating valuable content at no additional cost to anyone, that it would be quashed. If anything, athletes and journalists should be encouraged to share more video, stories and tweets with their fans.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: athletes, journalism
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I think Rice is soft of fishing for a story that isn't really there. Baseball, Football, and NASCAR (three biggest US sports) get so much coverage already it is almost sickening.
They might be stifling their own growth if there was a significant number of people who were not aware of their products, but that just ain't the case.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "Sports Leagues Are Stifling Their Own Growth"
and are (almost) completely non-existent to anybody in the rest of the world.
Tennis, Soccer (well Football to the rest of the world) and Formula 1 are the international sports (even Cricket has a bigger world following than the US sports) - eventually those local US sports will have to compete against the games that the rest of the world plays - or die - so they can't afford to shoot themselves in the foot!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Alternatives
That kind of logic has doomed many companies. The line of thinking is that they are on top, and they will stay on top by some type of divine right. This line of thinking leads to a belief that they do not have to innovate or change. Management attention shifts to enhancing existing revenue streams, usually by tightening control of what is going on.
You get an organization that has a boring but profitable product. Inevitably it will get knocked off its pedestal by something more interesting or more efficient. The old order will whine and cry. It will probably get all kinds of pundits decrying its downfall and calling for protectionist legislation. We have seen it before, and we will probably see it again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's not about stifling growth
Just wait....it will only be a matter of time before guys start getting fined for what the tweet or blog. Is that stifling growth, or keeping sports what they're supposed to be about in the first place.....competition.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It's not about stifling growth
I can't see the benefit for the sports, only for the individuals.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It's not about stifling growth
But, to have a blanket policy against blogging or tweeting is short sighted -- if players individually undermine the team, they should be dealt with individually..
That said, players have already felt the sting of oversharing, as in the case of Giants' closer Brian Wilson, who stopped twittering after he got berated for blowing a save after tweeting from a late night clubbing session the night before... Still, I liked seeing Wilson's tweets, and it's a loss not to have them anymore.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"If you build it, they will come." WordPress is free. Create an "official" blog for Olympic athletes. Then you'll not only give the fans (and athletes) what they want AND be able to monetize the content with ads, but also you'll have editorial control.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It must be catching
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Managing direct sharing by sports personalities
Whether justified or not, high profile players are generally seen as ambassadors for their sports, so the sports organisations are justifiably concerned that things the players say may be seen as reflecting badly on the organisations.
Really, at least one aspect of this parallels the corporate codes of conduct that basically amount to "don't share private work matters with the world at large, whether that be via blog, Facebook, tweets or whatever". Some companies are quite open and hence happy for employees to share a lot of details about their work (e.g. Canonical, the company behind Ubuntu). Others are very closed and will fire people that leak the tiniest skerrick of information (e.g. Apple).
For sports, they need to identify things that players *shouldn't* be talking about (e.g. disciplinary matters, team tactics, relationships with sponsors or potential sponsors) and otherwise let the players have free reign over their relationship with their fans.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]