Exploring The Connected Nation Boondoggle
from the sneaky,-sneaky dept
Last year, we discussed whether or not Connected Nation broadband mapping group, was really just a big telco boondoggle designed to get gov't money and allow telcos to avoid really providing broadband data. For some reason, politicians are absolutely in love with Connected Nation, though. When I was in Washington DC recently, they talked about it like it was the solution to our country's broadband needs. That seems quite bizarre no matter how you look at it. First, it's just a "mapping" organization and it's run by the telcos themselves, allowing them to continue to fudge the data to make markets look a lot more competitive than they really are. And, yet, thanks to all the political love that goes out to Connected Nation, it looks like they're about to get hundreds of millions of dollars in broadband stimulus money.Broadband Reports points us to Art Brodsky's "final warning" about Connected Nation, before we hand over tons of tax money to it, and it's not pretty. He notes the ridiculousness of politicians complaining that the gov't agency in charge of getting accurate maps has failed (solely because the telcos refuse to give them the data) and deciding the best "response" to this is to simply hand the whole project (and lots of money) over to the telcos who refused to give the data up in the first place:
The fruit is not the product of the state agency, however. Faison used his announcement to criticize e-NC: "Until now, we have not had a map showing street address availability of broadband. e-NC has generated maps based on information disclosed by the providers which are based on the average number of customers with broadband access in a wire center. Unfortunately, information provided in this fashion does not allow you to see where broadband is and where it is not, it does not allow you to see the holes in the Swiss cheese, and depending on the area the hole may be larger than the cheese."Brodsky goes on to show a Connected Nation map, and note how useless it is in actually giving granular data, and then compares it to another group's map, with much greater detail. I certainly agree that better data is important, but I have to admit I'm still somewhat confused as to what real problem we end up solving with mapping alone? Yes, it will give us more data to figure out just what the current situation is when it comes to broadband deployment, but that's got little to do with actually improving our broadband infrastructure.
Note the circular logic here. Faison and other members of his committee are criticizing e-NC for their maps, which were based on information supplied, or not, as it were, by the telecom industry. The state agency has been hampered by AT&T's unwillingness to supply broadband data and its insistence on a very restrictive non-disclosure agreement for information the company did supply.
Instead of pushing the industry to stop stonewalling e-NC, Faison and the others trashed e-NC's work and commended the work of – AT&T, the very company that hamstrung e-NC. Here is Faison’s praise for the industry: "In the face of legislation recommended by the Committee which would have required the providers to disclose precise information to the Legislature for our staff to generate a detailed map of availability, the providers have come together and collectively decided to provide the information through Connected Nation, to not only provide the "street address" map but also to make the map both accessible and interactive through the internet. Special recognition should be given to AT&T, Embarq, Sprint, Time Warner Cable, The Cable Association, the Telephone Co-op association, and Alltel for their work on this matter."
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: boondoggle, broadband, broadband policy
Companies: connected nation
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's really not about mapping alone. Mapping is the first step in a massive new effort. We're about to spend $7 billion on grants, and possibly billions more on a broader national strategy that will be unveiled next year.
Included in that initial $7 billion is $300 million for broadband mapping, most of which is set to go to this incumbent-crafted group.
On this group's board of directors sits an endless list of the biggest names in telecom lobbying, who've spent a decade pretending the sector is ultra-competitive and broadband penetration is just fine.
It's not a stretch to worry about the quality of data these gentlemen will be pumping out. With bad data, who knows how effective any stimulus would be?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If the first step guides the latter steps, and we're letting a biased group execute the first step, we may not end up at our planned destination.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My attempt to over simplify
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They can, and some (like BroadbandCensus.com) ARE trying to fix this. But relying on user data isn't enough. You need data from carriers, who refuse to hand it over.
There's a slew of more accurate state-level mapping organizations who do a very good job using user data. The problem is Connected Nation was created, I believe in part, to ensure these operations never see the light of day.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
politicians
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In part. But when your board of directors is stocked with some of the biggest lobbying names in telecom, I'm sure it's not particularly hard to get politicians to support your endeavor, even if it was called "Donkey Molester." Particularly on the State level, where the group got its start as "Connect Kentucky," proudly proclaiming they miraculously managed to wire more than 98% of the state with broadband (which is total nonsense).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
broadband mapping
If the data supplied by a group with the telephone company and cable company interests at heart presents a misleading picture, then not only will the policy be flawed, but all of that public money will have been wasted.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The boondoggle continues
The last $200 billion the government handed out to
improve fiber connectivity resulted in untold miles
of dark fiber. Much of the money was spent upgrading
existing service to compete in high population density
areas, which of course is most profitable. In rural
areas fiber was laid but the CO's never upgraded. So
they can say the fiber is there and omit the fact that
it's still useless over a decade later.
The debate over should the government subsidize rural
areas misses the point. The money was spent with a
specific objective. It was no misunderstanding. The
telcoms took the money then didn't deliver the goods.
I expect more of the same.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Monopoly through Obscurity
I'm half tempted to dig up the data and send it in myself... but NDAs and big companies are nothing to trifle with
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nothing to see.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Flag Their Youtube Propaganda
[ link to this | view in chronology ]