European Publishers Latest To Call For Special Copyright Expansion Over News
from the if-this-is-your-business-model... dept
In the last few weeks, there's suddenly been a big push by folks in the newspaper business to start talking about how copyright law should be expanded to help protect their business. The latest to do this, apparently, is a group of European publishers, including some big names, asking for copyright law to be changed in some way to benefit newspapers. They didn't make specific proposals, but they're likely thinking about the various ideas that have been floating around about stopping aggregators or providing some sort of copyright or copyright-like protection on breaking news.This whole idea isn't just ridiculous, but it won't help newspapers. It would almost certainly harm them, however.
- First of all, if the only thing protecting your business from failure is government protectionism... you're not doing a very good job at building a real business. And, you won't be able to hold back real competitors from eating your lunch (or, at least, the parts of it they haven't eaten already).
- Next, stronger copyright won't bring more people to your site or get more people to give you money.
- Stronger copyright protection will only harm your online distribution efforts, in making it that much more difficult for others to send you traffic or to participate in the discussion.
- Relying on these things, and thinking that stronger copyright somehow is a business model will just mean that you've opened the playing field wide to those who actually embrace the collaborative, sharing nature of the internet.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, europe, journalism, reporting
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
but...
Isn't a country's government supposed to own and control EVERYTHING???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: but...
I hope.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: but...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I may be wrong ...
Further more, I thought that you could not copyright, patent, or trademark facts.
Ya ya ... the case about breaking news - blah blah - that was a bad decision and should not be used as precedence.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
not just europe
for research purposes, the same sort of approach has a little bit of traction deep within the bowels of the american newspaper industry:
http://www.fitzandjen.com/2009/07/nnn-backs-change-in-copyright.html
http://www.fitz andjen.com/2009/07/what-the-marburgers-are-really-saying-about-copyright-law-and-aggregators.html
http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/07/08/more-support-for-changing-copyright-law-to-help-newspapers/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
European Publishers and IPR
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google selected articles start with one 2004, a really
nice example of that pricing strategy. And at the same
time it is also the logical explanation why one paper
mentioned went bust. This strategy is not only the case for
the US. It is something the media never talk about.
http://denver.bizjournals.com/denver/stories/2004/11/08/story4.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]