But Who Will Cover City Council Meetings?
from the if-there's-demand dept
One of the points we've tried to make over and over again is that if there's a demand for reporting on something, models will get created to cover it. This doesn't mean that participatory journalism will flat-out replace the legacy media. Instead, we believe that the two will just blend together, with roles for the pros alongside everyone else. But, one of the key points made by folks who insist that newspapers are the last bastion between the world and widespread corruption is the question: "but who would cover city council meetings if newspapers don't send reporters?" The idea is that no one really cares enough to cover such things. Except, that's not necessarily true. As Jay Rosen notes, it appears that when concerned citizens are interested in what's happening in their local governments, they appear to do an amazingly thorough job covering city council meetings -- perhaps much more thoroughly than the bored reporter using the gig as a stepping stone to a more exciting beat.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: city council, journalism
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Rebooting the News
http://www.scripting.com/
http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/07/08/hyperlocalBloggersAtCalJsc. html
http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/07/13/rebootingTheNews16.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Citizen reporters in theory are good, but in reality they can be selective in what they report.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Yeah and professional reporters are not selective in what they report
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Plus, Mike, when you complain about the death of newspapers you say they should focus on local news since anyone can get national/world news easily and abundantly on the internet. A city council meeting would be the best place for a news reporter to be to report on what is going on in the community since you probably won't find that info on the NY Times website.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
so why can't the guy that used to cover the city hall beat for the smalltown star keep doing it on his or her blog?
and instead of just covering the beat, why not go further in depth as well?
if there are so many crazies that attend these meetings to advance their insane agendas, surely covering them should even provide a human interest/humor section to the blog to attract those disaffected types who use the internet to hate everything.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Maybe they would like to keep their paycheck from the local rag? Plus, to maintain their job they will probably try to be more objective when reporting to keep the newspaper management happy. Sure they are free to go off in their own time and have a blog. But trying to make it profitable may be a little challenging for some of the smaller communities.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
This isn't about keeping newspaper management happy (as if newspaper management isn't bias) it's about keeping citizens happy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
So you want to adopt a business model to force people to pay for something they may not want to pay for (ie: via government intervention) just to get some news? If he can provide something of value worth paying for people will pay. But lets not force people to pay him through government intervention and the censoring of blogs and such.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
No different than this blog. We know Mike's angle - or we soon discover it. If we don't agree with it, we find another perspective.
But look at the reports and news stories he points to where the reporter is parroting the RIAA. Is THAT factual? Where's the other side?
Everyone has an agenda. Some are just better at disguising it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
That's most often because the other side isn't an organized anything, but rather a blob of quasi-legal and mostly illegal actors who don't want to come to the front. They certainly don't send out talking points memos, and they certainly don't make themselves widely available to reports.
heck, look at the clusterf--k of a job that the guys from TPB did in their court case. They didn't make themselves available to the media in any way that the media could easily handle, so their message was lost.
Don't blame the reporters for using the information they have, they can't get blood from a stone, and they can't interview ghosts and goblins.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
First of all who are YOU to decide what constitutes a nutjob? Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't make them a nutjob. Allow the citizens to make that decision.
"to maintain their job they will probably try to be more objective when reporting to keep the newspaper management happy."
and who are they, or their bosses, to decide what constitutes "objective" reporting. Again, lets allow the citizens to decide this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
In my experience, bloggers and "professionals" usually have equivalent levels of bias.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Some maybe but some won't. And for every citizen that has a bias in one direction there is a citizen that has a bias in another direction and will report the news in that opposite direction just as well. As a result we get a larger perspective of views and we get to SEE all the different views and arguments instead of having a "professional" trying to be moderate censor those views in an attempt to be "moderate." and some citizens will be moderate so we can follow them as well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Selective?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If anyone is interested, http://twitter.com/TheRapidian/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Local beat reporters
Almost all of the reporters were inexperienced and did not even notice glaring inconsistencies in press releases (which were their lifeblood). If they had a question they called the head of the department who would of course give them the official storyline.
After meetings that were covered by the local newspapers it was always entertaining to read the articles about the meeting. The points that they covered were usually the sensational rather than what was really important.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
WOW
Thanks so much for the recognition. I really appreciate it!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sunshine Laws.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Journalists involved
My question is simple. Can a reporter covering the city council also sit on the council.
In our town of 5k, one the council members was killed in traffic accident.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]