No Truth In Advertising When It Comes To ISP Traffic Shaping In Canada
from the that-seems-like-a-problem... dept
Via Rob Hyndman, we learn that in the Canadian gov't hearings investigating broadband provider traffic shaping, the providers revealed a lot about their traffic shaping practices that seem to contradict what those same providers claim on their websites well selling connectivity. Even if traffic shaping is to be considered legal, shouldn't broadband providers be required to be honest about what they're offering customers?Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: broadband, canada, isps, traffic shaping, truth in advertising
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Canada National ISP
__________________________________
*will
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Canada National ISP
That was seriously awesome.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dishonesty regarding traffic shaping?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ahhhh.... the lands of choices...
Sad. Corporatism really did kill Capitalism.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"Sad. Corporatism really did kill Capitalism."
A fascist Amerikan government STILL focused on fighting communism and a unified European continent....Hitler would have been so proud of us.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
We have over 200 ISP's available nationally wherever you live... (Australia)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Up To
So what are they not being honest about? Their advertising says "up to" some number. Remember, "up to" includes zero. Don't confuse marketing with lying.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fiber is the solution
I know that I would happily pay $857 or more to have an unlimited pipe coming into my home, and I would pay for the privilege of using as much real bandwidth as I wanted! Some months I might only use a few gigs, other months I would use hundreds. Just like electricity, water, and gas I would pay for what I use from an unlimited supply.
I'm curious how many others would pay to free their homes from the clutches of Bell and Rogers. Resident-owned fiber to the home is the solution. Imagine real competition for your telephone, Internet and TV service!
On another note, when I cancelled my Rogers Internet service last year, they asked why I was canceling and I told them it was completely because of the throttling. They pretended not to know what I was talking about, and their computers didn't have a 'check box' for that, so I made them put a note on my account explaining in detail how displeased I was. Unfortunately I went to Bell, who started throttling soon after I joined, after promising me that they had no plans to ever do so and would never do such a thing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Fiber is the solution
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Fiber is the solution
The only problem we have is internet caps due to our location, but that should be fixed once more money is put towards larger bandwidth fiber across the pacific to the US.
You guys in the US shouldn't complain about shaping etc. our government is trying to implement filtering! WTF! 90% of people are against it but somehow it's going forward...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
setbacks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They are trying to equate ALL download bandwidth with P2P bandwidth. While Bell might offer 10Mbps downloads, and shape P2P to 512k, they are NOT turning off the rest of your download space - just not allowing P2P to happen beyond a certain limit. So you could still watch a video off of YouTube or whatever and your P2P speed would not change. It isn't like they throttle EVERYTHING down to 512, which is what they are trying to imply.
The assumption by the NowToronto article is that users do nothing except P2P, which is just bogus. It is entirely a misrepresentation of the truth. Mike, you should be ashamed to link to this sort of misinformation, don't you read what you link to?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]