Times Must Be Tough: Harvard Becoming A Trademark Troll
from the ask-not-what-you-can-do-for-hah-vahd dept
Vanity Fair recently had a long, but absolutely fascinating article on how Harvard gambled away a big part of its endowment. Even worse, folks at Harvard seemed to think that the annual increases to the endowment were a sure thing, and spent like they were always going to see massive returns. The university is now feeling a pretty massive pinch because of this, and trying all sorts of things to cut costs and bring in more revenue. Apparently, that includes trademark trolling. ChurchHatesTucker points us to the news that Harvard is looking to trademark a bunch of common or well-known phrases, including "Ask what you can do," (based on President Kennedy's famous speech) and "Lessons learned." Not surprisingly, this is raising some free speech questions, concerning the university's right to try to claim some form of "ownership" over these common phrases. The university claims it's just for defensive purposes:"Since we're spending so much time and money to promote this phrase, we just want to make sure someone doesn't say we can't use it."Of course, that basically highlights the ridiculousness of the way copyright, patents and trademarks are viewed these days: as something you need to "stockpile" so someone else doesn't get them. Some of the trademark applications are on phrases that Harvard isn't even using:
"You need to reserve something in case you intend to use it," Calixto said. "We're strategically protecting it for use at some point down the line."And I thought you could only get trademarks on actual use in commerce.
In the meantime, when I started reading the articles linked above, and thought that it would make for a good post, I totally planned to end it by pointing out that people should start getting around these trademarks by referring to the university as "Hah-vahd." Except... the university has an application pending for "The Hahvahd Tour." Oh well...
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Notice the IMPORTANT word, "looking". It's like me saying "I am looking to sleep with Angelina Jolie". It doesn't for a moment suggest I will succeed, now does it?
The story is a story when they actually get trademarks, and those trademarks are general enough to stop use by anyone (other than perhaps other universities)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
What's especially notable is that they have a not insignificant chance of succeeding if other cases tell us anything, and the fact that they are so motivated to get these trademarks out of fear of somebody else attaining them tells you all you need to know about IP's lamentable state.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Now, I show up at her door, ring the bell, and the security guard says "She isn't going to sleep with you, go away".
That's pretty much what Harvard is likely to get for most of these.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Indeed. C.f., the devolution of the concept of 'trademark dilution.'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's important because this is Harvard we're talking about, not, say, Monster Cable. Harvard's law school has lately been taking a pretty sane point of view on IP (or at least copyright) law. For the school to express an opinion that these trademarks are actually reasonable is moderately disturbing. (Imagine if you heard that Richard Stallman was "looking to release proprietary software" and you'll get the idea :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RE:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RE:
Unless of course, your that internet perv..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]