German Green Party Pushes File Sharing Legalization Tax
from the an-idea-no-one-likes dept
It seems like an idea almost no one likes. Many users are against the idea of needing to pay a tax for file sharing they don't do, and the recording industry hates any idea that "legalizes" file sharing. And yet, the Green Party in Germany seems to be pushing forward with an idea to legalize personal file sharing via a special tax users would pay via their ISP bill. Apparently the plan would involve paying different amounts based on the speed of your internet connection, which seems a bit bizarre. What does the speed necessarily have to do with how much file sharing you do? Oh yeah, the other problem? No one seems to have any idea how to distribute the proceeds of such a tax.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: file sharing, germany, green party, tax
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Easy peasy
Oh thats EASY, Mike, it will go:
-To the Govt, first
-Then to the RIAA/MPAA/PRS/etc collection agencies
and NONE to any "infringed" (or not) artists, because they arent the rights holders, so F-em (as the **IAA's see it).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Audio Home Recording Act
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Audio Home Recording Act
But, I do think there was a tax on cassette tapes way back in the day, but at lease with those the purchase was voluntary.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Audio Home Recording Act
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Audio Home Recording Act
Yep, and that's why I think BluRay is going to fail too- they're adding managed copy to the new BluRay spec, so you'll get the luxury of buying a new BluRay player next year.
http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/12/blu-ray-gets-managed-copy-next-year-requries-new-hardwar e/
I wish it wasn't so doom and gloom, but, history seems to repeat over and over, I guess.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As far as blueray goes. I would rather keep my files in digital format and view them over the network. With drive space becoming so cheap why should I invest in another format that is more restrictive? Not to mention there less plastic recycle.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Like, as was mentioned, how to distribute the money.
And who is to decide what quality or importance (or whatever) your work has to have to guarantee you to get your share - there can be a potential for abuse on the decider's side (there are fears it could lead back to times of despotic discrimination against what an elite caste then called "degenerate art"), and there is still no objective idea of how to seperate it from the restrictive music industry schemes we have now on one hand and from "bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen" (condition-free basic income)* one the other.
And if software qualifies for it. If not: Why? But if: what about software that doesn't add any cultural benefit, and who decides this how?
And how to distribute the money to people if they already foolishly granted all the exploitation rights for their works to companies. Etc etc.
AFAIK as of today only the Green Party wants a Kulturflatrate, with the Left Party and the Pirate Party seeing it as nothing more than a possible transitional system for whatever might come.
*) A model discussed by all parties except the two big tents, but still endorsed by none.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Funny thing .....
This would totally burn the recording industry .... Funny !!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]