Pointless Babble Is In The Eye Of The Beholder
from the yer-doing-it-wrong dept
A bunch of folks have been submitting some silly study claiming that 40% of Twitter messages are "pointless babble," confirming the standard critique from non-Twitter users of the uselessness of Twitter as a whole. Of course, there are all sorts of problems with this that have been raised by a bunch of people, starting with the methodology, but a bigger point is that the only really "pointless babble" is in trying to determine how much of Twitter is pointless babble. That's because Twitter doesn't work as a broadcast mechanism, whereby you have to pay attention to all of it. It's based on who you follow. If there's too much "pointless babble," there's a simple solution: follow other people. As Sean Garrett sarcastically notes, "62% of all phone conversations deemed "useless babble" say researchers."But the real issue is that "pointless babble" is very much in the eye of the beholder. What these researchers consider to be pointless babble (things like someone tweeting that they were going out to eat) can actually be quite useful and valuable. I still tell the story of how just such a "pointless babble" of a Tweet resulted in me getting a chance to meet someone I'd wanted to meet for a while, and I've had many other "pointless babble" tweets come in handy in doing business deals or meeting other people as well. What's "pointless babble" to some can be incredibly useful to others.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: conversations, pointless babble, twitter
Companies: twitter
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
And since when is human interaction pointless, regardless of it's entertainment value?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Twitter Cops
The reality of twitter can be summed up in this video:
Twitter Cops
Hey, just so you know, I'm eating a taco, and yes, there are Tacos in Germany. There. Glad I got that off my chest. Baaaah.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
40%?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 40%?
In the case of Twitter it can be 100% though!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pointless Babbling is the point
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pointless Babbling is the point
Hmm. So the telegraph didn't need replacing, because we had the telegraph? Horse & buggies didn't need replacing because we had horse & buggies?
Technology changes over time. I'm not saying that RSS needs to be replaced, but saying that because it's there it deserves to stay isn't exactly compelling.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Pointless Babbling is the point
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Pointless Babbling is the point
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Pointless Babbling is the point
If you find that twitter is full of inane and useless posts, then you are following the wrong people.
This is the true strength and direction of "social networking". Your network becomes your filters of the Internet. The problem with RSS is that your only getting information from the feed(s) you subscribe to, and you get all those feeds.
With a healthy social network, you end up getting information from places your subscribed feeds don't go. You get linked to information and events from areas you'd have had never checked out on your own.
I have found a variety of interesting music, news and other areas of interest specifically because of my social network feeds.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
WOW Even Twitter
I think this site is pushing closer to 85-90% pointless babble.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: WOW Even Twitter
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
From personal experience, anyone who says microblogging is pointless hasn't tried it. I was wary myself before jumping in, and guess what, I was dead wrong. Here are a few good things that happened to be because of microblogging:
- I made several good (real life) friends.
- I was a featured member on Identi.ca (one of the aforementioned friends selflessly recommended me).
- I had a couple of micro-posts in the popularity Top 5 on the same website.
- I have twice as many followers as followed people.
- Literally seconds after announcing the aforementioned blog post, a follower noticed it and promptly reposted the link.
Sounds good? Now consider the fact that I'm not a very active microblogger. Nor am I famous, or doing particularly cool stuff. Just an ordinary guy trying to do something with it, as opposed to (or rather alongside with) fooling around. That's all it takes, really.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The babble on twitter is quite useful! For criminals...
Or when I tweet about the club that I'm visiting. My online stalker will then know where to look for me and with my picture in Twitter he can easily recognize me, put something in my drink and take a drugged me to his place where I could end up raped and/or murdered.
Do people realize that tweets could be very valuable for criminals???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The babble on twitter is quite useful! For criminals...
Do people realize that tweets could be very valuable for criminals???
i agree, twitter supports terrorism. we need to pass a law that makes it and all social networking illegal, for the children.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The babble on twitter is quite useful! For criminals...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seriously, people, you have a LOT of other risks to take into account before Twitter. Both me and many people I know tweet regularly about our movements, and we're yet to have any problems. Until I hear about somebody actually getting into trouble via microblogging, sorry, it's just fear-of-the-unknown talk. And even then, I'll still be more likely to run into one of the aforementioned dangers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Felix
And about stalkers, there's always a risk for that although it does depend on your online behavior. I just wonder how many teens are tweeting and how many adults are listening to their tweets, hoping for a chance to meet one of those.
Criminals won't just go for one person. They just collect information and then filter this data until they find some interesting victim. This can happen with any site, not just Tweeter. It's just that people seem to have far less problems providing personal information over the Internet than by person. And there are far more people who can overhear them!
Example: I used this URL to query twitter: http://twitter.com/#search?q=visit%20parade%20amsterdam
It only provided three members, but I do find a Dutch guy there, tweeting. He has his own website, thus his own domain so I could check the domain registration to find his address and I know he's visiting the parade (well, a week ago) so he's not home by then. A nice moment to visit his place, right?
Still, most criminals aren't so technical inclined to just search on the Internet for possible targets, which explains why it's still very rare. The Internet is about 20 years old and Twitter is even younger. Crime hasn't adjusted to this new technique yet. Just keep in mind that a century ago, most people wouldn't even need to lock their door, car, bike, horse or whatever. There were still many dishonest people but the possessions of the average civilian just weren't interesting enough to steal.
There's one other risk with twitter, though. It was recently proven that there's a botnet active that misused Twitter to send commands to all the bots. It worked because Twitter access goes over port 80, while an email-based command system would require access to port 25/110. The latter is blocked more often.
Never heard about problems with holiday tweet notifications? Then read this: http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10260183-83.html
Well, it could just have been a random act but could Twitter have had a part in this? Let's just assume it could be possible, thus take no risks...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Felix
It may well be that he's right, after all. Just because you're paranoid it doesn't mean someone isn't out to get you. But he may well be wrong, and even if he isn't, many more burglary victims are targeted by other means. (Hint: pay attention to the evening news.) After all, there were lots of burglaries before the Internet as well. Problably more, come to think of it. And the methods that work back then are still good, and time-tested to boot. Remember that criminals (like wild animals, and the laws of physics) follow the path of least resistance. For good reason, too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Felix
I was in my kitchen the other week and looked out the window to see some kid looking in my back yard. Looked like Kilroy with his head and hands up over the back wall. My first thought was, "That's odd." Second thought was, "I'm being cased."
After he jumped down and got into the passenger side of a pickup, I went out, got the truck's description as it drove away, moved around my patio furniture, and left the porch lights on.
Cops came by a couple days later investigating a robbery next door. Neighbor's dark and empty house was the one that got knocked off. Gave them Kilroy's description and the truck. Cops closed the case later in the week, catching the high-school-aged pick-up owner and three pals with a couple thousand in stolen electronics.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Felix
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Looking at the way they break down the traffic I'm not surprised by the results, even if the authors are. The study authors started with a premise that twitter "was
being used predominantly for self‐promotion". This is what they claim they intended to prove with this analysis. But they've restricted what they consider "self-promotion" to corporate promotion only, any individual self-promotion is relegated to the "pointless babble" category. If you find it surprising that a system designed for individuals to interact with each other has less than 6% corporate promotional messages on it then you really need to reconsider what you're doing.
Maybe I'm wrong but I think this article should also be included in the "pointless babble" category.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In the example in the story a tweet about someone eating resulted in the author meeting up with them. This is an example of a tweet to a gain.
How about a tweet of someone using the washroom. Now lets imagine a fire breaks out and they are locked in. The tweet being noticed, saves a life. Unlikely perhaps but a tweet to a gain no less.
Even tweeting that you are breathing could result in the gain that someone could warn you to wear breathing protection. If they have some idea where you are at least. Unlikely but possible and with gain.
Yet in each scenario they sound stupid until you realize the gain that occurred. If no gain ever occurred, the argument could be postulated that they were pointless; but if even the smallest chance exists for it to prove of any value at all, its not worthless but a preparation.
I'm not a twitterer but it seems to me that complaining about it is stupid if you don't use it. If you do accept a few messages not being directly relevant to you. I can guarantee it isn't built to surround you alone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I believe it's even more pointless to point out how pointless is pointing out the pointlessness of Twitter is. Then again, commenting on how pointless it is to point out the pointlessness of pointing out the pointlessness of Twitter is even more pointless.
Ay-aya! My head hurts!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Casual Friday for Social Media
See my declaration below:
http://www.theyippie.com/TheYippie.com_/The_Yippie/Entries/2009/8/31_Yipsdom_of_the_Day.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]