No Surprise Here: Pirate Bay Acquisition Falling Apart

The AP Not So Happy About Reporting Restrictions When It Goes In The Other Direction

from the good-for-us,-not-for-them dept

Fri, Aug 21st 2009 2:40pm — Mike Masnick

Well, this is amusing. Remember how the AP is trying to limit how others can report on or make use of AP news? Right. Hold that thought. Now remember how the Southeastern Conference (SEC) is trying to restrict how both the fans and reporters can report on games? Well, you know what's coming next. Stephen points out that the AP is now protesting the SEC's policies. Apparently, the AP is only a fan of such reporting restrictions when it impacts others rather than themselves. The full letter (pdf) sent to the SEC by the AP and some other reporting groups takes issue with many of the restrictions, and apparently doesn't notice the irony in the fact that the AP is trying to restrict others in much the same way.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: reporting, restrictions, sec
Companies: associated press

11 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 21 Aug 2009 @ 3:03pm

There is no irony, no contradictions. It's all consistent. All you have to do is assume the AP is self interested and all contradictions disappear.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 21 Aug 2009 @ 3:41pm
  
  Re:
  Of course they're self-interested, although their restrictions are obviously not beneficial to themselves. However, they do at least try to justify their actions with logic, and there is a pretty substantial contradiction there.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - bigpicture, 21 Aug 2009 @ 4:00pm
    
    Re: Re: contradictions
    Suicide probably seems logical to the ones participating in it, but not so for most others.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 21 Aug 2009 @ 6:03pm
    
    Re: Re:
    "although their restrictions are obviously not beneficial to themselves. "
    
    Sure, now convince them of this.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 21 Aug 2009 @ 4:44pm
  
  Re:
  Is it just me or does anyone else think that the AP is probably like a group of like 3 or 4 people, who, until recently, laughed all the way to the bank on how they bulldog'ed the entire news industry...?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Obi-Wan, 21 Aug 2009 @ 7:19pm
  
  Re:
  *waves hand*
  
  These aren't the contradictions your looking for.
  
  The AP can go about its business.
  
  Move along.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Aug 2009 @ 4:09pm

If this loonacy continues...
the AP may have to work on something to keep their reporters. Surely the reporters who contribute to the AP won't stand for this. It will be interesting to see how this plays out. But sadly, the AP may soon have to resort to similar tactics used by questionable timeshare dealers-- promises of week long vacations and spa getaways in return for presentations and indoctrination on how DRM is going to spread news faster, sell more papers, and be welcomed with open arms by customers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Aug 2009 @ 5:16pm

Those AP parasites! Stealing the news from the poor... SEC...thing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
senshikaze (profile), 21 Aug 2009 @ 8:45pm

Take that!
I am not sure whether to weep or laugh.
Im going to go for 2 until i do 1.
This is pretty sad all around. Really both should be beaten by consumers.
And I am a consumer of the SEC
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I ought to register a username (profile), 22 Aug 2009 @ 9:00am

Implosion imminent?
Seems like the AP is just making itself more and more irrelevant. I found an interesting perspective from Jay Garmon over at The Written Weird: I want a newspaper that DOESN'T include AP content.

Not directly related to this particular instance of the AP's shennanigans, Jay says, "Thankfully, once the AP's DRM kicks in, I'll have a nice, simple way to screen out all the endlessly duplicated AP clone-stories from my feeds and get the actual analysis and opinion about the sports -- and other subjects -- I truly care about."

Hm.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hephaestus (profile), 22 Aug 2009 @ 11:47pm

Open and almost free offer to ALL news org that use the AP....
"Almost free" means you need your own hardware and I will put together the software....

The offer is simple I will remove all AP charges from your books by making them superfluous (serving no useful purpose; having no excuse for being). What I need is the following....

What does the AP do for you?
Who are the other news orgs that subscribe?
What are the contractual agreements with other news orgs?
How much are you being charged by AP?

Simply put AP is no longer needed and can be replaced by technology.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]