Amazon Wins Lawsuit Saying It Didn't Infringe On One Click Patent (A Different One)

from the keep-it-straight-now dept

Thu, Aug 27th 2009 12:18pm — Mike Masnick

You probably recall that Amazon holds a rather infamous patent, on one-click ordering online, that has been involved in a fair amount of controversy (and ongoing review). However, less well-known was that, back in 2006, another company, Cordance, claimed that it actually held a patent on one-click ordering and sued Amazon for violating its patent. I hadn't heard much else about the case since, but Michael Scott alerts us to the news that Amazon has won the lawsuit, after a jury found that the company didn't infringe on two of the patents in question, and that the third patent was invalid. The key to victory? Apparently, Amazon explained that the patents in question actually described a process that involved two clicks rather than one.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: e-commerce, one-click, patents, two-click
Companies: amazon, cordance

14 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Ryan, 27 Aug 2009 @ 12:21pm

I bet hurry up and submit my three-click patent, I guess...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Steve R. (profile), 27 Aug 2009 @ 12:46pm

Spin Doctors at Work
I wonder how much slicing and dicing of the verbiage occurred to invalidate one patent will "preserving" their (Amazon) patent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Chronno S. Trigger (profile), 27 Aug 2009 @ 12:49pm

one click?
I don't know how the one click works. Don't you have to tell it what payment method you have to use and what address you want it shipped to and what shipping method you need? And of course, they need to attempt to sell you their credit card. And you initially have to click on the link to the item you wish to one click purchase. How is that one click?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- ChurchHatesTucker (profile), 27 Aug 2009 @ 12:52pm
  
  Re: one click?
  You fill out the form beforehand. So when you're on the site it's, er, several clicks, but THEN you SUBMIT the order with ONE CLICK(tm) and that's totally different than anything anybody would have come up with ever.
  
  Yeah, I don't know how they sleep at night either. Prolly just wipe their tears with dollar bills....
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Sean T Henry (profile), 27 Aug 2009 @ 1:21pm
    
    Re: Re: one click?
    Sleep is just One-Click away (Patent pending).
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- :Lobo Santo (profile), 27 Aug 2009 @ 12:56pm
  
  Re: one click?
  With an up-to-date customer database; pre-recorded "use this credit card" info, no validation of shipping address (or rather, inline clickless address verification, and provided the customer is already logged in; then a one-click "Buy Now" operation could be quite seamless, as well as literally being 'One Click.'
  
  [ sarcasm ]
  I personally think the creators of OC should sue Amazon over their One Click patent--ya know, for trademark infringement.
  [ /sarcasm ]
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- scarr (profile), 27 Aug 2009 @ 1:33pm
  
  Re: one click?
  One click = default settings
  
  Regardless of what these people claim, I can and do make one click purchases a number of times a week.
  
  In many cases, you don't have to even click on the page for the item if you don't want to. The buttons are provided up front.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Chronno S. Trigger (profile), 27 Aug 2009 @ 1:53pm
    
    Re: Re: one click?
    Yeah, that sounds scary as hell. Don't use the one click option if you have known issues of "click happy" (like me).
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - HolaJohnny (profile), 27 Aug 2009 @ 5:06pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: one click?
      You should be scared... internet porn has certainly caused many cases of "click happy:
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 27 Aug 2009 @ 5:27pm
  
  Re: one click?
  "I don't know how the one click works."
  
  Every time you click your mouse you owe me money. Now pay up.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 27 Aug 2009 @ 5:34pm
    
    Re: Re: one click?
    and if you click it two times it's a double click so you owe me thrice as much (single click = $ + single click = $, single click + single click = double click = more $. $ + $ + $ = 3$).
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
!nterroban?, 27 Aug 2009 @ 1:02pm

i think now would be a good time to register a patent on 'one "touch" ordering' for pages specifically created for or recognising smart/touch phones.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
AnonCow, 29 Aug 2009 @ 4:41pm

Unless your browser can read your mind and open to the Amazon product page of the item you are thinking about purchasing when you launch the application, you have to make more than one click to purchase anything on the Internet...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
AnonCow, 29 Aug 2009 @ 4:45pm

It's like a version of "Name That Tune" produced by the USPTO except that EVERYONE loses in the long run.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]