Guy Uploads Book To Google, Selects Wrong Option... Sues Google For Infringement
from the that'll-go-far dept
Eric Goldman alerts us to yet another lawsuit concerning Google's book scanning project -- even as it's deep in negotiations to come up with a new settlement with authors and publishers. Somehow... I doubt this new lawsuit is one that will cause too much turmoil within Google, however, as it appears to be a self-published author (representing himself in the lawsuit as well) who uploaded his own book to Google and then was confused about how the controls worked... so he decided to sue for copyright infringement. The full lawsuit is here:Listing my entire book on the internet minimized my chances of finding other chances of finding publishers and buyers because they listed the entire book on the internet.But, as you read through the supporting documents, including the helpful emails from Google staff, it becomes clear that the guy misunderstood how Google Books works. After uploading his own book, there's an option to choose how much of the book is made available. He chose 100%, incorrectly believing that 100% meant none of the book would be published. Instead, he just keeps demanding that only the specific pages he wants Google to publish should be published. Google doesn't appear to have that functionality... so the guy is suing for copyright infringement. Somehow, I don't expect this case will get very far.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, google books, lawsuits
Companies: google
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Wait, What?
What's the precedent for that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Wait, What?
Sounds like he came up with a new excuse to sue Google.
"I want money, let me purposely pretend like I accidentally uploaded my book with the wrong option and sue Google."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Wait, What?
Yep. And money. Couple this with the Carly Simon vs. Starbuck's story that just appeared on td and you pretty much have the point stories you need to describe "A Nation of Dunces." Or a pair of me-too examples. Seems like both have ample means and ways to make money more efficiently than by suite. "Se la guerre."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Wait, What?
I've been going over legal records for hours now, and no reference to a moron with a lot of time on his hands. A few morons in a hurry... A few hundred morons that get sent to DC... Nope, nothing about a moron with a lot of time on his hands. I'll get to work writing up a law to deal with this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Seriously, though, his interpretation of 100% no download? They explained it to you, chief. You failed to comprehend. That doesn't give you the right to sue, nor does it mean you're going to win.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wow with pithy and inventive writing like that sample, I'm shocked he's not already famous!
"He chose 100%, incorrectly believing that 100% meant none of the book would be published"
Seriously, I can't understand why he expects Google to go through the process of scanning his book, only to not publish any of it. Exactly what advantage does that give Google? And what does it do for the author as no one is able to read it he's unable to gain any new fans or publishing deals!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why didn't he...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
re: The Magic Signature Act ....
"This is not a formal summons or notification from the court, but my request to ... blah blah blah ... in order to save the cost of serving you with a juducial summons..."
The guy is an Idiot and cheap ....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: re: The Magic Signature Act ....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: re: The Magic Signature Act ....
http://www.google.com/search?q=The+Magic+Signature+Act&pov=117588723651043943722&usg= __6_NoX7SgCkW6yRgCW8pnkuEHSEQ=
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: re: The Magic Signature Act ....
Before you call other people idiots, you may want to make sure you're not being one yourself. It's pretty obvious that the summons waiver is standard procedure if you just read the thing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This poor guys has to "live in fear" that people will use his "intellectual ideas without [his] benefit."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He he is folks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Here he is folks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Whoops
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Perhaps he's actually smarter that we're giving him credit for, I bet at least a few people are going to rush off and download the book before it goes away 'just to spite him'
I'd never even heard of Tony Benjamin before, now I have. And they say any publicity is good publicity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
After all it never my fault so I must sue everyone else.
Not if the stupid where not so stupid they could be rich!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"This sounds like a good business plan to me.
After all it never my fault so I must sue everyone else.
Not if the stupid where not so stupid they could be rich!"
This is the US in a nutshell, at least for everyone outside of US. The things people sue for is mindboggling and yet somehow perfectly normal here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Tomorrow in the Future you will have Have Absolutely to defend yourself against the non stop Spiritual Cruelty Satanic Demons have instore for your Immortal Soul that will not be able to Sleep or Die !"
I wouldve bought his book, but alas, it was free on the internet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Or something....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The REAL problem with the internet
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The REAL problem with the internet
Albert Einstein
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The man is listed as a disabled dependent adult
On an other note, I am dying to read this book!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The man is listed as a disabled dependent adult
Way to kill my vindictive buzz, dude.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The man is listed as a disabled dependent adult
On an other note, I am dying to read this book!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The man is listed as a disabled dependent adult
One page of the filing appears to be a form for proceeding in court without paying fees due to financial hardship of paying such fees.
On that page he list, as a dependent, a disabled adult named Antonio V. Benjamin. Probably an adult disabled child.
He also lists his car (a 1990 Mazda) and cash assets and debts. If you can get the $500 he claims for the car his net worth winds up roughly negative $250.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I know this guy!!
http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/0/229/88130-26709-grampa-simpson_large.jpg
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
not a concern
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Have I got a publishing deal for him
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I love this part:
There you go. This must be a "spiritual technique" to earn money!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
it hurts!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If you are blessed with an outgoing personality and physically attractive then the sky is the limits on what you can earn as an entertainer who reads people signature at festivals, private parties and public events."
Pfft, I'm out. You can't just read the book, you also have to be hot.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This nutcase is a ticking timebomb just waiting to go off.
http://tinyurl.com/yfyzool
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"Shelly is guilty of being Unholy
to Punish AJ for a crime he didnot [sic] do is Evil
but to do it on CHRISTMAS EVE (the day before we celebrate the most Righteous Being who walked this earth)
make me think Shelly was trying to Punish Jesus Christ too!"
-from "AJ Search for Justice", page AJ-05-18.
I'm not sure whether to be terrified or laugh my ass off. Throughout the so-called book he calls this Shelly a 'new age Nazi', a 'demon' and 'an anti-Christian' among other things. All that anger towards this woman, and he only worked at Timberland two days! As a probationary employee, no less.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Actually it might not be that stupid....
2. Sue Google
3. Streisand Effect.
4. $$$$$$
Of course this wont apply if the book is awful.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
OK, so now I've looked at his book on Google
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
copyright infringement
Regardless or what percentage of the book I wanted published, Google listed the book with a registration number that was not my ISBN or Copyright Number.
The number Google listed my book with was an inquiry number that was waiting for a response from me and I was waiting for a response from them. There publishing my entire book on the internet was a malicious act of spitefulness in my opinion because of theories I wrote in this book or other books I wrote.
As a man with black skin in a white racist society that justifies racism, dehumanizing words like idiot and moron are things I have accepted about myself from people who believe they are superior or so God Like and judge other human beings.
The same mentality that justifies you calling me an idiot and moron, is the same mentality that justified slavery(making and entire group of people 3/5 of a human being) sexism (denying females the right to vote until 1917)
and poverty(justifying some people having to live or enough food to eat).
The right to respect is still the previlege of a few so called superior beings who are so perfect that they do not have to worry about getting old, getting sick or have fears about being victim of crimes.
Congratualations on a job well done, your comments made me feel like idiot and moron, your words make me regret the day I was born, but I know Google put my entire book on the internet for other personal reasons and violated my rights as a copyright owner.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: copyright infringement
I can actually see how someone would be confused. But the label on that field was "Book Browsable %". So the "100%" referred to the amount that was browsable, and the "No Download" meant that although the user could browse, they could not actually download it to their computer. Furthermore, there was a "?" icon, which you could have clicked if you were confused, that presumably would have given specific instructions on how to use that field.
I don't think anyone here even knew your race until you brought it up.
See, this is where your theory breaks down. Do you think Google hates you so much that they were just waiting for you to submit a book to them so they could publish more than you wanted? Do you think that they purposely changed their options to be confusing to everyone, just to get you in particular?
That's silly. Until you sued them, Google probably had no idea who you were. Also, if it got out that they were targeting users in this manner, it would be the end of them as a company. They don't want to be ended. So it's pretty unlikely that they would even try it.
And also: 9 views with 389 pages viewed? That's not even enough pages for two people to have read the entire book. The effect was minimal.
I hope not. People on the Internet insult other people all the time. If you search for "idiot" or "moron" on this site alone you will get hundreds of results.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]