Swedish Court Backs ISP In Not Handing Over Data On Accused 'Pirate'

from the nice-to-see-some-sanity dept

Earlier this year, Sweden put its anti-piracy IPRED law into effect, and earlier this summer we noted that the ISP ePhone was refusing to give up a user's IP address, and appealing a court ruling ordering it to do so. The details of the specific case suggested a unique circumstance, involving a server that supposedly contained infringing material -- but which was never made public. It was always behind a password and thus, Ephone argued, there was no infringement. While the lower court disagreed, the appeals court has overturned the lower ruling, saying that probable cause for infringement had not been shown. Given some of the recent rulings in the Swedish court system on copyright issues, it's nice to see a court not just accept the entertainment industry's claims on some of these things...
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: copyright, ipred, sweden
Companies: ephone


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. icon
    Tor (profile), 16 Oct 2009 @ 7:00am

    Analysis of and thoughts about the decision

    Here's a copy of my comment in the earlier thread motivated by this new ruling:
    "Today Ephone won the appeal since the court didn't feel that it had been proven that anyone else than the Anti-piracy agency had accessed. In short, there can be no "making public" without the public having access.

    The decision was not unanimous (3 against 2). One of the judges who supported the overturning of the previous decision was Kristina Boutz who has as of late been accused of bias in the Pirate Bay trial (although I think those allegations have been dismissed by a court now)."


    It's also interesting to note that the two judges who opposed this decision used the same argument as the lower court: since the anti-piracy agency showed with their screenshots that there were many files (seemingly pirated judging by their names) on the server there are, because of this, probably also many users who have access to the server. Making the files available to these users counts as making available copyrighted works to the public.

    How anyone could think that many files implies many users is beyond me. So although the decision turned out right this time there was considerable disagreement and some really twisted arguments involved.

    ePhone had invested a lot of time and energy in their defense which was extremely well-written. Now the audio book companies will need to pay ePhone €20 000 to cover their legal expenses.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. icon
    Tor (profile), 17 Oct 2009 @ 9:25am

    Update: appeal to supreme court

    Now the audio book companies have appealed to the supreme court, which is normally hesitant to try cases revolving primarily around evaluation of evidence. Whether the appeal will be accepted or not is still an open question.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. icon
    www.eZee.se (profile), 17 Oct 2009 @ 9:55am

    Its also worth mentioning that the antipiracy people *hacked* into the computer to get at the files which were sitting being a username/password login.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. icon
    Tor (profile), 19 Oct 2009 @ 12:22am

    Re:

    I don't think that has been established, although it depends on what you mean by "hacked". I find it more likely that they gained access by exerting some kind of pressure on someone who had access to the server (or by paying him off). However, either way it's criminal to use login credentials that you are not supposed to have access to (just like you cannot enter someone else's house if you find the hiding place of the key).

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.