File Sharing Sites Team Up To Help Promote Indie Films
from the no-legitimate-purpose? dept
While some continue to insist that there's nothing good or legal that comes from file sharing sites, many content creators who have embraced those sites have found them to be wonderful tools for distribution and promotion. Now, it looks like a bunch of them are teaming up to do even more. Mininova, The Pirate Bay, isoHunt, Miro, Vuze and Frostwire have all agreed to work with a new project called Vodo, which will help promote indie films. Filmmakers can offer their films through Vodo and get promoted on the various file sharing sites -- and the system is designed to let people easily donate. While I'm not a huge fan of a pure "donation" business model, it should be interesting to see how Vodo evolves over time. Certainly, it could be a valuable tool to indie filmmakers who recognize that obscurity is a much bigger threat to their efforts than piracy.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: file sharing, films, p2p, promotion
Companies: frostwire, isohunt, mininova, miro, the pirate bay, vodo, vuze
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Before you rail and call them dinosaurs, bear in mind that an entire industry has been built in conformance with long established rules defined by law. As a consequence, binding contract proliferate on a multinational basis, and due deferrence must be paid to such contracts. Perhaps as these contracts wind down changes will be in the offing, but until then these contracts exert considerable influence on the wiggle room available to labels.
Just like a large ship cannot change direction on a dime, the same is true of large companies. The fact change may take more time than some people demand (I want it NOW) is no valid reason to ignore our system of laws.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
The fact they are actively trying to get laws passed to prevent that change means you are full of shit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
If it were up to them change would never happen and we would still be in the stone age. We can't hinder progress just because it threatens the profit margins of rich and powerful people who want to continue to make money without doing any work. That's nonsense.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Laws that are put in place because they, and others like them, lobbied for it in them first place KNOWING darn well that they are bad for society but not caring because they are too selfish to care (and that hasn't changed).
"but until then these contracts exert considerable influence on the wiggle room available to labels."
Well tough, we can't prevent laws from changing for the better just because two parties might have a contract based on old laws. This argument could be used to prevent just about any law from changing and based on this laws would never change.
"No, this is NOT what the labels fear."
You're either lying or deluded.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
If we ignored/changed our system of laws NOW change will happen NOW, in the amount of time that people demand (it will not take more time than what people demand). The fact that you may not like the change because it may mean you have to actually work to make money instead of making it from monopoly rents off of the back of artists and others who worked hard while you did nothing is no reason for us not to change.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I love how IP maximalists make this argument when discussing copyright... but the second you bring up patents, they claim that as soon as a disruptive innovation comes along, these big companies will "steal" the idea and run with it.
So which is it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Then they disregard the first mover advantage only when they think that disregarding it helps their pro intellectual property position but then they turn around and claim that 12 - 24 months is too long (those 12 - 24 months support the first mover advantage) to wait for everyone to catch up (despite the fact they want 20 years) when they think that helps their position.
Intellectual property maximists can't even make up their stupid minds, they contradict themselves left and right and they are just trying to come up with any excuse, no matter how lame and false, to promote their position and the only ones that believe them are our bribed government who then impose ridiculous laws on the masses. and despite the fact that the majority of the people don't seem to like the RIAA and just want them to go out of business because of their corrupt practice the government still serves their interest at public expense ( http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091015/1907526556.shtml )even when the RIAA contradicts itself ( http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090614/2223175228.shtml ). Why are these people allowed to make a mockery out of justice like this?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
As for your comment re patents, you obviously have me confused with someone else.
As for ships changing direction, apparently your experience dealing with multinational contracts is somewhat limited. At times it seems almost as if you advocate the unilateral breach of contracts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
""The RIAA lists its member labels on their website [1]. However, their website lists not only includes RIAA labels but non-RIAA labels that are distributors that report to the RIAA. The site is outdated and has not been updated since 2003.""
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090820/0218425942.shtml
(Aug 21st, 2009 @ 10:21am)
This has nothing to do with the lie that "it's not good if change happens too fast" (I never seen them argue that when the change benefits them at public expense). It's an issue of they don't want any change that benefits the public, they want to maintain the laws that benefit them at public expense and they want change that makes the laws more beneficial to them at public expense.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Us Now follows the fate of Ebbsfleet United, a football club owned and run by its fans; Zopa, a bank in which everyone is the manager; and Couch Surfing, a vast online network whose members share their homes with strangers."
http://vodo.net/usnow
http://vodo.net/tor/24ec1f97b8288b15943096278dcf11c4487416e0
Could the monopoly over mainstream media that the government has unethically given to the status quo in the world of sports (where they have gotten so powerful thanks to their lobbying efforts that they prevent sports players and news media from discussing certain issues and they can assert intellectual property on anything that happens during their game) be over? Mark my words, evil people are working endlessly to take away our rights and control us and to destroy any bit of consumer surplus and turn it into producer surplus and if we don't stand up for what's right our rights will be taken away.
Back in the days no one would have thought the airwaves would be controlled the way they are and look at how bad things have gotten. Look how bad intellectual property laws have gotten (ie: they now last way too long). Just about everything the government does is to benefit the rich and the powerful at public expense (from the FCC to the FDA to the USTPO to taxi cab medallions). The government creates huge barriers to entry when it comes to telco/cableco companies and they regulate the airwaves to benefit rich corporations at public expense and as a result important issues and viewpoints/arguments are censored while we are fed almost nothing but lies and commercials and cable is completely overly priced. The reason for this? Our unwillingness to stand up for what's right. If we don't stand up for what's right the Internet will turn into the nonsense that cable television and public airwaves have turned into. Not only must we stand to resist this but we must stand to overturn the existing laws that benefit only rich corporations at public expense.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not only must we prevent them from doing this to the Internet but we must overturn the laws that give rich corporations exclusive control over the airwaves to use them in their interest at public expense.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I should also say that I am not inclined to trust a vox populi system, wherein users vote a film up or down to determine what is worthy of promotion. This sets the bar down around the lowest common denominator. I want people with excellent taste selecting the films. We can only wait and see if the Vodo team has it or not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's another nice play by the guys at TPB.
BTW Mike, why didn't you cover their recent move, 4 day shutdown, and loss of connectivity again?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
And TPB went on an internet hopping trip 'cause of bogus legal threats to various samllish access suppliers, and of course due to censoring in Holland after some even more bogus legal proceedings. Still they were only down for a very short time at times for most, apparently.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
First... I didn't know about it. Second, even if I did, I'm not sure that really matters? What's the story angle there?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: a nice play by TPB
Cheers, J.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
re: comment 16
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: re: comment 16
In the world of Mike, maybe, but not in the real world.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: re: comment 16
[ link to this | view in chronology ]