eBook Market Gets More Crowded... But... Still Many Limitations
from the it's-a-start dept
As lots of tech sites are reporting (and as was leaked not too long ago), Barnes & Noble has released its own ebook reader, clearly designed to compete with the Kindle. The good news is that it takes aim at some of Kindle's weaknesses, such as by supporting more open offerings, like ePub, and also by allowing you to "lend" books to others. But the lending is pretty limited. You can only lend a book once, and then only for two weeks, after which the lent book disappears. It's nice that you'll be able to buy books from other retailers and use them on the Nook, but the limitations still seem pretty serious. Still, more competition is good, and even a slight step towards a more open solution is a step in the right direction. Next up: we just need someone else (perhaps not tied to a bookstore) to offer an even more open device.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: ebooks, epub, lending, open
Companies: barnes & noble
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
That would be a true lend.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Much better
Nook is definitely a step in the right direction because it is somewhat open. I made the TV analogy to administrators. TV grew up as an open platform. Anyone could build a TV that would pick up anyone's broadcasts, and broadcasters could have their programming played on any standard hardware. The approach taken by Amazon and Sony is an attempt to control the entire platform and get some profit from the hardware all the way through the user purchasing (and possibly repurchasing if their unit goes bad) their books. We would still be listening to the radio if Sony and Amazon had invented TV.
I just hope that Barnes and Nobles doesn't get cold feet like the last time they released an ebook device.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I vaguely remember having a high level interview with Amazon a few years ago about Kindle. And in typical Anon Coward fashon, I told them how it wasn't going to be anything spectacular, how people want color, how people don't want to leave their young kids home with a $300 piece of machinery that if they sit on, or put in their backpack the wrong way, it could be broken. Who pays for it?
At the time, I thought the whole thing was a joke.
I am not sold on eBooks or these readers on any level. I just can't see how it can replace a $10.00 paperback unless, as I said to the interviewer "You re-train everyone to treat a Kindle as a $400 book. Then that's interesting. How do you treat you Bible?" I asked.
Audible Silence..
Still not sold on eBooks on ANY LEVEL.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: well, there are those who do...
I predict that it is largely a matter of time and refinement before paper-based books eventually fade away. It may take 2-3 decades, but the advantages are clear albeit not very cost competitive at this moment in time. But costs of the devices will start to drop sharply as competition increases (already seeing this) and usage increases (already seeing this too).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Is the lending really all that "limited"?
From what I can tell, their lending implementation is better than what can be done in the world of paper-books in at least one aspect: When you lend the book to a friend, you still retain a copy that you're able to read. Hard to do with a paper-book.
Demanding that the devices and the BN.com bookstore be completely DRM-free sounds to me like a totally unreasonable demand. DRM is not, be definition, pure evil IMO. The support for ePub means millions of public domain books from multiple sources can be read, which is really quite amazing, IMO.
In general, this looks like a strong step in a good direction. I'm still a big user of audio books/audible.com, but if and when I do return to the printed word, it will most likely be in eBook form.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Ever live in Midtown Manhattan? That's where I am after living in Redmond and Seattle. I could still find enough shelf space for myself and all the books I wanted to read. I guess it comes down to prioritization, and valuating what you bring based on a dollar value per sq foot, which suprisingly, CostCo remains higher than WalMart. Gee. Where did I learn that from?
I really think you're full of shit and have no idea what you're talking about.
Thanks, Pitabread, and Thanks, Mike for deleting all my fake profiles. Each of them had a different storyline, and each was going to be a winning Pulitzer Prize Novel. I thought you respected creativity. Now I have to go back and reconstruct everything. Mike, you're a real ass sometimes, Mike. Fuck, even "Mike this is your mother"turns up nothing.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Other Ebook Readers
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: True lending
** And the point of that would be?
The point would be that you'd maybe miss the book and ask for it back and the borrower would go and get his own.
It would also stop you behaving like an unauthrosied public library at the expense of the author.
Have to agree with the poster who says nopt all DRM is pure evil.
Demanding that everything be free just because someone somewhere can get round DRM is not a defensible position.
When DRM becomes evil is when it inconveniences the innocent (like CD's that won't play or rootkits).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
I LOL'ed when I read that a few months ago. It's one of the few things I remember. And when even Dark Helmet asked if it was fake. But if we go and delete our own subculture, what's left? I guess it's sometimes good to laugh at ourselves, and then bring it up.
I guess I kinda agree with you in an odd way.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
I did no such thing.
Each of them had a different storyline, and each was going to be a winning Pulitzer Prize Novel.
Well, then good luck to you. They were not deleted.
Now I have to go back and reconstruct everything. Mike, you're a real ass sometimes, Mike. Fuck, even "Mike this is your mother"turns up nothing.
You should try using our own comment search engine. It finds the comment just fine:
http://www.techdirt.com/article.php?sid=20090813/0126395864#c41
We don't delete comments other than spam.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
LOL. Man, it is pathetic, actually. Just like everything else I do here. Yeah, better put that Pulizer Prize aspiration off for a while.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
me too product
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Here's why I am very strongly considering getting one. I have a couple of long shelves of reference books that I use frequently. I'm a network engineer and I have about a dozen Cisco books for reference and study. Additionally, I'm a non-professional programmer and I have a couple dozen programming reference books. These books are anywhere from 300 to 600 pages each. Almost every one of them comes with a CD which includes a PDF of the book. The ability to take those hundred plus pounds of paper, put them in a 12 ounce device and stick them in my backpack is absolutely killer. And if I can throw a few $10 paperbacks in as well, that's just bonus.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Is the lending really all that "limited"?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: True lending
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Honestly that feature alone completely removes any hard ties from B&N and sells me on the nook. At that point I can put on any book I want. The problem with the Kindle is that you can only put books purchased through Amazon on it, at least with the nook you never need to actually purchase a book if all you load on it are freely available ePub and PDF files.
And it looks like a slick piece of hardware. There's also the feature that allows you to take it into a brick & mortar store and read eBooks for free in-store (not sure on specifics on this but it seems pretty cool). And it plays MP3s which will be great for language learning eBooks that have audio lessons along with them.
Personally, I'm sold on the nook. I've wanted an eReader, but the Kindle is too totalitarian and Sony has done little as a company to instill customer loyalty with its media divisions and their near-black hat security measures.
All of my books are going to be open ePub files or PDF files anyway, so "lending" anyone a book will be as simple as copying from my memory stick onto their nook. The "lending" restrictions only apply if you are dealing with B&N purchased eBooks. I have an iPod full of MP3s, and I'll have a nook full of PDFs.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Reader? Hmm....
I for one will wait for the PC to arrive there before I purchase one. But thats just me.... :)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: True lending
and what's the difference between an authorized library and an unauthorized one? funding by the state?
Have to agree with the poster who says nopt all DRM is pure evil.
Demanding that everything be free just because someone somewhere can get round DRM is not a defensible position.
all DRM is pure evil in that it only ever affects the "innocent". DRM has no effect on piracy. in fact, it encourages it:
1) DRM doesn't work. it's based on a faulty implementation of cryptography: encrypted content is given to the user, who is also the attacker. along with the key to decrypt the content. this is why all DRM schemes get cracked within minutes, the authorization keys are put into the hands of attackers.
2) DRM doesn't stop piracy. pirated versions are not DRM'd. the DRM is either stripped prior to upload, or simply pirated from an unencrypted source.
3) DRM only hurts legitimate users. it only limits the actions of your paying customers and makes pirated versions with no restrictions more valuable than your paid product. meanwhile, piracy continues without ever coming into contact with DRM (see #2)
4) DRM encourages piracy: once the DRM scheme burns a legitimate user, that user will turn to piracy for a usable copy of the media they bought. in the future, what's to stop them from just skipping the buying step?
Demanding that everything be free just because someone somewhere can get round DRM is not a defensible position.
it's not a position. it's a fact of life. everything digital is already out there, for free, in the clear, for whoever wants to take it, and there is nothing that can be done to stop it.
it's a guarantee, a mathematical certainty, that content will be downloaded without authorization and no amount of whining will fix that. time and money invested attempts to control the copying of bits on the internet is time and money wasted, in fact, it might very well be time and money invested in ill will on the part of paying customers.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It supports doc, txt, rtf, html, lit, non-drm'ed mobi, pdf and drm'ed epub, and more.
Yeah, you have to load it with a SD card or USB cable, but it will take just about any ebook you try to put on it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Here here chris
Demanding that everything be free just because someone somewhere can get round DRM is not a defensible position. it's not a position. it's a fact of life. everything digital is already out there, for free, in the clear, for whoever wants to take it, and there is nothing that can be done to stop it. it's a guarantee, a mathematical certainty, that content will be downloaded without authorization and no amount of whining will fix that. time and money invested attempts to control the copying of bits on the internet is time and money wasted, in fact, it might very well be time and money invested in ill will on the part of paying customers.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
B&N Online Library
[ link to this | view in thread ]