Filmmaker Gives Newspapers Bogus Stories To See If They Fact Check
from the guess-what-he-found-out? dept
Rose M. Welch alerts us to the news of a filmmaker who wanted to see how much fact checking newspaper do, so he started calling them with totally made up "tips" about celebrities, and discovered that many of them were quickly printed with little to no attempt to fact check them at all. To be fair, the stories were all sent to UK tabloids, and the tabs aren't exactly known for their thorough reporting standards -- but still, given how often we hear about how bad new media online publications are at basic fact checking, it's worth pointing out that just because you print on paper, it doesn't mean there's any more fact checking. At least with online stories, people can respond quickly (often in comments or on their own sites) and challenge things. In print, it's much harder to see what others are saying on the same topic.Filed Under: fact check, newspapers
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nothing new
If you rely on the papers for anything more than gossip and football scores, which, surprisingly, are still reported without bias, than you deserve what you get.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
$50 bounty
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: $50 bounty
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: $50 bounty
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bogus reports from filmmaker
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bogus reports from filmmaker
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Shield
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Real Story Is...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Same 20 years ago
Not a tabloid, and well before digital news stole the paper media's profits.
Nothing new here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fact checking
I still remember (with horror) an article in English that talked about some bad things that happened in Brazil, and said that a source had blamed it on drug dealers.
I read the SAME story in Spanish, which said the SAME thing, but then said that on further checking the reporter had found that the police were primarily responsible.
It appears the police had planted the "source" story to divert attention from their activities (all too common in the US as well, IMO).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]