Disney's Keychest: Is Giving Back Your Fair Use Rights With More DRM Really A Step Forward?
from the redefining-fair-use dept
A bunch of folks have sent in different stories about Disney's new "Keychest" technology offering, which would (in theory) allow users to purchase content that would be stored online, and which they could then access from any "participating service."With Keychest, when a consumer buys a movie from a participating store, his accounts with other participating services--such as a mobile-phone provider or a video-on-demand cable service--would be updated to show the title as available for viewing. The movies wouldn't be downloaded; rather, they would reside with each particular delivery company, such as the Internet service provider, cable company or phone company.The idea, supposedly is:
to address two of the biggest hurdles blocking widespread consumer adoption of movie downloads: the difficulty of playing a movie back on devices other than a PC or laptop, and limited storage space on those computers' hard drives.Now, while you must admit that allowing people to access the same content after a single purchase on multiple devices is definitely a step up from the "old" way of doing things, it does kind of ignore some important points: such as the fact that, for the most part, you could already do this on your own. As we know, it's legal to rip your CD's and then store that content on an iPod or on your computer and listen to the music how you want to do so. And, even though this is perfectly legitimate fair use of content for movies as well, Hollywood has used the worst provision in the DMCA -- the anti-circumvention provision -- to block people from doing what is accepted fair use with movie and television content.
So all Keychest really seems to be doing is giving you back your fair use rights on content -- but also wrapping it in additional DRM, such that it only works on "participating services." Oh, and it could include other limitations as well:
And Keychest would allow movie studios to dictate how many devices, connected to which distribution networks, a given title can be played on.So, kudos to Disney for recognizing that people hate having to buy the same content over and over again and hate being limited on what devices they can view content on... but, creating a new, more permissive DRM solution, just to give back some of an individual's fair use rights, isn't really a huge win.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: buy once, content, copyright, drm, fair use, keychest
Companies: disney
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Better
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anyway, I'd be averse to letting ANY company (such as Disney) have access and control over MY content, that I bought. Yeah, looks ok now but watch it creep and creep and creep.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm surprised...
What happens to your locked up content when Disney decides that Keychest is no longer a profitable venture and shuts it down?
While I think the concept is a step in the right direction, the execution screams "EPIC FAIL".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I'm surprised...
The same thing that happened with MSN Music ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I'm surprised...
Not only that, but you would have to have a consistent high speed connection in order to use your video. So much for watching on the train, or letting the kids watch that movie in the Van on the way to grandma's.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I'm surprised...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I'm surprised...
you have to buy it again, just like yo did with the CD and the DVD. duh.
don't tell me you "fair use pirates" want to buy something, be able to play it on anything, and have it never become obsoleted?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Convenience and creepiness
Personally, the creepiest part of this is it lets Disney know exactly who is buying their physical products. The conspiracy theorist in my wonders if they will be tying physical purchases to pirated material.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Or is it presently in the "Disney vault" along with Walt's head.
People sure were ignorant back then. 1928 was a long time ago. If you told them that one day the people would travel to the moon they would have laughed in your face. Science fiction!
It's a good thing that small piece of our cultural heritage is locked away. We shouldn't be allowed to touch it, at least, not without paying for the privelage.
You should always pay for the things from our past. You don't expect to get to the future by stealing, now do you?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Disney has done it again...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
hard drive space not enough
Today you can get a 500GB hard drive for less than $50 and that would hold more movie than you would ever watch in a year.
BAH!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
While I'm sure that not too long from now there'll be a clever way to "rip" the movies from the net and stick them in an .flv file, I don't like the fact that this takes ALL the power out of the consumers' hands and gives it to the content owners.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I Want To Be Good Like Citizen Kane
[ link to this | view in chronology ]