Italian Politician Tries To File Charges Against 4,609 YouTube Commenters
from the thin-skin,-much? dept
Boing Boing points us to a story coming out of Italy, concerning what appears to be a former politician with a... colorful past, Salvatore Cuffaro (he was apparently found guilty of helping the Mafia), who is upset about the comments on a YouTube video that involves himself, but which is from the early 90s. So, he's "laid charges" against all 4,609 commenters (since then, many more have commented). I'm not familiar enough with the legal system of Italy to quite understand what these charges mean, but the link above comes from an Italian political party, Italia dei Valori, which apparently is considered "anti-corruption." Apparently, that party is offering to cover the legal defense of any of the commenters who need the help. The translated text from Italia dei Valori isn't entirely clear -- and I'm not even sure what's wrong with the video or the commenters, or what people are being charged with exactly -- so please help fill in the blanks in the comments. However, any time you have a politician even threatening to sue thousands of YouTube commenters, you know something has gone wrong.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: comments, italia dei valori, italy, lawsuits, salvatore cuffaro, youtube
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Hmm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hmm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hmm
Nice chilling effect DH.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hmm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
To the contrary, it means something has gone right.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
@JT
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
how many of those are outside of Italy?
It gets even more muddy if the video is hosted in the US and commented on by someone in the US. Bah!
I really hope this is one instance where Google refuses to roll over (like it seems to be doing a lot lately) and actually fights back on it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Fish N Gritz
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Fish N Gritz
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If only because it means that someone, possibly a judge or a lawyer, would have to read a youtube comment out loud, in a courtroom. And I would pay to see that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
First of all the reportage is incomplete, and the information is spotty at best, with most major issues unknown, so of course, there's got to be every idiot on the web sounding off their opinions on something that hasn't even been adequately presented in the first place. Glad they're not still burning witches, sure wouldn't take much to get someone burnt around here!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Build a bridge out of him!!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]