Licensing Agreements Now Covering 'The Universe' And Future Media Not Yet Developed
from the about-time dept
In the past, we've had a bunch of stories about TV shows being released on DVDs having to change their music to deal with the fact that it wasn't licensed for DVD release originally (often because when the TV shows were on the air, there was no such thing as a DVR -- or even a VCR -- so it couldn't even have been predicted). Then, of course, there have been a series of famous lawsuits over whether or not publications can "republish" their old magazines in electronic format, because freelancers who wrote the original articles only signed licenses for the single publication.However, it looks like lawyers drafting such legal arrangements are beginning to recognize this as an issue and are trying to prepare for such eventual new media opportunities. Eric Goldman alerts us to a WSJ article, highlighting how phrases like "in all media, throughout the universe" are becoming increasingly common in licensing contract language. While some decry this as being imprecise and overly broad, I tend to fall on the other side of the fence. Not having those types of clauses in agreements in decades past have resulted in a lot of long and drawn out lawsuits (and old content that simply cannot be repurposed for modern media). Better to have the language seem ridiculously inclusive than lose culture to history because no one predicted the next popular format.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Other Universes
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Other Universes
That reminds me, it's time for another reading of Timeline, by Michael Crichton...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Other Universes
The Universe comprises everything that physically exists, the entirety of space and time, all forms of matter and energy, and the physical laws and constants that govern them.
Good thinking there, though.
As much as I despise lawyers, there are times when their craft nears an art form; and that one particular phrase "...in all media which presently exists or has yet to be developed or discovered, throughout the universe, in perpetuity..." rings true. It is quite exact in its phrasing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
When in the course of.....
---dr k
PS How about the eloquence of "When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one party to proclaim plenar rights to the expressive configurement of God's free elements....such that no other creature of God's firmament can, shall or will borrow, steal, or God Forbid, copy, said configurement now, ever or never......unless I say so, the Supreme Court says so...or it is learned that it has been in the public domain for 2000 years and is a reconfigurement of an obscure bible story. In the event a court of competent jurisdiction adjudicates to my favor and blesses my palm with Ben Franklins, 1/2 of that money will go for the public benefit through The Grammys Musicare or other such greater "artistic / creative" community benefit. This goes for my attorney too, who will donate half his fees for the greater creative good. If providence allows me to accumulate over $100 million from my creative expression, all rights to my work past that will be considered public domain after a 3 year run at exclusivity...... by the people, for the people..[the creative spirit] shall not perish from this earth."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Other Universes
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Other Universes
So company A in universe A claims copyright over item A in all universes while company B in universe B claims copyright over item A(alt) in all universes.
So who owns the copyright? does universe A supreme court have jurisdiction over universe B?
I should go watch that futurama episode where professor created all those boxes containing universes...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Other Universes
If your work is independently made, you can have copyright on it. Even if it happens to be the same as someone else's independently made work. This has actually happened in the past with tables of logarithms, for example. Yes, they were once hand-calculated and subject to copyright.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2008/09/estdomains.html
Effectively by buying up all the items in the chain (domain registrar, hosting, IP blocks, bandwidth providers, interconnects, etc) they create a system that was almost unbreakable.
Complain about spam? Heck, complain to the host! Heck, complain to the host's host. Complain to the bandwidth provider. Complain to the IP block holder. complain to anyone - you are all complaining to the same person. All of those individual items would be considered "230 exempt", and actually getting down to the bottom and seeing who is spamming was almost impossible.
230 is blessed protection for some, it is also a great way to scam for others.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
This, like most of life's problems, can be solved with proper application of explosives.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Universe is not enough
Then again, some technology that is not classified as "media" will come along in the future, and make all this terminology obsolete anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The Universe is not enough
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The Universe is not enough
Then again, the government probably already has such technology but it's being suppressed from the public.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The Universe is not enough
All we need now is the RIAA/MPAA getting "throughout the multiverse" added to the next batch copyright laws, and I get billed for the downloading of copyrighted media.
Because in a infinite number universes at least one of me downloaded every possible song & movie created, known and unknown, in every possible format, known and unknown.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Of course, the broadest definition is likely something like "any 'tangible medium of expression' to which the law of copyright applies." But that may not be appropriate for every license, because it could surreptitiously sweep in some derivative work rights (which may not even be the author's to give).
It is interesting to me to see content publishers scrambling and spending time, effort, and money to try to remedy the fact that our broken copyright law has ugly and unintended consequences. When commercial actors are having to create private-law (ie - contract) remedies for the harshness and stupidity of public laws designed to protect the same commercial actors, isn't there a problem?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
easily stated as overly broad
meanwhile, it's important that people have to specify what they want in a contract. If it's "in the universe" why not just make it simply and say "anywhere"?
oh right, ambiguous/overbroad, same reason they're trying to make it overbroad with "universe".
Products can have iterations, derivatives specified. The more we allow this contract creep, the more it will cause further issues down the road too in copyright and patents, easily.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What's wrong with this?
It'll be the next big commercial market and trillions will be made. Just remember in the future of Animalism, all animals will be equal, but some animals will be more equal than others.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Next up...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
...and God
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good Luck with that
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Beyond the beyond...
Here's the dr kopp e wright phrase that takes it to the next level of possibility
(Gene Roddenberry, Steven Spielberg, Carl Sagan, are you listening??)
Here's the new magic phrase: "in all media throughout the universe and beyond..."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
artful drafting
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: artful drafting
And therefore we shouldn't discuss them?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]