Texas Pulls Voting Reg System From IBM After Multimillion System Can't Recover Lost Data
from the that's-not-good dept
EFF points us to yet another massively expensive computer system that can't do some rather basic things. Apparently the state of Texas has pulled its election systems from an $863 million computer system project it had with IBM, after failures and glitches in the system took down the voter system and lost data, which was unrecoverable. State officials realized that if this had happened during an actual election, the state wouldn't have been able to verify new voters, in violation of federal law. So, it dumped IBM and set up its own system that (gasp) actually has multiple backups of the data. I guess things like redundant backups aren't included in the $863 million package.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: backup, computer systems, texas
Companies: ibm
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Figures...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Figures...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Figures...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Figures...
Whatever means were used to select IBM and whatever requirements were not given (or given and not met) are clearly at least part of the problem here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I wonder...
I'm thrilled to see TX protect voter rights, but I don't trust the state to protect voter's rights on principle alone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
that option is not included from the factory, the dealer has to install it...duh!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
re
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Backups don't guarantee recover is posible
When was the last time you tested your backup system? The answer for most people is never.
And what if the government does a worse job at this than the private sector. I can hardly wait.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What did you expect
These people are SO incompetent, they can't even get govt work right. No wonder the U.S. economy is going into the toilet with India, Inc. running everything.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Backups don't guarantee recover is posible
HDDs + Virtual Filesystems + resources management + security probes.
The only thing missing is the endless redundancy from the Linux core that have thousands of backups all over the world so unless the end of humanity or the world comes there will be linux kernels somewhere LoL
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
IBM, once killed jews
From a qualitative analysis standpoint, I wonder how is this going to affect "big iron" sales.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]