It's The TSA, Not CSI: Actions Limited To Security, Not Crime Investigation

Entertainment Industry Wants More People To Know About OpenBitTorrent Tracker

from the for-what-reason? dept

Wed, Nov 18th 2009 4:22pm — Mike Masnick

The definition of insanity, the saying goes, is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. For the past decade, the entertainment industry has sued one site or service after another that was used for unauthorized file sharing at some time. In every single case, the act of suing that site or service ended up only serving to massively increase attention and usage of those services. Suing Napster made Napster into the service to use. Ditto with Kazaa and Grokster. The Pirate Bay wasn't that big until Hollywood got Swedish authorities to raid the operations and confiscate the servers.

So, here we go again -- except this time it's even more ridiculous. Entertainment industry representatives have filed a lawsuit against the OpenBitTorrent tracker's hosting company (Update: noting that the lawsuit is against the hosting company), which is not a file sharing site or service at all. It's just an open tracker. Now, I recognize that folks in the entertainment industry aren't particularly knowledgeable about how technology works, but at some point, aren't they supposed to at least understand the basics? The tracker alone is not responsible for anything here -- and even more ridiculous is that the OpenBitTorrent guys (despite not being in the US) set up a DMCA-like process for taking down any info_hash if they want (which, by the way, was the reason the industry claimed it didn't sue Google -- because it took down links on request -- but now that OpenBitTorrent does the same thing, it's a problem?). Either way, with the rise of trackerless solutions means that even taking this site down won't much matter. Still, it makes you wonder what they're thinking over in the entertainment industry other than ways to increase their legal bills.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: bittorrent, lawsuits, trackers
Companies: openbittorrent

25 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

vyvyan, 18 Nov 2009 @ 4:34pm

I think the article of TorrentFreak said, they have filed lawsuit against OpeBitTorrent's hosting company, Portlane.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DocMenach (profile), 18 Nov 2009 @ 4:54pm

I think I found it!
Still, it makes you wonder what they're thinking over in the entertainment industry other than ways to increase their legal bills.

That's it right there. When lawyers are the ones making the decisions, they make decisions that benefit lawyers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
senshikaze (profile), 18 Nov 2009 @ 5:41pm

So anyone want to make a data haven like in Cryptonomicon? We need an idland country starving for cash with a king/queen/prime minister/president/dictator/whatever that won't interfere and big pipes to the internet's backbone.

I have a dream, and it is free data.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- ChurchHatesTucker (profile), 18 Nov 2009 @ 6:13pm
  
  Re:
  "So anyone want to make a data haven like in Cryptonomicon?"
  
  Nah, countries can be invaded, embargoed, etc. Encryption is the way to go. "Hide" the data everywhere.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Urza9814, 18 Nov 2009 @ 9:08pm
    
    Re: Re:
    Exactly what I was gonna say. Why use an island nation that can easily be taken out? We already have a data haven, it's called FCON.
    
    http://fcon.sourceforge.net
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
scarr (profile), 18 Nov 2009 @ 5:43pm

"Insanity"
"The definition of insanity, the saying goes, is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."

This faux-definition bothers me (especially the frequent attribution to Einstein to make it sound more important). Anyone who has studied modern physics knows there are plenty of things you can do the same way and get different outcomes.

/nerding
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Lucretious, 18 Nov 2009 @ 6:00pm
  
  Re: "Insanity"
  It's particularly oft quoted in 12-step meetings where it's actually quite accurate to how one behaves in the throes of addictive behavior.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- nerdier nerd, 18 Nov 2009 @ 6:51pm
  
  Re: "Insanity"
  actually, the key word is EXPECTING. yes, some things can result in a different outcome, but the different outcome is not the norm, and thus not logically expected, so the definition holds.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - flamsmark (profile), 19 Nov 2009 @ 9:51am
    
    Re: Re: "Insanity"
    When I roll a pair of dice, I expect significant variation in the outcome. I'd be insane to think that snake-eyes would come up every time.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 19 Nov 2009 @ 6:54pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: "Insanity"
      not if the dice are fixed
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 19 Nov 2009 @ 4:29am
  
  Re: "Insanity"
  –noun, plural -ties. 1. the condition of being insane; a derangement of the mind.
  2. Law. such unsoundness of mind as affects legal responsibility or capacity.
  3. Psychiatry. (formerly) psychosis.
  4. extreme folly; senselessness; foolhardiness.
  
  this is the definition of insanity.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - batch, 19 Nov 2009 @ 3:19pm
    
    Re: Re: "Insanity"
    #1 and 4 define the *AAs, and they are lacking in Psychiatry. They should seek some.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 18 Nov 2009 @ 5:45pm

The entertainment industry is screwed and here's why. This is an anecdote.

I overheard a conversation in a coffee shop where the man, a minister, was talking about how his kid downloaded Wolverine for him.

He was delighted at this. He didn't have to leave his house to go rent the movie. His kid downloaded it. This minister was amazed.

Give it a few more years and either the movie industry will have to adapt to a changing landscape or it will wither up and die.

And nothing of value was lost.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lucretious, 18 Nov 2009 @ 5:56pm

Cool, I didn't even know about this site. *bookmark added*

Thank you music industry! :D
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 18 Nov 2009 @ 6:05pm

It's obviously an evil raporist website that must be destroyed. After all, it has "torrent" in the name, so it must be true.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- nasch (profile), 19 Nov 2009 @ 7:45am
  
  Re:
  I wonder what would happen if you put up a site called "democracyandpuppiestorrent.com"... would they have the cojones to go after puppies and democracy?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 18 Nov 2009 @ 6:30pm

It's amazing how something as useless and harmful to society as intellectual property can do so much to hinder such a useful and beneficial innovation like the opebittorrent tracker. This isn't about stopping piracy, the record labels and the government have made that VERY clear by making it very difficult for independent artists to release their music on corporate owned airwaves and on corporate owned cableco/telco infrastructure and by ensuring a monopoly on those airwaves and on that infrastructure. This is about ensuring that ALL content that is easily accessible to the public is only available at monopoly prices and that independent artists and movie makers get censored. This is EXACTLY what Hollywood et all seek to accomplish in their efforts and the evidence is that they have accomplished just that outside the Internet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 18 Nov 2009 @ 6:38pm
  
  Re:
  No doubt. Another form of competition to these industries is the public domain. Ever wonder why, in the United States at least, why the cut-off date for works entering the public domain is 1923?
  
  If copyright lasted a reasonable amount of time, let's say, all told, 28 years, then everything made prior to 1991 would be in the public domain!
  
  It would be free for anyone to take and experiment with. I'm sure the public would waste a lot of precious time reconsuming artistic works from their youth.
  
  And not spend as much time, or money, on whatever the entertainment industry is pumping out in the here and now.
  
  Of course, they would have access to all that work as well but then again, the entertainment industry isn't known for it's forward-looking abilities.
  
  "I say to you that the INTERNET is to the American film producer and the American public as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone." - The Greatest Shill of All Time
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Alan Gerow (profile), 18 Nov 2009 @ 10:02pm
    
    Re: Re:
    Just to nitpick, 1991 was 18 years ago.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Hephaestus (profile), 19 Nov 2009 @ 8:05am
    
    Re: Re:
    28 yrs = 1981 not 1991
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 19 Nov 2009 @ 2:16pm
    
    Re: Re:
    Way to do basic math, me. And another thing, don't forget to pick up the drycleaning.
    
    Everything before 1981 being in the public domain still sounds pretty sweet.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Vic, 18 Nov 2009 @ 7:35pm

That's your third (fourth, fifth, ...) party
They are doing exactly what I expected them to do - they are going after third, then fourth and fifth parties... Pretty soon they are going to prove that strictly speaking (using their laws and logic) everybody is a criminal.

Next in line - people whose donations might have gone to sites that could have been kinda hosting torrent how-to's.

Next - those people's employers. 'Cause those money came from them. ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- vyvyan, 18 Nov 2009 @ 11:25pm
  
  Re: That's your third (fourth, fifth, ...) party
  Just wondering how many years it will take them to blame Mitochondrial Eve for piracy?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 18 Nov 2009 @ 9:23pm

The fact is that the damage that intellectual property is causing our society has gone far enough. THIS NEEDS TO STOP!!! NO ONE OWES ANYONE A MONOPOLY and we should NOT allow something as harmful as intellectual property to hinder perfectly good innovations for no good reason.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Daemon_ZOGG (profile), 19 Nov 2009 @ 12:09am

MAFIAA/RIAA..
These stupid idiots are headed down the same road as what used to be the SCO Group(UNIX).
" http://techdirt.com/articles/20040303/076202.shtml "
" http://techdirt.com/articles/20090824/2244595987.shtml "

Yeah.. that hole just keeps getting deeper and deeper.
I certainly won't miss them. Time for these MAFIAA groups to go the way of the dinosaur. Since they are THAT OLD, anyway.
CDs have out-lived their use. Just as 8-track & cassette tapes have. DVDs are not too far behind them.
ARRRRRRRR!
;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]