Local UK Newspaper Chain Tries A Paywall
from the good-luck dept
Slowly, but surely, we're seeing some regional newspapers try out a paywall. We've already seen Newsday, on Long Island, put up a paywall, but it's more about reducing churn than actually getting people to pay (and early reports are that not many are paying). Now, as a bunch of readers sent in, Johnston Press, in the UK has announced a paywall as well, asking £5 for three months of access (which certainly beats Newsday's ridiculous $5/week plan. I'm glad that some newspapers are actually trying this out, as it was getting a bit tiresome hearing them all threaten to do so without any actual action. Now we can actually see what happens. Of course, my opinion on the matter has been clear. I think it will be a lot more difficult to get people to pay than these publishers believe, and it will be a lot more expensive to manage than they believe. Also, the writers for the papers behind paywalls might not like the fact that no one knows who they are any more. At the same time, it will only serve to open up the competitive market for others to come in at a better price point (i.e., "free") and scoop up a significant percentage of the advertisers who are seeking to reach a larger audience.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: journalism, newsappers, paywall, uk
Companies: johnston press
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
They might ..
http://www.boingboing.net/2009/11/30/why-the-paywalls-tha.html
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
If you can charge twice
Seems like the biggest pay-wall re-inventors didn't fare too well in their ingenious buy-everything-real-estate-just-before-the-economy-collapses-muhahaha-plan.
Guess, maybe it wasn't just the biggest ones who suddenly felt the need for more cash all of a whopping sudden.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: They might ..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: They might ..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: They might ..
Mike doesn't also grasp the idea that not all websites want just the most viewers, but rather they want a profitable business model.
Here is maybe a way to explain it: Much of online ads are sold on CPM rates, and sites are often getting very small payouts, well under $1 for 1000 views net per page. So if your site gets 2 page views per user, you are generating $2 per 1000 users. It isn't hard to see where a subscription, at say $5 per week (Newsday) means that you can lose 90%+ of your viewership and still make about as much money, and experience lower distribtuion costs, less machine costs, etc. Plus, the eyeballs that you do have are paying to be there, and thus even more valuable to the limited number of advertisers you have to put into the online edition.
The online theory is that "more is good", but the wrong more isn't always good.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: They might ..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: They might ..
The usual answer here is "use an ad broker to put ads out there relevant to those users". This is nice, but it often defeats the true nature of a local paper. Local papers sell local ads to local business to talk to local people. Pulling those ads out and replacing them with generic sized ad units that are managed by someone else would remove the local aspects of the paper, and defeat their true usefulness to the local people.
A local market paper doesn't need all of the internet, and it's a poor assumption to think that every local newspaper that happens to be online would want to build their business on getting eyeballs from outside of their market.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: They might ..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: They might ..
I guess that the actual subscribers they got would probably have donated as much that way - and the extra "free" eyeballs might also have chipped in a little.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
local news
Really it's down to a scarcity of information - noone else reports on local news here. In a national or international scope, all the papers report on essentially the same information (except the Darwin [Northern Territory capital, Australia] papers, who write about cows being rescued from the sea and crocodiles in the main street :) ).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: local news
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/nov/30/journalism-paywall-johnston-press
It was amusing to see a business decision being transformed into traditional journalism being crusaders against injustice.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: They might ..
Then they can block Google in 5 minutes.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Local News method: - Press in the address bar, any three keys twice, which are together on keyboard in downward diagnal angle e.g. http://99iijj.com [Ctrl+Enter = www. . com]. This option is working from whole keyboard. After this you will see a web page of http://local-news.atoall.com Now non English world can read news on internet by http://atoall.com theory.
[ link to this | view in thread ]