Russian ISP Blocking Political Opposition Websites

from the this-is-the-concern dept

I am still not convinced that we need special laws mandating net neutrality, but I find the arguments from telcos that no one would ever block sites or services to be highly unbelievable. There have been cases of it happening in the past, and there are cases of it happening now. Shocklee points us to the news that a Russian ISP has been blocking websites that the government has dubbed "extremist," even though they include political opposition sites like Garry Kasparov’s Kasparov.ru, Solidarity's Rusolidarnost.ru and the National Bolshevik Party's Nazbol.ru. Combine that with attempts in the UK and Australia to give the government the ability to make up secret lists of sites that should be blocked by ISPs, and you can see why some believe it's important, as a fundamental principle, that ISPs should allow access to any site. US telcos say that they are in the business of encouraging free speech, and they would be crazy to block sites, but what we're seeing around the world suggests that there are times when ISPs do decide to block sites, and it's often due to political pressure from governing parties.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: blocking, censorship, net neutrality, politics, russia, websites


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    ChurchHatesTucker (profile), 18 Dec 2009 @ 5:58pm

    Yeah...

    The more I hear about this crap, the more into the 'net neutrality' camp I go. Political considerations start to outweigh the technical ones.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Lobo Santo's Anti Mike Ugly pet Angry Aardvark, 18 Dec 2009 @ 6:14pm

      Re: Yeah...

      But we can not have a government take over of our internets. What are you some kind of fascist commie ?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Dah Bear!, 18 Dec 2009 @ 6:04pm

    In russian, users block isp!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    UK Democrat, 18 Dec 2009 @ 6:20pm

    So, the UK will soon be doing the same after the Digital Bill allows any gov't puppet to do the same by dictat with scruteny by the lame parliament or anyone else.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Slanted, 18 Dec 2009 @ 7:10pm

    Home is where the URL is

    Uses are subjective, those that hold you captive, hold your attention. AT&T’s secrete room was the start, NBComast is going to be the future and a terrorized congress will be our end.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    ., 18 Dec 2009 @ 7:19pm

    Well if people are not willing to put it on paper any government will be glad to look to the other side and do what it "must" LoL

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 19 Dec 2009 @ 7:41am

      Re: Free Press

      You would like to have a net nanny isp then ?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        bob, 19 Dec 2009 @ 7:43am

        Re: Re: Free Press

        Interesting inference you made to my post, my answer NO!

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 19 Dec 2009 @ 10:17pm

          Re: Re: Re: Free Press

          Interesting inference you made to my post, my answer NO!

          Well, that's the alternative.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    ., 19 Dec 2009 @ 7:42am

    Real net neutrality would be to separate transport and content.

    All lines should be shared by all competitors that should build infra-structure together and no one should be able to discriminate traffic at the transport level only at the service level.

    The pipes are dumb and the explosion of ISPs will regulate the market better then anything anyone could do.

    Instead of having 2 or 3 options how people would like to receive a paper with 100 of ISP offerings?

    You pay one bill for transport and other to access your service provider.

    That is a truly competitive market.

    It works in Asia and in some parts of Europe why it wouldn't work elsewhere?

    Without competition there is only one solution, legislation and is not even good is just not as bad as leaving the market to the whims of two or three monopolistic companies.

    Now even with competition governments still would have the chance to block something, and is right there the problem, without puting it in writing governments don't care to abide to commom sense or society only their interests.

    Those the need to put at leas guidelines defining where we want to go.

    Like the constitution that don't define laws but say how those laws should be governed and show to society what the laws were intended for it even stops the government from legislating at will.

    * First Amendment – Establishment Clause, Free Exercise Clause; freedom of speech, of the press, Freedom of Religion, and of assembly; right to petition,

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


    The internet should have one first emendement too.

    "Congress should make no law respecting traffic of data, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, the press, the public or free way of passage"

    It could be better I know but the idea of a compass is what I really want to see writen, laws will come after those guidelines are in place.

    If there is no compass people just go in any direction, confusion takes place and governments and special interests takes over.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      wayne, 10 Jan 2010 @ 3:30pm

      Re:

      a lot of difference between saying "no law shall be enacted regarding the free exercise " etc. and passing a law saying "the free exercise (etc) shall not be infringed."

      your formulation offers absolutely no protection to me personally whatsoever, and frankly, I gotta be on MY side.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    ., 19 Dec 2009 @ 7:43am

    Internet Bill of Rights.

    We need those rights to be writen in plain simple language

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Hephaestus (profile), 19 Dec 2009 @ 8:51am

    This is another one of those ...

    This is another one of those ... Its a good things ...I want this to continue. Oppression happens on many levels. Humanity has gotten to the point where anyone can talk to anyone else, almost instantly regardless of what the government in charge wants.

    Its a scary thing for the government in charge. The problem is People create groups and get together outside the allowed limits imposed by government.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Dec 2009 @ 8:34pm

    This is Russia, what do you expect?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Yosi, 20 Dec 2009 @ 5:29am

      Re:

      Of cause, in "civilized" US, nobody will eavesdrop to you without court order, right?

      link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.