Behind The Scenes Of The Duke Nukem Vaporware Party And Demise
from the gotta-launch dept
Back in May the "lifetime achievement" award winner (many times over) in vaporware, Duke Nukem Forever, officially went onto the permanent vaporware list as developer 3D Realms shut down. So what happened? How could one video game be under development for a dozen years, and despite promos from over a decade ago, still never come out? Clive Thompson, over at Wired, tried to piece together an autopsy of Duke Nukem Forever.As with just about anything Thompson writes, it's a great read, with some interesting lessons. While the crux of the story is that 3D Realms boss, George Broussard, had the earlier success stuck on his brain, it seems like there are a few other things to be learned. There is definitely this undercurrent of "this game must be perfect before it can be released" that runs through the whole story. And, in fact, that probably only got worse with time. Every year the game wasn't released, the more it would have to "prove" to eventually live up to its reputation. But even more interesting is the constant changing of game engines. Basically (according to the story) Broussard kept focusing on why the game had to be the absolute best, and so every time a new (better) gaming engine came out, he wanted to use that, and dump all the development done on earlier engines. In some ways it's a story that shows why just copying what other people do isn't enough. By the time 3D Realms "caught up" with others (often by licensing their technology), someone else had already jumped ahead and gone further -- leading 3D Realms to pull back and jump on board the next platform... leading to the same situation yet again.
The simple fact was that no one was ever going to be that far ahead of the game any more, and so there are times where you just release what you have and iterate. But 3D Realms put itself in the impossible position of both needing to be leaps and bounds ahead of everyone else, while at the same time relying on the technology of others they hoped to leapfrog. That's a recipe for disaster. You can use others' technologies if you want to be incrementally better, and to then continue to improve. But you're simply not going to be so far ahead of the game that no one is ever going to catch you. And it appears that 3D Realms never got past that contradiction.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: duke nukem forever, perfection, vaporware
Companies: 3d realms
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
From Duke Himself
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Impossible
In my mind, that was the recipe for their own disaster - they were always going to be behind the 8-ball if using someone elses engine for the game. One cannot be ahead of the curve if you are using a "curve" designed and released by someone else!
Shame, sounds like Take Two are circling like sharks around the leftovers though. My bet is that Duke Nukem will return...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Impossible
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Impossible
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Impossible
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Too much success, too soon, when he was too young.
It seems he also had a state of mind that is common with many artists, musicians, etc. If he wasn't able to match the success of the original it would mean (in his mind anyhow) that the original success was due to a fluke and not talent. Continually delaying the game would keep him from having to face that fated day. It's easier to just spend your millions, enjoy your extended puberty and not deal with reality
Not an easy situation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: by Lucretious
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
One of the best games possible without top-notch graphics
I've always thought, gameplay was the key, which is why I'm occasionally still playing some retro stuff like The Castles of Doctor Creep.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I am fairly certain that if 3D realms had simply released a design bible, along with outlines of "plot" and level function, people would have been falling all over themselves to produce The Duke's latest hit, across a wide spectrum of engines and design schemes.
They managed to dump cash and time into a bottomless pit while a contest or even an "accidental leak" of information would have brought them the forefront of the industry.. or at least made them less of a joke in the end.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dilbert comes to life
[ link to this | view in chronology ]