Court Dumps Class Action Lawsuit Saying Apple iPod Responsible For Hearing Loss
from the what-did-the-judge-say?--speak-up! dept
A few years back, someone sued Apple, claiming that the iPod caused hearing loss, saying that the devices have an "inherently defective design" and that they need more warnings that you can acquire hearing loss if high volumes are used. The lawsuit eventually turned into a class action, which a district court dismissed. Now an appeals court has agreed, saying that the plaintiffs showed no evidence that an iPod "poses an unreasonable risk of noise-induced hearing loss." Basically, the argument amounted to "you know, Apple could make iPods that are less likely to lead to hearing loss." But that's not legally actionable, and it's good that the courts were quick to point that out.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: class action, hearing loss, ipods, sound
Companies: apple
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
In other news...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: In other news...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
One lawfirm not to hire.
History doth repeat itself indeed.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anyone calling this legislation paternalistic has obviously never forgotten to lock the controls before pocketing their MP3 player when their playlist contains power metal. The three seconds it took me to rip my headphones off were quite enough.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Self Inflicted Wounds
I would to sue these mouth breather, over volume players for making the rest of us suffer the incredibly obnoxious and substandard music being pounded through our skulls twice a day.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
So...
I'm so sick of these shitbag control freaks trying to find ways to protect me from myself. If I want to listen to music loud on a device that I bought and paid for and own, then that's my right and if I go deaf because of it, then I have no one to blame but myself.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: So...
Besides, I'd rather do something proactive to stop some fuckwit destroying their hearing through their own stupidity than pay their disability living allowance.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: So...
> destroying their hearing through their own stupidity than pay
> their disability living allowance.
Yes, that's always the argument of the nanny-state: We have to rob you of your freedom to decide even the most basic and private of things, rob you of all your autonomy, for the good of society. Because, of course, we know better how to live your life than you do.
Like hell.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: So...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: So...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
"Despite Mr. Raynard's claim that his wife's tumor was in the same shape as the cell phone antenna, the case was thrown out for a lack of evidence."
http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4117
I remember seeing this on T.V. once and, IIRC, they had a picture of it and it did resemble the cell phone antenna.
Also note, many of the cell phone - cancer studies are done by industry. Other countries are taking the issue more seriously than the U.S. but the U.S. government only favors industry, they could care less about the consumer, so it wouldn't surprise me if certain studies in the U.S. were censored from the public.
I'm not saying that there is a link between cell phone use and cancer, just that we need to take into consideration the fact that industry does have incentive to skew the data and hide evidence when considering the evidence.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
RF and Brain Cancer VS. Volume related hearing loss....
hearing loss due to you're being too g.d. stupid to turn the volume down should rightly not be an actionable liability.
users know how loud it is, so if the volume is maxed and it doesn't sound loud enough...you've probably got what we call rock and roll ears. you get the same thing from too much time in rehearsal studio with the amps cranked up too high.
brain cancer from a cell phone is an entirely different beast. a "user" can't detect that the close field RF is causing genetic damage (leading to cancer) besides the "mild" heating sensation. the telecom industry can fight the battle for as long as they want...but they will lose the war. RF, even tiny bits of it, cause genetic damage leading to cancer. plain and simple. betcha steve jobs wore his iphone (prototype) on a belt holster for the last 10 years leading to his pancreatic cancer.
telecom is in for a thrashing this decade that will make the cigarette class action suits look pale by comparison. RF causes cancer. no g.d. doubt about it.
use your cell phone and cordless home phones on speaker only or procure a shielded WIRED earpiece. if you can't, don't answer or call from it. blue tooth is just another RF source though better than holding your handset to the side of your brain. however, if wearing the BT headset all day, it defeats any safety effect you'd get from using it just during a call.
Further,...radiation above the normal/natural frequency range causes mitochondrial disfunction so loss of energy to repair the damage caused to the cells.
Combine mitochondrial disfunction and genetic damage and whathaveyougot? CANCER.
___________________________________
Paul F. Becker, Esq., Product Developer
MagnetoTherapy Bahamas, Ltd.
EarthPulse™ Sleep on Command™- the world's only electromagnetic sleep & recovery system
Sleep Your Way to Better Health™, Enhanced Performance and Longer Life
http://www.earthpulsetechnologies.com
U.S.:+1.305.434.7061 / International & Caribbean:+1.242.676.2324 / Canada:+1.778.786.3650 / U.K.:+44.131.516.8138
FAX:+1.772.539.8437
"Nearly all psychological, neurological and physiological disease including aging, is the end result of mitochondrial dysfunction; and NOT the other way around." ~ Paul F. Becker
[ link to this | view in thread ]