Vevo Doesn't Put Ads In YouTube API, Gets Upset When Music Streaming Startup Uses That Fact
from the umm... dept
I actually had decently high hopes for Vevo, the partnership between Universal Music and YouTube to create a website for official music videos (currently from three of the four major record labels). I mean, I always figured that eventually the labels would screw stuff up, but I thought it actually had a shot at maybe being useful. The fact that Universal put Rio Caraeff in charge seemed like a good sign as well, since Caraeff seemed like the sort of music industry exec who understood the new marketplace for music, and wasn't encumbered with the "old ways" of doing things. But rather than a useful site, Vevo has basically been a cookie cutter version of what you would do if the record labels created their own YouTube. That is, it took none of the good parts of YouTube. Hell, it didn't even take the ability to handle a lot of traffic. For the first few days after it launched, Vevo just didn't work at all.Its latest screwup was that it didn't include its preroll ads in the YouTube API, meaning that others who used the API could access and repurpose Vevo content without the ads, and even show the content outside the US (which Vevo currently does not allow). It didn't take long for one enterprising startup, Muziic, to do exactly that. Muziic has received some attention for basically using the YouTube API to create an iTunes-like experience out of YouTube videos (it also gets attention for being founded by a 16-year old). Muziic sent out an announcement this week about how it was using the YouTube API to add Vevo content, meaning you could access Vevo videos without the preroll ads and outside the US.
Vevo's first response? To send a cease and desist. At the very least, it wasn't a legal nastygram, but a more friendly cease & desist sent by Caraeff himself. But "cease" what? Muziic was using the API as designed, and even though Caraeff admits that Vevo is quickly scrambling to change the API, he still says Muziic needs to cease from using the Vevo logo or referencing the company's name. But Muziic used the name in an accurate and descriptive manner. It accurately noted that it was now offering Vevo content -- without ads and outside the US -- all legally via the use of the API provided by YouTube/Vevo itself.
Muziic's co-founder responded to Caraeff's email over at Hypebot, saying that he "was as shocked as anyone when I realized there were not yet any "pre-roll" advertisements for Vevo content in the API," but since it was how the company set up the API, it seems perfectly reasonable to use it that way. He also notes that he had reached out to Vevo prior to this to try to work out an arrangement with the company and got no response.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: api, cease and desist, copyright, music
Companies: muziic, vevo
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Whoops
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
permitted
that's "getting it", which is not spelled vevo.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
why block access?
I was searching for a music video in YouTube, found it but couldn't watch it because Vevo blocked it. So I went to another site to watch it. The Vevo thingy doesn't make YouTube look that good.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: why block access?
aka: the music industry are morons and/or wish to continue fueling piracy so they can point at it as a reason why they're loosing money.
(the real reason for that loss, when/if it even exists, of course, being that they suck)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: why block access?
Thank god I don't have to clean that window because it's huge. The music video is almost ten years old.
By blocking the access they made sure that I won't be interested in visiting that site in the future, even if they would grant an access some day.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: why block access?
it's a publishing/label/licensing issue caused by legacy market consumption conditions. in the past, to purchase music or consume music videos (by TV, Radio, Etc...) in a specific marketplace, you had to make a transaction in that geographic marketplace. the internet renders that physical restraint irrelevant due to the "world wide" aspect of it.
for example, one artist might be on one publisher/label for distribution in the US, and another in Australia. in that case, Vevo's or the US label's contracts might cover the publishing costs for usage within the US. however, if a particular song/artist has different publishing/licensing/label in a different country, it becomes a big PITA. so it's easier to just handle domestic licensing/payments and skip the rest of world (which for what it's worth, can't be fairly monetized through domestic ad-sales anyways).
ps. admittedly,this is a very rough description at best. as such, someone more knowledgable should feel free to fill in the legal details.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google and API
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
YT API
[ link to this | view in chronology ]