Why Schools Should Learn To Use Online Services Like Facebook & YouTube Rather Than Banning Them
from the embrace-and-use,-rather-than-fear-and-block dept
It's no secret that we live in a world of moral panics -- where new technologies are feared by those who don't understand them, often leading to regulations that block their potential. For years now, a number of politicians have sought laws to ban social networks in schools, assuming that they are either bad or simply inappropriate for schools. While those laws have yet to pass, many schools already do ban access to social networks and other sites. I've never quite understood how this makes sense. Rather than training students to use those sites properly, now they're seen as forbidden -- which only makes them more attractive to students, while making it even clearer that students won't be prepared to handle those sites properly. On top of that, as more powerful mobile phones become popular, students will easily bypass the school's own network and access those sites on their own -- and there will be nothing the schools can do about it.So it's nice to see a sensible opinion piece in Slate arguing that rather than ban or block social online services like Facebook and YouTube, schools should be embracing them and looking for ways to incorporate them into the learning process. There are a variety of strong arguments for why this makes sense, but two that stick out:
- Students already like using these sites quite a bit. Using those sites to make other things more relevant and interesting seems like a good way to reach kids in a manner that they understand, and which doesn't feel quite as much like "education," but more like something fun that they want to do.
- Using these kinds of free tools may be cheaper, easier and much more effective than a number of the super expensive e-learning tools out there, which would require a steep learning curve anyway. But incorporating lesson plans and info and assignments into the tools that students already use would be both cheaper and more likely to actually be used.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: embracing, fear, moral panics, schools, social networks
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Technology Theater
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Technology Theater
most school dont want mobiles in the campus is because SOME PEOPLE have the tendency to take photos of there friends and teachers so they are posted online. and these mobiles become very distracting and so the students can not study.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Technology Theater
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
K-8 Problems
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Problem is the Board
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I once worked as editor in chief for a programmer's publication; and one author submitted a story about how to write a program to download videos. We ran the topic by "Google Legal" had they said it was a TOS violation and the story was axed.
I would imagine audio ripping would be a similar violation, but I haven't read the TOS lately.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The problem is, of course, that most people see that an answer to a technical issue is more technology or of blocking the technology. Unfortunately, they don't seem to realize that in most cases, it's a problem of failed management and oversight, not of technology per se. If they did, then they'd see that the actual problem is in the mirror, not the display.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Instanity and unreason
As Ron White says, "You can't fix stupid."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
For some parents, her only way to contact them is on facebook. The school has no formal social media policy.
I believe she did nothing wrong, nothing in violation of any school policy, and can offer no other explanation for the write up other than "People afraid of what they don't understand."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ignorance leads to fear
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
makes no diference
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Teaching the students to use sites?
This logic seems backwards.
It's nice to talk about integrating Facebook into education, but the problem is that the people who are teaching are too old to know how to use it. It's a generation gap. Saying that it makes sense to use Facebook in school without offering any ideas is like saying, yes, it would be wonderful to end world hunger, but without proposing ideas or solutions, what's the point?
Yes, you're right, it would be awesome to have Facebook integrated into education, but the people teaching aren't prepared for it - they're the ones holding it back.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Something you don't realize
As a network security engineer, I'm far more concerned about students that aren't educated in computer security enough to keep from clicking that link, not knowing how to tell that it may be malicious. Even with the best virus protection, some will get through.
Plus, most teachers think of YouTube and Facebook as time wasters that distract kids from focusing on what they should be doing in class, and this is the reality of it. Its really a classroom management issue that falls on the teacher, but opening up sites that are known to be used by students as time wasters doesn't help the teacher manage the class since they can't constantly check to see what every single kid is doing on the computer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You are correct in that we should embrace new techs instead of calling them evil, but this die has more sides than the one you explain. You have the educational side of it, the technical side of it, the parental side of it, the legal side of it, ect.
Add that on top of trying to police for unauthorized content and unauthorized access in general... Like I said, it's pretty much suicide to not keep it under some kind of restraint.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I see, and I learn.
I hear, and I remember.
I do, and I understand.
If only more people would take that approach when dealing with tech and tech issues.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
TOS issues
I have even seen some parents giving their kids the same idea.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
School in the US does nothing anyway 90% of the time, but teach our children how to be conformist. I have 3 children, all 3 struggled in regular school, and didn't do very good at all. So I pulled them out, they now attend school online, I haven't stopped them from accessing MySpace, or You Tube and their grades are better then they ever were in regular school. My Kids have even used these websites as way's to do projects for their school.
Regular Public school as we know it is outdated, and does not work for our kids. If you have kids I highly suggest putting the parenting back in your own hands and finding a way to not send your kids to regular school.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You're right, but they didn't seem to teach you to conform to the rules of basic grammar.
Moving on how can you say your kids grades are better than they were in regular school? Why are you still using grades as the benchmark? If you're just using high grades as your benchmark, then an 'easier' school doesn't actually mean your children are learning any more. If a child gets an A at one school and a C at another, it means the C school is an inferior school? Or does it make your child an inferior student?
But all I see here is another parent who will place the educational duties on the school system rather than realizing that your child has been learning from YOU from day one. And a great job you've done - when regular school is too hard, just put them into an easier one! Higher grades=smarter children is one of the greatest fallacies ever perpetuated - and you keep on perpetuating it you 'anti-conformist' conformist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Only on Techdirt...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There are plenty of other social networking sites that can be used for educational purposes that are not those that pupils are totally obsessed with, and therefore prevent effective use in the classroom.
Yes some teachers are afraid of them, because they don't understand how to use them themselves - but the main problem is children's obsession with sending each other innane messages and their inability to see beyond!
Why not suggest some of the other sites that teachers can use/set up - those that pupils do not have an obsession with, rather than damn teacher for being short sighted.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
dead
But it;s true............
Because we are living in a mad world.......
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Where is the educational content?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]