Rednex Release New Single On Pirate Bay, Explain Why Record Labels Will Die
from the pirate-eyed-joe dept
If you're a NY Yankees fan, for at least the past decade, you've probably become familiar with the song "Cotton Eye Joe" that is played in the middle of the eighth inning of every game. That version of the old southern folks song is done by a Swedish band, Rednex, and the song was quite a hit for the band back in the mid-nineties (hit number 1 on the charts in 15 different countries). Since then, the band has sold millions of albums -- but it has decided to go in a somewhat different direction with its latest music: it's promoting it on The Pirate Bay along with a massive 28 page pamphlet explaining why record labels will die (pdf), but file sharing will thrive -- and they want to be in front of that wave.The explanation shows that the band really does seem to be embracing both aspects of the CwF + RtB mantra. The band says that some of the reason the old record labels don't like them is that they don't try to hold themselves out as being better than their fans, but really like to hang out with the fans and party with them. As for the "RtB" part, the band isn't just giving away its music for free, it's got a variety of ways for fans to support the band and get value back. The band claims that it has no idea how to make money, but that doesn't appear to be the case in reality seeing it offers up a whole bunch of ways to support the band:
At our website one can also get a membership. You can be a free member but also a paying member for anything between 3 to 666 Euro. For this you can get free stuff, such as a cap with a cow that says, "I want moooore!!!" ( ... We didn't say it was funny, just that you could ... ) or free downloads of music, pics and videos, chat with us, read articles and interviews, win backstage passes or even order a prank call from us to your boss in the middle of the night! At the website we also have ads where we get some money if they are clicked on.But the band also realizes that perhaps its fans might have some good RtB ideas as well:
But also -- we want your ideas!! So how the hell can we make a living on our music now?? Tell us. Help us. Call your local bar and tell them to book us for a show! Call Jack Daniels and ask him to sponsor us! Call the circus and ask for vacancies! Any support we can get are we happy for...But in the end the band is sure that file sharing isn't just the future, but that it benefits everyone. While I don't fully agree with the band's claim that record labels will disappear in 12 years (perhaps a more accurate version is that record labels as we know them will disappear in that time), the entire explanation of what's going on in the music business is well worth reading. The band points out, quite accurately, that file sharing is not going away, and the moral and legal questions people raise are pretty pointless. It points out that the big four major record labels have basically done everything wrong with little effort to really adapt. Then, amusingly, they suggest that any employees at such labels might want to bail out sooner rather than later -- to prevent having such a dead end company on the resume for too long. They also suggest that new bands avoid signing with the majors, knowing that from here on out they'll just be stuck in the rapid decline phase.
And, in the end, the band is thrilled about all that opportunity:
Well, well, sad tunes, huh? Actually, not at all! The fact is that this development is only bad news to a few individuals. For the rest of us it's fantastic and hugely beneficial, and not simply in terms getting free access to music and film, but in relieving all costs, borders and delay to obtain access to ALL information across the globe. The benefit to mankind is so monumental that it cannot be compared to anything that we have experienced before.I'm just quoting a few select parts, but an awful lot of the arguments made in the paper sound like what we talk about here. Take, for example, this section on copyright:
This movement is part of something much greater and we all need to expand our perspectives to realise the enormous value and potential that lies within it.
This debate needs to be taken to another level. It is no longer relevant or even interesting to discuss whether someone has the moral right or not to exclusively demand rights to one's music or ideas. It is not at all as clear-cut as the music business and various law enforcement institutions claim.It's a good read, and definitely great to see yet another band that seems to have embraced what the technology allows, and are jumping fully into new business model experiments.
The copyright is definitely not a holy natural right that people acquire at birth. The concept that as soon as someone has an idea they also have the right to it is absurd. Copyright is something that is claimed and needs supporters to then assert the claim. There is nothing wrong in trying to capitalise on one's ideas but it is important to realise that this is not a given right that everyone automatically must agree to and respect.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: business models, music, pirate bay, rednex
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I agree. The labels will disappear in 2013. Unless some very underhanded legislation is passed between now and then.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Consider Star Wars, where the fans actively petitioned to get the non-special edition, non-THX, non-letterboxed versions of the original trilogy on DVD.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Damn, the Mayans were fairly accurate after all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Holy Cow!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
OTOH, the doc is really worth reading and the site is really funny. I'm almost sold on getting a membership, even paying the 30 cents for most of the songs (haven't heard them yet, though).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
hah
They do have subscriptions you can signup for, but I'm not into them THAT much. Even if the cheapest pay membership was 3 EUR per year.
I'm just hoping this works out well for the band and more artists do this for themselves.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seriously though, I didn't realise they'd had such a long career or that they were still around. They certainly didn't have much of one in the UK after their second single dropped out of the charts (which sounded *exactly the same* as the first, IIRC). So much for that major label promotion being necessary for a long career.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And .
Plus .
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: HUH?
Huh?
Your arguments aren't all that coherent or persuasive under the best of circumstances, but *this* takes it to a new level:
1. But WHAT?
2. And....WHAT?
3. Plus....WHAT?
Oh, I see:
Can't actually refute any of the quotes OR accuse Mike of "hyping an agenda" (of course he is -- just like you maximalist-types), so you resort to something that's even more nonsequitur than usual.
Or have you suddenly decided to go all "Zen" on us, and this is some kind of weird new "koan" around which you expect us to wrap our minds, at which time we'll experience "Satori"? Didn't know you had a Bodhi tree in your backyard.
But hey, thanks Anti-Mike: you've successfully created the ultimate "contrarian template" --- just plug in the caveats as needed.
Pretty kewl, actually :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Another guess is that the royalties are cheaper and the artists are more likely to sell out once they get their one hit. It certainly can't hurt Rednex that they probably get a regular paycheck from the Yankies playing the song a hundred times a year.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Truly awesome.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
So, essentially, we should be upset because crappy bands still can't make money?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Really, the arguments against your position are unassailable:
1. Copyright *IS* a limited-term monopoly privilege which, FROM THE BEGINNING was riddled with exceptions because even it's biggest champions understood how dangerously damaging such monopoly privileges could be.
However, thanks to a few multinational corporations various front groups which they control, copyright has metastasized into *exactly* the sort of thing the exceptions and strictly-limited term were intended to prevent.
2. Record labels routinely screw over those stupid enough to actually "sign" with them.
3. "Collection agencies" likewise routinely fail to actually pay the artists.
4. The multinational corporate megaliths routinely attempt to suppress potentially-disruptive technology via hyperolic comparisons to Serial-killers, and apocalyptic predictions that if such technology is "permitted", their victims (oops, I mean "clients") are doomed.
Did I miss anything there, Anti-Mike?
Ps: He's trying as hard as he can -- it's pretty hard to formulate coherent apologia for corporate tyranny with a tumor the size of a lemon rapidly destroying what passes for It's brain.
(Sadly enough, Kevorkian is unavailable, of Anti-Mike would doubtless already have partaken of his services, thus depriving us of such scintillating grandeur as "But....And....Plus".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Troll. Either leave or be made to leave.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think the first "anti-Mike" you were responding to was a poster making fun of the actual "The Anti-Mike," suggesting that he would post shortly and have some sort of B.S. argument against this actual established band doing what its doing.
At least, that's how I read it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rednex
We are a long way from the day when important things are respected over relatively trivial things, but Rednex is going in the right direction.
It is sad that Hedy Lamarr is remembered as a "great" actress, but no one seems to know or care that the cellphone they use is based on technology she developed (almost single handed!).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]