Florida Not A Fan Of The Internet; Potentially Rules Out Lawyer Blogs
from the nice-work dept
You may recall recently that the Florida Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee issued an opinion saying that judges shouldn't use Facebook to connect with any lawyers. This made little sense since judges can, in fact, be friendly with lawyers in real life. There must be something in the water down there, as new rules from the Florida Bar are so broad that they could potentially ban lawyer blogs because of an attempt to more carefully limit how lawyers "advertise" (found via Michael Scott):The substantive rules provide, among other things, that an attorney website can't "describe or characterize the quality of legal services being offered." Rule 4-7.2(c)(2) Thus, I can't tell you in this post that I'm committed to using my legal skills to provide positive results for my clients (even though this is true). And I can't give you information regarding my past results, so I probably shouldn't tell you the true information that I lost a case I argued in a Florida court as cooperating counsel for the ACLU in a "John Doe" case. Rule 4-7.2(c)(1)(F). I also can't include testimonials; therefore, I request any former students or clients not to post comments saying what a wonderful lawyer and/or professor I am. Dramatizations and many other creative marketing devices are also verboten. Of course, my personal concerns about the new bar rules are trivial when set beside those of all the Florida law firms who must now spend vast sums of money to revamp their websites to try to comply with the new rules, not to mention the concerns of non-Florida firms that hire Florida attorneys.That same blog post, by Lyrissa Lidsky, reasonably points out that the First Amendment should protect legal advertising as long as it's not inherently misleading. Of course, this issue has come up in the past as well. Five years ago, we wrote about concerns that laws in Kentucky required "filing fees" for lawyers to pay for "each advertisement" that would make legal blogging in the state prohibitively expensive.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: advertising, blogging, florida, lawyers
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Lawyers, eh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not so sure...
IANAL, but based on the language in his sentence, it seems to me that he COULD say that, because he'd be speaking about the quality of his committment more than the quality of his legal services. He isn't saying his legal services are always outstanding, just that he is committed to his services creating positive results. What lawyer isn't? Doesn't every lawyer want to win his clients case?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not so sure...
Chant "Billable Hours" until one shows...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Not so sure...
Chant "Billable Hours" until one shows..."
I thought you also had to do the chanting in front of the bathroom mirror with all the lights off, then they show up and kill you. I'm pretty sure that's what you need to do to summon a lawyer.
....well, either that or change your name to OJ....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Not so sure...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Not so sure...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Not so sure...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Not so sure...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Not so sure...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The term "wonderful lawyer" may be an oxymoron. But seriously, it's one thing to restrict a lawyer from advertising, but for a client to not be able to post information about a lawyer is just stupid. So is this just restricting positive posts only?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ethical Rules and Innovation
I am going to use it for another web site that is not a law firm web site, although I am not sure that discussing price as an attribute of a legal service is the same as a characterization of the quality of the legal service offered, as it just relates to pricing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
First Amendment doesn't protect Advertising
How is that reasonable? By that line of reasoning, the First Amendment should protect cigarette advertising as long as it's not inherently misleading.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: First Amendment doesn't protect Advertising
How is this unreasonable?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: First Amendment doesn't protect Advertising
Yes, and that line of reasoning would be correct for any entity not presently loathed by Rob Reiner.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: First Amendment doesn't protect Advertising
Yes, it does. Per the Supreme Court, commercial speech is entitled to 1st Amendment protection, just at a somewhat lesser level than non-commercial speech.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Preventing competition
The US is pretty interesting as there is one group of people who have basically completely gamed the political system - the lawyers. Because of this, it's likely that there will never be any attempts at breaking the bar association monopolies or creating laws that are more open and friendly to the public....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Right wingers working slow and steady
Wonder why the rhetoric on the right has gotten so loud and obnoxious? If i keep the dialogue so far right of center and you buy and accept that then I am much more likely to get things done right up the middle crap, you never would have put up with before.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Today lawyers, tomorrow insurance agents, next week teachers...
Should we just not talk to each other, lock ourselves in our houses, watch TV ads for big brands, pay our taxes and just be silent consumers?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Absolutely, the government exists for the sole purpose of serving the top one percent at public expense and that's just about all they do. and you shouldn't do anything about it because the top one percent, those with no regard for morality, are better than the rest of us due to their complete disregard for morality.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dont be so social
[ link to this | view in chronology ]