Did Manchester United Ban Players From Using Social Networks... Or Alert People To Fake Accounts?
from the and-does-either-make-sense dept
ethorad alerts us to the news that the UK football/soccer club Manchester United put out a statement insisting that none of its players use any social network accounts. The club apparently says that it's just stating a fact -- to stop people from thinking they're communicating with real players when they're actually talking to impostors -- rather than forcing the players off of social networks. However, the BBC notes that there were three ManU players who were believed to have real Twitter accounts, and all have suddenly disappeared -- which suggests the real issue is that ManU banned players from using social networks to connect with fans. If that's true, it seems incredibly short-sighted. Yes, players need to be careful when communicating publicly, but blocking them off entirely doesn't help make fans any more loyal.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: connecting with fans, manchester united, social networks
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Ban Social Netwroking?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Uh-huh. Well, don't struggle too hard, it's fairly obvious.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Loyalty to who?
The conflict plays out in all sports. Look at baseball in the US. For years, the teams had complete control on who could play where. Salaries remained low, even for the biggest stars. Then the teams were forced to allow free agency. Salaries for the stars exploded. The teams no longer captured all the profit.
From the point of view of an intelligent team, the right thing to do is to somehow have an official team presence for its stars. They want fans interested and following - but in a way that's tied primarily to the team, and secondarily to the player.
Now, what they *want* and what they can, in practice, *get* are two very different things. Since it isn't clear they can retain control over things like Twitter followers, the natural response is "live without 'em".
-- Jerry
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I find it curious that the Manchester United spokesperson in the BBC article says that "it wouldn't have been us that stopped them" from using Twitter and Facebook. So if it wasn't Man United, who was it? Are the players smart enough to know how to suspend their Twitter accounts and wipe all of the content from their Facebook walls? I doubt it.
As a follow-up to my original investigative article, I published a post yesterday which lists 30 Premier League footballers who do have currently active Twitter and Facebook accounts. That post can be found here: http://www.epltalk.com/list-of-30-premier-league-footballers-on-twitter-and-facebook/15242
Cheers ,
The Gaffer
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Man U
Go on and harass your sister on Facebook, no one else needs it.
dsk
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Man U
> need privacy and the public needs a life.
And of course you're the one who gets to decide these things for everyone else?
Here's a radical thought: Why not let people decide for themselves what they do and do not need?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Greeen & Gold protests?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You obviously are not a red devils supporter then.
Just ask any of the 12 year old kids walking around Old Trafford on a game day with their six packs of beer if they care what "party Dimitar" had for breakfast.
Red Devils supporters (in manchester anyway) are predominantly club over country types. Meaning they care more about their club winning trophies than England winning the world cup. I'd say their loyalty isn't going anywhere.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You obviously are not a red devils supporter then.
wait .. there are Man U supporters in manchester? Other than on match days?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And much as it pains me to admit it, there's a certain amount of truth in the stereotypical view of an inverse ratio of intelligence to enthusiasm for sport. I wouldn't credit your typical Premiership footballer with the wit to make use of Twitter; as my late grandfather once put it, "their brains are in their feet."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]