Writers Of 'Back Pockets On The Floor' Claim 'Pants On The Ground' Ripped Them Off...
from the copyright-gone-mad dept
Just start shaking your head now, because your level of disbelief should only increase as this post goes on. We recently wrote about how "General" Larry Platt, the latest YouTube viral sensation for his American Idol appearance with the song "Pants On The Ground" was lawyering up, as he felt that he wasn't getting money he deserved from everyone talking about and "covering" his song. Of course, he failed to register the copyright, so his remedies were pretty limited. We suggested that he focus on actually releasing the song himself and looking to capitalize on it in other ways... and it looks like he's doing just that. But even that is mired in claims of copyright infringement. And... then there's an argument making the rounds that Platt himself "ripped off" the song that made him famous from someone else, but we'll get to that at the end.First, Rose M. Welch points us to the news that after recording an official version in the studio, Platt was angry to find out that his ex-manager was distributing the recording without Platt's permission. The ex-manager says he doesn't need Larry's permission because "it's 'promotional' and not for profit." That's an interesting interpretation of copyright law.
But, much more amusing is that at the bottom of that article, it supposedly links to the "official version" of the video, but if you click on it to play, it pops up a message saying: "This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by FD Entertainment LLC." Wait, but I thought it was the "official" version. Yay for dueling copyright claims:
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: back pockets on the floor, copyright, larry platt, music, pants on the ground
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
And the video is ... where?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
oops
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Screen cap...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: oops
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: oops
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Curses
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: oops
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Not too simliar on the ground
if ...you can say ... musically.
Comments on the page...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Reminds me
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: oops
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: oops
(please tell me I ended that).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Curses
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: oops
Why 3?
Because according to some very nasty rullings that is all it takes to be considered infringement.
Well at least there is some hope for some sanity as BT won a case and is going to collect money for the attorney's fees.
http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/6343
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: oops
Why 3?
Because according to some very nasty rullings that is all it takes to be considered infringement.
Well at least there is some hope for some sanity as BT won a case and is going to collect money for the attorney's fees.
http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/case/vargas-v-bt
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Green Brothers
[ link to this | view in thread ]